Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches
In order to reveal the epidemic regularity of Huanglongbing (HLB) in different management approaches, different citrus production areas were selected between 2002 and 2012 to compare epidemic regularity of different types and control effects of different management approaches with plant incidence ra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版) 2016, Vol.7 (2), p.7-10 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian |
description | In order to reveal the epidemic regularity of Huanglongbing (HLB) in different management approaches, different citrus production areas were selected between 2002 and 2012 to compare epidemic regularity of different types and control effects of different management approaches with plant incidence rate. All survey data in 11 years were used to build a mathematical model, and epidemic evolution and control effects were quantitatively analyzed. The results indicated that diffusion and prevalence of HLB generally increased linearly. In naturally growing citrus orchards without artificial control, the annual diseased plant rate was 11.11%, and the epidemic diffusion model was y1 = 12. 24x - 1.382 8 ( n =9, r =0. 976 9 * * ). Under general prevention and control conditions, the annual diseased plant rate was 4.69%, the epidemic diffusion model was Y2 = 5. 449 8x - 1.603 5 ( n = 11, r =0. 974 9 * * ), and the control effect was 43.93% (22.93% - 55.04% ). In citrus orchards with integrated prevention and control, the epidemic diffusion model was Y3 = 0. 366 3x - 0. 342 2 ( n = 11, r = 0. 989 8 * * ), the control effect was 96.15% (94.95% -97.40% ), and the annual diseased plant rate was 0.31%. Thus, HLB is preventable and controllable as long as integrated prevention and control work is implemented well. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>chongqing</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_chongqing_primary_669712465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>669712465</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>669712465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-chongqing_primary_6697124653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjD8OgjAcRjtoIlHu8Is7ifyrYVTEMOhi3EmFUmpKW0sZuIHeiTt5BTHxAH7L-4aXN0NO4MeBFyZhsEBu190303CCowg7qMo0r2jLS7hQ1gtiuB2AyApSJa1RArK6pqUFVUPeE8mEkuzGJYP3-MxP-_f4Ai7hwCfLUGnhTCRhtP3endZGkbKh3QrNayI66v64ROtjdk1zr2ym3GPKFdrwlpihwDjZ-kGE4_Av6QNgUEdd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</creatorcontrib><description>In order to reveal the epidemic regularity of Huanglongbing (HLB) in different management approaches, different citrus production areas were selected between 2002 and 2012 to compare epidemic regularity of different types and control effects of different management approaches with plant incidence rate. All survey data in 11 years were used to build a mathematical model, and epidemic evolution and control effects were quantitatively analyzed. The results indicated that diffusion and prevalence of HLB generally increased linearly. In naturally growing citrus orchards without artificial control, the annual diseased plant rate was 11.11%, and the epidemic diffusion model was y1 = 12. 24x - 1.382 8 ( n =9, r =0. 976 9 * * ). Under general prevention and control conditions, the annual diseased plant rate was 4.69%, the epidemic diffusion model was Y2 = 5. 449 8x - 1.603 5 ( n = 11, r =0. 974 9 * * ), and the control effect was 43.93% (22.93% - 55.04% ). In citrus orchards with integrated prevention and control, the epidemic diffusion model was Y3 = 0. 366 3x - 0. 342 2 ( n = 11, r = 0. 989 8 * * ), the control effect was 96.15% (94.95% -97.40% ), and the annual diseased plant rate was 0.31%. Thus, HLB is preventable and controllable as long as integrated prevention and control work is implemented well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-3932</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>HLB值 ; 发病株率 ; 扩散模型 ; 控制效果 ; 柑桔黄龙病 ; 流行规律 ; 管理 ; 综合防治</subject><ispartof>Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版), 2016, Vol.7 (2), p.7-10</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71580X/71580X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches</title><title>Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版)</title><addtitle>Plant Diseases and Pests</addtitle><description>In order to reveal the epidemic regularity of Huanglongbing (HLB) in different management approaches, different citrus production areas were selected between 2002 and 2012 to compare epidemic regularity of different types and control effects of different management approaches with plant incidence rate. All survey data in 11 years were used to build a mathematical model, and epidemic evolution and control effects were quantitatively analyzed. The results indicated that diffusion and prevalence of HLB generally increased linearly. In naturally growing citrus orchards without artificial control, the annual diseased plant rate was 11.11%, and the epidemic diffusion model was y1 = 12. 