SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE
The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the imple...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Jurisprudencija 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; lit |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 199 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Jurisprudencija |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Kurelaitytė, Eglė |
description | The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_973064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>973064</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>973064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c864-313bd0ea7bb63c8fd1bacc01e52898936835f2684e191bacfa035fb0f12222023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjb1OwzAUhS0EEqUwszBEYsXgn9i1x6qE4FDqynZYo8RxJKqKlKZ9A56hT9QHI1UrsXCXI53v07kA3GL0iCnm7CnLDSQYEgExRPIMDAgiEhLExDkYYCoJ5FiyS3DVdQuEGCMjOQBzm7tcvzk1UzpSJjJJqqwzuXY6mo-NmyWmB9Oxsh86yvLn_S5T7zpyibL7nY2S3Oi5tpHd_2T5LNVZcg0umnLZhZtTDoF7SdzkFU51qibjKfSCx5BiWtUolKOq4tSLpsZV6T3CgREhhaRcUNYQLuKA5QE1JeqLCjWY9IcIHYL74-xq3X5vQ7cpFu12_dV_LAjjTCDM47i37o6WD6Fd_ilyRBE_4Id_cbnefPplKOrWn9RiVTf0F3kAZOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565801644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><description>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1392-6195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2029-2058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09</identifier><language>eng ; lit</language><publisher>Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University</publisher><subject>Equal rights ; EU-Legislation</subject><ispartof>Jurisprudencija, 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_62440.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><title>Jurisprudencija</title><addtitle>Jurisprudence</addtitle><description>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</description><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>EU-Legislation</subject><issn>1392-6195</issn><issn>2029-2058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptjb1OwzAUhS0EEqUwszBEYsXgn9i1x6qE4FDqynZYo8RxJKqKlKZ9A56hT9QHI1UrsXCXI53v07kA3GL0iCnm7CnLDSQYEgExRPIMDAgiEhLExDkYYCoJ5FiyS3DVdQuEGCMjOQBzm7tcvzk1UzpSJjJJqqwzuXY6mo-NmyWmB9Oxsh86yvLn_S5T7zpyibL7nY2S3Oi5tpHd_2T5LNVZcg0umnLZhZtTDoF7SdzkFU51qibjKfSCx5BiWtUolKOq4tSLpsZV6T3CgREhhaRcUNYQLuKA5QE1JeqLCjWY9IcIHYL74-xq3X5vQ7cpFu12_dV_LAjjTCDM47i37o6WD6Fd_ilyRBE_4Id_cbnefPplKOrWn9RiVTf0F3kAZOw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creator><general>Mykolas Romeris University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</title><author>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c864-313bd0ea7bb63c8fd1bacc01e52898936835f2684e191bacfa035fb0f12222023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; lit</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>EU-Legislation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Jurisprudencija</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurelaitytė, Eglė</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE</atitle><jtitle>Jurisprudencija</jtitle><addtitle>Jurisprudence</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>179-199</pages><issn>1392-6195</issn><eissn>2029-2058</eissn><abstract>The problems of rights regarding free movement for spouses and registered partners are analysed in the context of the possible limits which can be imposed by the provisions of national law. After a brief analysis of the general grounds for imposing limits on these rights, it is stated that the implementation of the internal market and the growing importance of the provisions of European Union citizenship in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice mean less discretion for national law provisions to interrupt the enforcement of these rights. Consequently, in EU law the grounds for limiting rights to free movement for spouses are constructed narrowly, resulting in all spouses having equal rights to free movement even in national legal systems which have no provisions on same-sex marriages (or even Constitutional limits, as in the case of Lithuania).The implementation of rights to free movement for registered partners is more problematic, despite the somewhat narrow discretion of the state in this field. Even though there are two types of legal regime for registered partners, in all cases national laws have narrow discretion to impose limits on them. It is argued that partners have a right to family reunification while implementing Directive 2004/38 in Lithuania with accordance to recent developments in the constitutional doctrine.</abstract><cop>Vilnius</cop><pub>Mykolas Romeris University</pub><doi>10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1392-6195 |
ispartof | Jurisprudencija, 2021, Vol.28 (1), p.179-199 |
issn | 1392-6195 2029-2058 |
language | eng ; lit |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_973064 |
source | Political Science Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Equal rights EU-Legislation |
title | SUTUOKTINIO IR REGISTRUOTO PARTNERIO LAISVO JUDĖJIMO TEISĖS EUROPOS SĄJUNGOJE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SUTUOKTINIO%20IR%20REGISTRUOTO%20PARTNERIO%20LAISVO%20JUD%C4%96JIMO%20TEIS%C4%96S%20EUROPOS%20S%C4%84JUNGOJE&rft.jtitle=Jurisprudencija&rft.au=Kurelaityt%C4%97,%20Egl%C4%97&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=179-199&rft.issn=1392-6195&rft.eissn=2029-2058&rft_id=info:doi/10.13165/JUR-21-28-1-09&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E973064%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565801644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=973064&rfr_iscdi=true |