ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ
This paper is an effort for some different approach of Dostoevsky`s poetic concerning Bahtin`s interpretation. Namely, the paper is a critical overview of Bahtin`s interpretation on Dostoevsky`s “polyphonic novel” offering completely different interpretation of Dostoevsky`s work. Bahtin`s interpreta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia) North Macedonia), 2016, Vol.1 (2), p.115-126 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; mac |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia) |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Stojanov, Trajče |
description | This paper is an effort for some different approach of Dostoevsky`s poetic concerning Bahtin`s interpretation. Namely, the paper is a critical overview of Bahtin`s interpretation on Dostoevsky`s “polyphonic novel” offering completely different interpretation of Dostoevsky`s work. Bahtin`s interpretation of Dostoevsky is quite revolutionary and logically consistent, but in our opinion, it misses out the crucial nature of Dostoevsky`s work. Our approach enables us to overcome the obstacles because of which Bahtin made that interpretation in the first place. Bahtin considered that “philosophical monologization” in interpretation of Dostoevsky`s poetic is inappropriate and that`s why he offered his structural analysis and the concept of “polyphonic novel”. But that kind of approach tears living unity of Dostoevsky’s novel – in best case, or lacks of understanding of Dostoevsky`s philosophy – in worst case. Our approach seeks solution in synthesis which is actually immanent in Dostoevsky`s dialectic. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_970552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>970552</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>970552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_9705523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjUx1TW2tLRggbMtIjgYeIuLswwMDIwNLczNDI05GUovTL0w5cLcCxMULsy5MO_CNAhz1oUFF2ZcWATEs0BcsNjECxMuLAWLzQUqnATkLQIJg7iLgIYsuDAfiKeCBC8sA4p2wDVOASpfCBSfB5SdBGTNujCDh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzyLi5hjh76CanpubnxGfllxblAcXjLc0NTE2NjAlK62CVTiwqyUzOSY1PyU-GKo0vSEkzBgBUoH0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stojanov, Trajče</creator><creatorcontrib>Stojanov, Trajče</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is an effort for some different approach of Dostoevsky`s poetic concerning Bahtin`s interpretation. Namely, the paper is a critical overview of Bahtin`s interpretation on Dostoevsky`s “polyphonic novel” offering completely different interpretation of Dostoevsky`s work. Bahtin`s interpretation of Dostoevsky is quite revolutionary and logically consistent, but in our opinion, it misses out the crucial nature of Dostoevsky`s work. Our approach enables us to overcome the obstacles because of which Bahtin made that interpretation in the first place. Bahtin considered that “philosophical monologization” in interpretation of Dostoevsky`s poetic is inappropriate and that`s why he offered his structural analysis and the concept of “polyphonic novel”. But that kind of approach tears living unity of Dostoevsky’s novel – in best case, or lacks of understanding of Dostoevsky`s philosophy – in worst case. Our approach seeks solution in synthesis which is actually immanent in Dostoevsky`s dialectic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2545-398X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2545-3998</identifier><language>eng ; mac</language><publisher>Универзитет »Гоце Делчев« - Штип</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Russian Literature ; Studies of Literature ; Theory of Literature</subject><ispartof>Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia), 2016, Vol.1 (2), p.115-126</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2016_62228.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stojanov, Trajče</creatorcontrib><title>ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ</title><title>Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia)</title><addtitle>Palimpsest, International Journal for Linguistic, Literary and Cultural Research</addtitle><description>This paper is an effort for some different approach of Dostoevsky`s poetic concerning Bahtin`s interpretation. Namely, the paper is a critical overview of Bahtin`s interpretation on Dostoevsky`s “polyphonic novel” offering completely different interpretation of Dostoevsky`s work. Bahtin`s interpretation of Dostoevsky is quite revolutionary and logically consistent, but in our opinion, it misses out the crucial nature of Dostoevsky`s work. Our approach enables us to overcome the obstacles because of which Bahtin made that interpretation in the first place. Bahtin considered that “philosophical monologization” in interpretation of Dostoevsky`s poetic is inappropriate and that`s why he offered his structural analysis and the concept of “polyphonic novel”. But that kind of approach tears living unity of Dostoevsky’s novel – in best case, or lacks of understanding of Dostoevsky`s philosophy – in worst case. Our approach seeks solution in synthesis which is actually immanent in Dostoevsky`s dialectic.