INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
This article deals with the challenges that global governance has been enduring in the 21st century and focuses on the role of the novel coronavirus pandemic over its institutions. The discussion begins with an overview of global governance, emphasizing the theoretic dichotomy in international relat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi 2020, Vol.8 (52), p.971-982 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 982 |
---|---|
container_issue | 52 |
container_start_page | 971 |
container_title | Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece |
description | This article deals with the challenges that global governance has been enduring in the 21st century and focuses on the role of the novel coronavirus pandemic over its institutions. The discussion begins with an overview of global governance, emphasizing the theoretic dichotomy in international relations literature over whether the liberal international order is dissipating or not. This will set the stage for the analysis of both national and international responses to the Covid 19 public health crisis. The article highlights how the interaction between national policies translate to the international behavior of states by linking the domestic-foreign policy divide from a qualitative perspective. As a case study, the article analyses the World Health Organization as a prime example of a global governance institution in the international system. For comparison purposes regarding the national aspect, this analysis takes the examples of the Unites States of America, China, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Russia, Turkey and the United Kingdom as instances where national responses to the crisis translate into their international stance. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_972624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>972624</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>972624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_9726243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMuKwkAQRXuhoKh_4KI-QKHz8LnLtKU2xO7Q3UZcBYkRlDAZzLj30y0HmZXgpoq659RtsLbvhdMhD0dei_Xq-sI590b-LJjyNrtL5dCoyEmtohgitYD_w6LYGun2AzAYU5giJHqHhqaVT8f--atYf5G90umzSAmck28TwmjBaXBrBEUwBqENFafSbC0k9IobKbqseTqUddF77Q7rL9GJ9TAviqrMLtXt-k15Npv4Yz8MPuLBW3y4_p7zssiOVf5Ss5_jKXgALrRP4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</creator><creatorcontrib>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</creatorcontrib><description>This article deals with the challenges that global governance has been enduring in the 21st century and focuses on the role of the novel coronavirus pandemic over its institutions. The discussion begins with an overview of global governance, emphasizing the theoretic dichotomy in international relations literature over whether the liberal international order is dissipating or not. This will set the stage for the analysis of both national and international responses to the Covid 19 public health crisis. The article highlights how the interaction between national policies translate to the international behavior of states by linking the domestic-foreign policy divide from a qualitative perspective. As a case study, the article analyses the World Health Organization as a prime example of a global governance institution in the international system. For comparison purposes regarding the national aspect, this analysis takes the examples of the Unites States of America, China, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Russia, Turkey and the United Kingdom as instances where national responses to the crisis translate into their international stance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2148-0451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SADA Institute of Art and Language Studies</publisher><subject>Comparative politics ; Globalization ; Governance ; Health and medicine and law ; Political behavior ; Security and defense</subject><ispartof>Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi, 2020, Vol.8 (52), p.971-982</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2020_62394.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</creatorcontrib><title>INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC</title><title>Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi</title><addtitle>Ulakbilge International Journal of Social Sciences</addtitle><description>This article deals with the challenges that global governance has been enduring in the 21st century and focuses on the role of the novel coronavirus pandemic over its institutions. The discussion begins with an overview of global governance, emphasizing the theoretic dichotomy in international relations literature over whether the liberal international order is dissipating or not. This will set the stage for the analysis of both national and international responses to the Covid 19 public health crisis. The article highlights how the interaction between national policies translate to the international behavior of states by linking the domestic-foreign policy divide from a qualitative perspective. As a case study, the article analyses the World Health Organization as a prime example of a global governance institution in the international system. For comparison purposes regarding the national aspect, this analysis takes the examples of the Unites States of America, China, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Russia, Turkey and the United Kingdom as instances where national responses to the crisis translate into their international stance.</description><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Health and medicine and law</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Security and defense</subject><issn>2148-0451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjMuKwkAQRXuhoKh_4KI-QKHz8LnLtKU2xO7Q3UZcBYkRlDAZzLj30y0HmZXgpoq659RtsLbvhdMhD0dei_Xq-sI590b-LJjyNrtL5dCoyEmtohgitYD_w6LYGun2AzAYU5giJHqHhqaVT8f--atYf5G90umzSAmck28TwmjBaXBrBEUwBqENFafSbC0k9IobKbqseTqUddF77Q7rL9GJ9TAviqrMLtXt-k15Npv4Yz8MPuLBW3y4_p7zssiOVf5Ss5_jKXgALrRP4w</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</creator><general>SADA Institute of Art and Language Studies</general><general>Sanat ve Dil Araştırmaları Enstitüsü</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC</title><author>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_9726243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Health and medicine and law</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Security and defense</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ÇİÇEK, Aylin Ece</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC</atitle><jtitle>Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi</jtitle><addtitle>Ulakbilge International Journal of Social Sciences</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>52</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>982</epage><pages>971-982</pages><issn>2148-0451</issn><abstract>This article deals with the challenges that global governance has been enduring in the 21st century and focuses on the role of the novel coronavirus pandemic over its institutions. The discussion begins with an overview of global governance, emphasizing the theoretic dichotomy in international relations literature over whether the liberal international order is dissipating or not. This will set the stage for the analysis of both national and international responses to the Covid 19 public health crisis. The article highlights how the interaction between national policies translate to the international behavior of states by linking the domestic-foreign policy divide from a qualitative perspective. As a case study, the article analyses the World Health Organization as a prime example of a global governance institution in the international system. For comparison purposes regarding the national aspect, this analysis takes the examples of the Unites States of America, China, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Russia, Turkey and the United Kingdom as instances where national responses to the crisis translate into their international stance.</abstract><pub>SADA Institute of Art and Language Studies</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2148-0451 |
ispartof | Ulakbilge sosyal bilimler Dergisi, 2020, Vol.8 (52), p.971-982 |
issn | 2148-0451 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_972624 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Comparative politics Globalization Governance Health and medicine and law Political behavior Security and defense |
title | INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY, RELATIVE POWER POSITIONS AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: RESPONSES TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INTERNATIONAL%20AND%20NATIONAL%20SECURITY,%20RELATIVE%20POWER%20POSITIONS%20AND%20GLOBAL%20GOVERNANCE:%20RESPONSES%20TO%20THE%20NOVEL%20CORONAVIRUS%20PANDEMIC&rft.jtitle=Ulakbilge%20sosyal%20bilimler%20Dergisi&rft.au=%C3%87%C4%B0%C3%87EK,%20Aylin%20Ece&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=52&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=982&rft.pages=971-982&rft.issn=2148-0451&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E972624%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=972624&rfr_iscdi=true |