Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista

The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first profes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Filozofska istraživanja 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291
1. Verfasser: Plećaš, Tamara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:hrv ; eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 291
container_issue 2/162
container_start_page 279
container_title Filozofska istraživanja
container_volume 41
creator Plećaš, Tamara
description The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.
doi_str_mv 10.21464/fi41204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_995090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>995090</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>995090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1254-761a04c191ace4ea8bc87adf1655a64dc6ff29a7a4bffc3f242232350aae26b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj8FLwzAYxYMoOKfgH-ChRw92fkm-ps1RxqbCwIN6Dl_TZKSba0m6gf-9RXv09OC9H4_3GLvlsBAcFT76gFwAnrEZr7DKhQR9zmYgC55jCeqSXaXUAiCoSs4Yvne7SEMWslUfdoMbslNaZH080Wg18bilbOsOLpINLWWp8yENdM0uPO2Tu5l0zj7Xq4_lS755e35dPm1yy0WBeak4AVquOVmHjqraViU1nquiIIWNVd4LTSVh7b2VXqAQUsgCiJxQtZZzdv_Xa2OXUnTe9DF8Ufw2HMzvWzO9HdG7CXWu25u2O8bDOM1oXYCGMX74N6Y4BLt3punshJq-8fIHtJFfww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Plećaš, Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0351-4706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-2309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21464/fi41204</identifier><language>hrv ; eng</language><publisher>Croatian Philosophical Society</publisher><subject>Ancient Philosphy ; Ethics / Practical Philosophy ; Rhetoric</subject><ispartof>Filozofska istraživanja, 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_64147.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><title>Filozofska istraživanja</title><addtitle>Philosophical Research</addtitle><description>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</description><subject>Ancient Philosphy</subject><subject>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><issn>0351-4706</issn><issn>1848-2309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNptj8FLwzAYxYMoOKfgH-ChRw92fkm-ps1RxqbCwIN6Dl_TZKSba0m6gf-9RXv09OC9H4_3GLvlsBAcFT76gFwAnrEZr7DKhQR9zmYgC55jCeqSXaXUAiCoSs4Yvne7SEMWslUfdoMbslNaZH080Wg18bilbOsOLpINLWWp8yENdM0uPO2Tu5l0zj7Xq4_lS755e35dPm1yy0WBeak4AVquOVmHjqraViU1nquiIIWNVd4LTSVh7b2VXqAQUsgCiJxQtZZzdv_Xa2OXUnTe9DF8Ufw2HMzvWzO9HdG7CXWu25u2O8bDOM1oXYCGMX74N6Y4BLt3punshJq-8fIHtJFfww</recordid><startdate>20210709</startdate><enddate>20210709</enddate><creator>Plećaš, Tamara</creator><general>Croatian Philosophical Society</general><general>Hrvatsko Filozofsko Društvo</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210709</creationdate><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><author>Plećaš, Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1254-761a04c191ace4ea8bc87adf1655a64dc6ff29a7a4bffc3f242232350aae26b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>hrv ; eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ancient Philosphy</topic><topic>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Filozofska istraživanja</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plećaš, Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</atitle><jtitle>Filozofska istraživanja</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophical Research</addtitle><date>2021-07-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2/162</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>279-291</pages><issn>0351-4706</issn><eissn>1848-2309</eissn><abstract>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</abstract><pub>Croatian Philosophical Society</pub><doi>10.21464/fi41204</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0351-4706
ispartof Filozofska istraživanja, 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291
issn 0351-4706
1848-2309
language hrv ; eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_995090
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Ancient Philosphy
Ethics / Practical Philosophy
Rhetoric
title Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A03%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sokrat%20i%20Epiktet%20vs.%20prva%20i%20druga%20generacija%20sofista&rft.jtitle=Filozofska%20istra%C5%BEivanja&rft.au=Ple%C4%87a%C5%A1,%20Tamara&rft.date=2021-07-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2/162&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=279-291&rft.issn=0351-4706&rft.eissn=1848-2309&rft_id=info:doi/10.21464/fi41204&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E995090%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=995090&rfr_iscdi=true