Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values
For several ontology constructing reasons of migration, extending or merging, the size of ontolo- gies grows and applications become more complex, it is inevitable for us to receive an inconsistent ontology. Mea- suring ontology inconsistency is the basis inconsistency- dealing, which can help us de...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 电子学报：英文版 2014-04, Vol.23 (2), p.227-231 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 231 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 227 |
| container_title | 电子学报：英文版 |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin |
| description | For several ontology constructing reasons of migration, extending or merging, the size of ontolo- gies grows and applications become more complex, it is inevitable for us to receive an inconsistent ontology. Mea- suring ontology inconsistency is the basis inconsistency- dealing, which can help us decide how to act on an incon- sistency. Measuring ontology inconsistency with weighted formulae in numerous applications is a significant but diffi- cult task for most efforts which only deal with the fiat on- tology. This paper improves inconsistency measure based on evidence theory and proposes a novel Dempster-Shafer ontology inconsistency measure method. The logical prop- erties of these measures are studied. The properties show how to look inside the formulae and how to indicate the contribution of each formula to the overall inconsistency in the ontology set. This approach would provide us with a stronger base of inconsistency handling. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>chongqing</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_chongqing_primary_49522437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>49522437</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>49522437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-520a726df9add40a1d1353913b01fe216fa29936c83a45173525d3bc40f6bb373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMtqQjEUALOooKj_YKHbQM45Sa5ZFvtQEFzYupWTl17QaG_swr9X0NXAMMyLGIBClNoa6otxra1XyjbKAOBAvH2k47leUifXe86pmyxKOJXa3lUJ18mGD_-pjkQv86Gm8ZND8fv1-TOby-XqezF7X8oAU7hIg4obtDE7jlErhghkyAF5BTkh2MzoHNkwJdYGGjJoIvmgVbbeU0ND8fr4hv2p7P7astueu_bI3XWrnUHU9-YGzw45iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</creator><creatorcontrib>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</creatorcontrib><description>For several ontology constructing reasons of migration, extending or merging, the size of ontolo- gies grows and applications become more complex, it is inevitable for us to receive an inconsistent ontology. Mea- suring ontology inconsistency is the basis inconsistency- dealing, which can help us decide how to act on an incon- sistency. Measuring ontology inconsistency with weighted formulae in numerous applications is a significant but diffi- cult task for most efforts which only deal with the fiat on- tology. This paper improves inconsistency measure based on evidence theory and proposes a novel Dempster-Shafer ontology inconsistency measure method. The logical prop- erties of these measures are studied. The properties show how to look inside the formulae and how to indicate the contribution of each formula to the overall inconsistency in the ontology set. This approach would provide us with a stronger base of inconsistency handling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1022-4653</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>不一致性 ; 价值观 ; 公式 ; 本体论 ; 组织学 ; 菲亚特 ; 证据理论</subject><ispartof>电子学报：英文版, 2014-04, Vol.23 (2), p.227-231</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86774X/86774X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</creatorcontrib><title>Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values</title><title>电子学报：英文版</title><addtitle>Chinese of Journal Electronics</addtitle><description>For several ontology constructing reasons of migration, extending or merging, the size of ontolo- gies grows and applications become more complex, it is inevitable for us to receive an inconsistent ontology. Mea- suring ontology inconsistency is the basis inconsistency- dealing, which can help us decide how to act on an incon- sistency. Measuring ontology inconsistency with weighted formulae in numerous applications is a significant but diffi- cult task for most efforts which only deal with the fiat on- tology. This paper improves inconsistency measure based on evidence theory and proposes a novel Dempster-Shafer ontology inconsistency measure method. The logical prop- erties of these measures are studied. The properties show how to look inside the formulae and how to indicate the contribution of each formula to the overall inconsistency in the ontology set. This approach would provide us with a stronger base of inconsistency handling.</description><subject>不一致性</subject><subject>价值观</subject><subject>公式</subject><subject>本体论</subject><subject>组织学</subject><subject>菲亚特</subject><subject>证据理论</subject><issn>1022-4653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjMtqQjEUALOooKj_YKHbQM45Sa5ZFvtQEFzYupWTl17QaG_swr9X0NXAMMyLGIBClNoa6otxra1XyjbKAOBAvH2k47leUifXe86pmyxKOJXa3lUJ18mGD_-pjkQv86Gm8ZND8fv1-TOby-XqezF7X8oAU7hIg4obtDE7jlErhghkyAF5BTkh2MzoHNkwJdYGGjJoIvmgVbbeU0ND8fr4hv2p7P7astueu_bI3XWrnUHU9-YGzw45iw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</creator><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W92</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values</title><author>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-520a726df9add40a1d1353913b01fe216fa29936c83a45173525d3bc40f6bb373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>不一致性</topic><topic>价值观</topic><topic>公式</topic><topic>本体论</topic><topic>组织学</topic><topic>菲亚特</topic><topic>证据理论</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-工程技术</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>电子学报：英文版</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LI Dongmei LIN Youfang HUANG Houkuan HAO Shudong WANG Jianxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values</atitle><jtitle>电子学报：英文版</jtitle><addtitle>Chinese of Journal Electronics</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>227-231</pages><issn>1022-4653</issn><abstract>For several ontology constructing reasons of migration, extending or merging, the size of ontolo- gies grows and applications become more complex, it is inevitable for us to receive an inconsistent ontology. Mea- suring ontology inconsistency is the basis inconsistency- dealing, which can help us decide how to act on an incon- sistency. Measuring ontology inconsistency with weighted formulae in numerous applications is a significant but diffi- cult task for most efforts which only deal with the fiat on- tology. This paper improves inconsistency measure based on evidence theory and proposes a novel Dempster-Shafer ontology inconsistency measure method. The logical prop- erties of these measures are studied. The properties show how to look inside the formulae and how to indicate the contribution of each formula to the overall inconsistency in the ontology set. This approach would provide us with a stronger base of inconsistency handling.</abstract><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1022-4653 |
| ispartof | 电子学报：英文版, 2014-04, Vol.23 (2), p.227-231 |
| issn | 1022-4653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_chongqing_primary_49522437 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | 不一致性 价值观 公式 本体论 组织学 菲亚特 证据理论 |
| title | Dempster-Shafer Inconsistency Values |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A28%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-chongqing&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dempster-Shafer%20Inconsistency%20Values&rft.jtitle=%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=LI%20Dongmei%20LIN%20Youfang%20HUANG%20Houkuan%20HAO%20Shudong%20WANG%20Jianxin&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=227-231&rft.issn=1022-4653&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cchongqing%3E49522437%3C/chongqing%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=49522437&rfr_iscdi=true |