Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents thre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ESPES 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | cze ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | ESPES |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Orlando, Eleonora |
description | In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_964657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>964657</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde67</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>964657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c209t-b899667d2d75005097d25a192fd8f6b6ce96bd1b1ae72220a6baf424dbcbb123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjs1KxDAUhYsgOIzzBi7yABaStEl73ZXB0YEZBBlcuAn5uXFaYjO0cdHH8Vl8MYsjrlydw-Hj41xkC1YUkDPG4CpbjWNHKeW1qLgQi6zZY590IJs24Eh070g6IjkcMQ4TiX7ebWpjf0ca8oynMJEUyWsM6euzJy9oR5yus0uvw4ir31xmh839Yf2Y754etutml1tOIeWmBpCyctxVglJBYa5CM-De1V4aaRGkccwwjRXnnGpptC956Yw1hvFimW3PWhd1p05D-66HSUXdqp8hDm9KD6m1AZV24B1wIZksS5BQ1xwk46KejQ5lNbtuzy6LGIPq4sfQz9f_BC5aBbKUolIn52f85l_8jBTfI-VqZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Orlando, Eleonora</creator><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><description>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1339-1119</identifier><language>cze ; eng</language><publisher>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; antirealism vs. realism about fiction ; fictional concept ; fictional name ; fictional narrative ; mental file</subject><ispartof>ESPES, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_61711.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2095</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><title>ESPES</title><addtitle>ESPES</addtitle><description>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>antirealism vs. realism about fiction</subject><subject>fictional concept</subject><subject>fictional name</subject><subject>fictional narrative</subject><subject>mental file</subject><issn>1339-1119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptjs1KxDAUhYsgOIzzBi7yABaStEl73ZXB0YEZBBlcuAn5uXFaYjO0cdHH8Vl8MYsjrlydw-Hj41xkC1YUkDPG4CpbjWNHKeW1qLgQi6zZY590IJs24Eh070g6IjkcMQ4TiX7ebWpjf0ca8oynMJEUyWsM6euzJy9oR5yus0uvw4ir31xmh839Yf2Y754etutml1tOIeWmBpCyctxVglJBYa5CM-De1V4aaRGkccwwjRXnnGpptC956Yw1hvFimW3PWhd1p05D-66HSUXdqp8hDm9KD6m1AZV24B1wIZksS5BQ1xwk46KejQ5lNbtuzy6LGIPq4sfQz9f_BC5aBbKUolIn52f85l_8jBTfI-VqZA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Orlando, Eleonora</creator><general>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</general><general>Society for Aesthetics in Slovakia and Institute of Aesthetics and Art Culture, Faculty of Arts, University of Presov</general><general>University of Presov, Faculty of Arts</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</title><author>Orlando, Eleonora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c209t-b899667d2d75005097d25a192fd8f6b6ce96bd1b1ae72220a6baf424dbcbb123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze ; eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>antirealism vs. realism about fiction</topic><topic>fictional concept</topic><topic>fictional name</topic><topic>fictional narrative</topic><topic>mental file</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>ESPES</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orlando, Eleonora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey</atitle><jtitle>ESPES</jtitle><addtitle>ESPES</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>79-88</pages><eissn>1339-1119</eissn><abstract>In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.</abstract><pub>Spoločnosť pre estetiku na Slovensku a Inštitút estetiky a umeleckej kultúry Filozofickej fakulty Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove</pub><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1339-1119 |
ispartof | ESPES, 2021-06, Vol.10 (1), p.79-88 |
issn | 1339-1119 |
language | cze ; eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_964657 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Aesthetics antirealism vs. realism about fiction fictional concept fictional name fictional narrative mental file |
title | Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20Files%20and%20the%20Theory%20of%20Fiction:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Zolt%C3%A1n%20Vecsey&rft.jtitle=ESPES&rft.au=Orlando,%20Eleonora&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=79-88&rft.eissn=1339-1119&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E964657%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=964657&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ad9fd92561644969882961258bafde67&rfr_iscdi=true |