Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista
The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first profes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Filozofska istraživanja 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | hrv ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2/162 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Filozofska istraživanja |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Plećaš, Tamara |
description | The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21464/fi41204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_995090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>995090</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>995090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1254-761a04c191ace4ea8bc87adf1655a64dc6ff29a7a4bffc3f242232350aae26b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj8FLwzAYxYMoOKfgH-ChRw92fkm-ps1RxqbCwIN6Dl_TZKSba0m6gf-9RXv09OC9H4_3GLvlsBAcFT76gFwAnrEZr7DKhQR9zmYgC55jCeqSXaXUAiCoSs4Yvne7SEMWslUfdoMbslNaZH080Wg18bilbOsOLpINLWWp8yENdM0uPO2Tu5l0zj7Xq4_lS755e35dPm1yy0WBeak4AVquOVmHjqraViU1nquiIIWNVd4LTSVh7b2VXqAQUsgCiJxQtZZzdv_Xa2OXUnTe9DF8Ufw2HMzvWzO9HdG7CXWu25u2O8bDOM1oXYCGMX74N6Y4BLt3punshJq-8fIHtJFfww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Plećaš, Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0351-4706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-2309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21464/fi41204</identifier><language>hrv ; eng</language><publisher>Croatian Philosophical Society</publisher><subject>Ancient Philosphy ; Ethics / Practical Philosophy ; Rhetoric</subject><ispartof>Filozofska istraživanja, 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_64147.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><title>Filozofska istraživanja</title><addtitle>Philosophical Research</addtitle><description>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</description><subject>Ancient Philosphy</subject><subject>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><issn>0351-4706</issn><issn>1848-2309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNptj8FLwzAYxYMoOKfgH-ChRw92fkm-ps1RxqbCwIN6Dl_TZKSba0m6gf-9RXv09OC9H4_3GLvlsBAcFT76gFwAnrEZr7DKhQR9zmYgC55jCeqSXaXUAiCoSs4Yvne7SEMWslUfdoMbslNaZH080Wg18bilbOsOLpINLWWp8yENdM0uPO2Tu5l0zj7Xq4_lS755e35dPm1yy0WBeak4AVquOVmHjqraViU1nquiIIWNVd4LTSVh7b2VXqAQUsgCiJxQtZZzdv_Xa2OXUnTe9DF8Ufw2HMzvWzO9HdG7CXWu25u2O8bDOM1oXYCGMX74N6Y4BLt3punshJq-8fIHtJFfww</recordid><startdate>20210709</startdate><enddate>20210709</enddate><creator>Plećaš, Tamara</creator><general>Croatian Philosophical Society</general><general>Hrvatsko Filozofsko Društvo</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210709</creationdate><title>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</title><author>Plećaš, Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1254-761a04c191ace4ea8bc87adf1655a64dc6ff29a7a4bffc3f242232350aae26b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>hrv ; eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ancient Philosphy</topic><topic>Ethics / Practical Philosophy</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plećaš, Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Filozofska istraživanja</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plećaš, Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista</atitle><jtitle>Filozofska istraživanja</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophical Research</addtitle><date>2021-07-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2/162</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>279-291</pages><issn>0351-4706</issn><eissn>1848-2309</eissn><abstract>The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.</abstract><pub>Croatian Philosophical Society</pub><doi>10.21464/fi41204</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0351-4706 |
ispartof | Filozofska istraživanja, 2021-07, Vol.41 (2/162), p.279-291 |
issn | 0351-4706 1848-2309 |
language | hrv ; eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_995090 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Ancient Philosphy Ethics / Practical Philosophy Rhetoric |
title | Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A03%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sokrat%20i%20Epiktet%20vs.%20prva%20i%20druga%20generacija%20sofista&rft.jtitle=Filozofska%20istra%C5%BEivanja&rft.au=Ple%C4%87a%C5%A1,%20Tamara&rft.date=2021-07-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2/162&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=279-291&rft.issn=0351-4706&rft.eissn=1848-2309&rft_id=info:doi/10.21464/fi41204&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E995090%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=995090&rfr_iscdi=true |