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Russian Literature</subject><subject>Studies of Literature</subject><subject>Theory of Literature</subject><issn>2545-398X</issn><issn>2545-3998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjUx1TW2tLRggbMtIjgYeIuLswwMDIwNLczNDI05GUovTL0w5cLcCxMULsy5MO_CNAhz1oUFF2ZcWATEs0BcsNjECxMuLAWLzQUqnATkLQIJg7iLgIYsuDAfiKeCBC8sA4p2wDVOASpfCBSfB5SdBGTNujCDh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzyLi5hjh76CanpubnxGfllxblAcXjLc0NTE2NjAlK62CVTiwqyUzOSY1PyU-GKo0vSEkzBgBUoH0g</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Stojanov, Trajče</creator><general>Универзитет »Гоце Делчев« - Штип</general><general>University »Goce Delcev« - Stip</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ</title><author>Stojanov, Trajče</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_9705523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; mac</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Russian Literature</topic><topic>Studies of Literature</topic><topic>Theory of Literature</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stojanov, Trajče</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stojanov, Trajče</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ</atitle><jtitle>Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia)</jtitle><addtitle>Palimpsest, International Journal for Linguistic, Literary and Cultural Research</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>115-126</pages><issn>2545-398X</issn><eissn>2545-3998</eissn><abstract>This paper is an effort for some different approach of Dostoevsky`s poetic concerning Bahtin`s interpretation. Namely, the paper is a critical overview of Bahtin`s interpretation on Dostoevsky`s “polyphonic novel” offering completely different interpretation of Dostoevsky`s work. Bahtin`s interpretation of Dostoevsky is quite revolutionary and logically consistent, but in our opinion, it misses out the crucial nature of Dostoevsky`s work. Our approach enables us to overcome the obstacles because of which Bahtin made that interpretation in the first place. Bahtin considered that “philosophical monologization” in interpretation of Dostoevsky`s poetic is inappropriate and that`s why he offered his structural analysis and the concept of “polyphonic novel”. But that kind of approach tears living unity of Dostoevsky’s novel – in best case, or lacks of understanding of Dostoevsky`s philosophy – in worst case. Our approach seeks solution in synthesis which is actually immanent in Dostoevsky`s dialectic.</abstract><pub>Универзитет »Гоце Делчев« - Штип</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2545-398X |
ispartof | Palimpsest (Štip, North Macedonia), 2016, Vol.1 (2), p.115-126 |
issn | 2545-398X 2545-3998 |
language | eng ; mac |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_970552 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aesthetics Russian Literature Studies of Literature Theory of Literature |
title | ЕДНА МОЖНА КРИТИКА НА БАХТИНОВАТА ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА НА ДОСТОЕВСКИ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A35%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%95%D0%94%D0%9D%D0%90%20%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%96%D0%9D%D0%90%20%D0%9A%D0%A0%D0%98%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90%20%D0%9D%D0%90%20%D0%91%D0%90%D0%A5%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%92%D0%90%D0%A2%D0%90%20%D0%98%D0%9D%D0%A2%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%9F%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%A2%D0%90%D0%A6%D0%98%D0%88%D0%90%20%D0%9D%D0%90%20%D0%94%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%9E%D0%95%D0%92%D0%A1%D0%9A%D0%98&rft.jtitle=Palimpsest%20(%C5%A0tip,%20North%20Macedonia)&rft.au=Stojanov,%20Traj%C4%8De&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=115-126&rft.issn=2545-398X&rft.eissn=2545-3998&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E970552%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=970552&rfr_iscdi=true |