SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE

The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the imple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Jurisprudencija 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199
1. Verfasser: Kurelaitytė, Eglė
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; lit
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 199
container_issue 1
container_start_page 179
container_title Jurisprudencija
container_volume 28
creator Kurelaitytė, Eglė
description The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.
doi_str_mv 10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_973064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>973064</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>973064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c864-313bd0ea7bb63c8fd1bacc01e52898936835f2684e191bacfa035fb0f12222023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjb1OwzAUhS0EEqUwszBEYsXgn9i1x6qE4FDqynZYo8RxJKqKlKZ9A56hT9QHI1UrsXCXI53v07kA3GL0iCnm7CnLDSQYEgExRPIMDAgiEhLExDkYYCoJ5FiyS3DVdQuEGCMjOQBzm7tcvzk1UzpSJjJJqqwzuXY6mo-NmyWmB9Oxsh86yvLn_S5T7zpyibL7nY2S3Oi5tpHd_2T5LNVZcg0umnLZhZtTDoF7SdzkFU51qibjKfSCx5BiWtUolKOq4tSLpsZV6T3CgREhhaRcUNYQLuKA5QE1JeqLCjWY9IcIHYL74-xq3X5vQ7cpFu12_dV_LAjjTCDM47i37o6WD6Fd_ilyRBE_4Id_cbnefPplKOrWn9RiVTf0F3kAZOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565801644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><description>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1392-6195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2029-2058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09</identifier><language>eng ; lit</language><publisher>Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University</publisher><subject>Equal rights ; EU-Legislation</subject><ispartof>Jurisprudencija, 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_62440.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><title>Jurisprudencija</title><addtitle>Jurisprudence</addtitle><description>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</description><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>EU-Legislation</subject><issn>1392-6195</issn><issn>2029-2058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptjb1OwzAUhS0EEqUwszBEYsXgn9i1x6qE4FDqynZYo8RxJKqKlKZ9A56hT9QHI1UrsXCXI53v07kA3GL0iCnm7CnLDSQYEgExRPIMDAgiEhLExDkYYCoJ5FiyS3DVdQuEGCMjOQBzm7tcvzk1UzpSJjJJqqwzuXY6mo-NmyWmB9Oxsh86yvLn_S5T7zpyibL7nY2S3Oi5tpHd_2T5LNVZcg0umnLZhZtTDoF7SdzkFU51qibjKfSCx5BiWtUolKOq4tSLpsZV6T3CgREhhaRcUNYQLuKA5QE1JeqLCjWY9IcIHYL74-xq3X5vQ7cpFu12_dV_LAjjTCDM47i37o6WD6Fd_ilyRBE_4Id_cbnefPplKOrWn9RiVTf0F3kAZOw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creator><general>Mykolas Romeris University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><author>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c864-313bd0ea7bb63c8fd1bacc01e52898936835f2684e191bacfa035fb0f12222023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; lit</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>EU-Legislation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Jurisprudencija</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</atitle><jtitle>Jurisprudencija</jtitle><addtitle>Jurisprudence</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>179-199</pages><issn>1392-6195</issn><eissn>2029-2058</eissn><abstract>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</abstract><cop>Vilnius</cop><pub>Mykolas Romeris University</pub><doi>10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1392-6195
ispartof Jurisprudencija, 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199
issn 1392-6195
2029-2058
language eng ; lit
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_973064
source Political Science Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Equal rights
EU-Legislation
title SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SUTUOKTINIO%20IR%20REGISTRUOTO%20PARTNERIO%20LAISVO%20JUD%C4%96JIMO%20TEIS%C4%96S%20EUROPOS%20S%C4%84JUNGOJE&rft.jtitle=Jurisprudencija&rft.au=Kurelaityt%C4%97,%20Egl%C4%97&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=179-199&rft.issn=1392-6195&rft.eissn=2029-2058&rft_id=info:doi/10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E973064%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565801644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=973064&rfr_iscdi=true