Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey

In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents thre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ESPES 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88
1. Verfasser: Orlando, Eleonora
Format: Artikel
Sprache:cze ; eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title ESPES
container_volume 10
creator Orlando, Eleonora
description In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_964657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>964657</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde67</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>964657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c209t-b899667d2d75005097d25a192fd8f6b6ce96bd1b1ae72220a6baf424dbcbb123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjs1KxDAUhYsgOIzzBi7yABaStEl73ZXB0YEZBBlcuAn5uXFaYjO0cdHH8Vl8MYsjrlydw-Hj41xkC1YUkDPG4CpbjWNHKeW1qLgQi6zZY590IJs24Eh070g6IjkcMQ4TiX7ebWpjf0ca8oynMJEUyWsM6euzJy9oR5yus0uvw4ir31xmh839Yf2Y754etutml1tOIeWmBpCyctxVglJBYa5CM-De1V4aaRGkccwwjRXnnGpptC956Yw1hvFimW3PWhd1p05D-66HSUXdqp8hDm9KD6m1AZV24B1wIZksS5BQ1xwk46KejQ5lNbtuzy6LGIPq4sfQz9f_BC5aBbKUolIn52f85l_8jBTfI-VqZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Orlando, Eleonora</creator><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><description>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1339-1119</identifier><language>cze ; eng</language><publisher>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; antirealism vs. realism about fiction ; fictional concept ; fictional name ; fictional narrative ; mental file</subject><ispartof>ESPES, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_61711.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2095</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><title>ESPES</title><addtitle>ESPES</addtitle><description>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>antirealism vs. realism about fiction</subject><subject>fictional concept</subject><subject>fictional name</subject><subject>fictional narrative</subject><subject>mental file</subject><issn>1339-1119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptjs1KxDAUhYsgOIzzBi7yABaStEl73ZXB0YEZBBlcuAn5uXFaYjO0cdHH8Vl8MYsjrlydw-Hj41xkC1YUkDPG4CpbjWNHKeW1qLgQi6zZY590IJs24Eh070g6IjkcMQ4TiX7ebWpjf0ca8oynMJEUyWsM6euzJy9oR5yus0uvw4ir31xmh839Yf2Y754etutml1tOIeWmBpCyctxVglJBYa5CM-De1V4aaRGkccwwjRXnnGpptC956Yw1hvFimW3PWhd1p05D-66HSUXdqp8hDm9KD6m1AZV24B1wIZksS5BQ1xwk46KejQ5lNbtuzy6LGIPq4sfQz9f_BC5aBbKUolIn52f85l_8jBTfI-VqZA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Orlando, Eleonora</creator><general>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</general><general>Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia and Institute of Aesthetics and Art Culture, Faculty of Arts, University of Presov</general><general>University of Presov, Faculty of Arts</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><author>Orlando, Eleonora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209t-b899667d2d75005097d25a192fd8f6b6ce96bd1b1ae72220a6baf424dbcbb123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze ; eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>antirealism vs. realism about fiction</topic><topic>fictional concept</topic><topic>fictional name</topic><topic>fictional narrative</topic><topic>mental file</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>ESPES</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orlando, Eleonora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</atitle><jtitle>ESPES</jtitle><addtitle>ESPES</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>79-88</pages><eissn>1339-1119</eissn><abstract>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</abstract><pub>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</pub><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1339-1119
ispartof ESPES, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88
issn 1339-1119
language cze ; eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_964657
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Aesthetics
antirealism vs. realism about fiction
fictional concept
fictional name
fictional narrative
mental file
title Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20Files%20and%20the%20Theory%20of%20Fiction:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Zolt%C3%A1n%20Vecsey&rft.jtitle=ESPES&rft.au=Orlando,%20Eleonora&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=79-88&rft.eissn=1339-1119&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E964657%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=964657&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde67&rfr_iscdi=true