24x - 1.382 8 ( n =9, r =0. 976 9 * * ). Under general prevention and control conditions, the annual diseased plant rate was 4.69%, the epidemic diffusion model was Y2 = 5. 449 8x - 1.603 5 ( n = 11, r =0. 974 9 * * ), and the control effect was 43.93% (22.93% - 55.04% ). In citrus orchards with integrated prevention and control, the epidemic diffusion model was Y3 = 0. 366 3x - 0. 342 2 ( n = 11, r = 0. 989 8 * * ), the control effect was 96.15% (94.95% -97.40% ), and the annual diseased plant rate was 0.31%. Thus, HLB is preventable and controllable as long as integrated prevention and control work is implemented well.</description><subject>HLB值</subject><subject>发病株率</subject><subject>扩散模型</subject><subject>控制效果</subject><subject>柑桔黄龙病</subject><subject>流行规律</subject><subject>管理</subject><subject>综合防治</subject><issn>2152-3932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjD8OgjAcRjtoIlHu8Is7ifyrYVTEMOhi3EmFUmpKW0sZuIHeiTt5BTHxAH7L-4aXN0NO4MeBFyZhsEBu190303CCowg7qMo0r2jLS7hQ1gtiuB2AyApSJa1RArK6pqUFVUPeE8mEkuzGJYP3-MxP-_f4Ai7hwCfLUGnhTCRhtP3endZGkbKh3QrNayI66v64ROtjdk1zr2ym3GPKFdrwlpihwDjZ-kGE4_Av6QNgUEdd</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</creator><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches</title><author>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_6697124653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>HLB值</topic><topic>发病株率</topic><topic>扩散模型</topic><topic>控制效果</topic><topic>柑桔黄龙病</topic><topic>流行规律</topic><topic>管理</topic><topic>综合防治</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu Jihua Wang Enguo Lu Lu Zhang Minrong Tao Jian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Diseases and Pests</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>7-10</pages><issn>2152-3932</issn><abstract>In order to reveal the epidemic regularity of Huanglongbing (HLB) in different management approaches, different citrus production areas were selected between 2002 and 2012 to compare epidemic regularity of different types and control effects of different management approaches with plant incidence rate. All survey data in 11 years were used to build a mathematical model, and epidemic evolution and control effects were quantitatively analyzed. The results indicated that diffusion and prevalence of HLB generally increased linearly. In naturally growing citrus orchards without artificial control, the annual diseased plant rate was 11.11%, and the epidemic diffusion model was y1 = 12. 24x - 1.382 8 ( n =9, r =0. 976 9 * * ). Under general prevention and control conditions, the annual diseased plant rate was 4.69%, the epidemic diffusion model was Y2 = 5. 449 8x - 1.603 5 ( n = 11, r =0. 974 9 * * ), and the control effect was 43.93% (22.93% - 55.04% ). In citrus orchards with integrated prevention and control, the epidemic diffusion model was Y3 = 0. 366 3x - 0. 342 2 ( n = 11, r = 0. 989 8 * * ), the control effect was 96.15% (94.95% -97.40% ), and the annual diseased plant rate was 0.31%. Thus, HLB is preventable and controllable as long as integrated prevention and control work is implemented well.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2152-3932 |
ispartof | Plant Diseases and Pests(植物病虫害研究:英文版), 2016, Vol.7 (2), p.7-10 |
issn | 2152-3932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_chongqing_primary_669712465 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | HLB值 发病株率 扩散模型 控制效果 柑桔黄龙病 流行规律 管理 综合防治 |
title | Epidemic Regularity and Control Effect of Huanglongbing (HLB) in Different Management Approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-chongqing&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemic%20Regularity%20and%20Control%20Effect%20of%20Huanglongbing%20%EF%BC%88HLB%EF%BC%89%20in%20Different%20Management%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Plant%20Diseases%20and%20Pests(%E6%A4%8D%E7%89%A9%E7%97%85%E8%99%AB%E5%AE%B3%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88)&rft.au=Yu%20Jihua%20Wang%20Enguo%20Lu%20Lu%20Zhang%20Minrong%20Tao%20Jian&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=7-10&rft.issn=2152-3932&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cchongqing%3E669712465%3C/chongqing%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=669712465&rfr_iscdi=true |