Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului
Resulting from the frontal collision of two criminal law systems at the level of the legislation, theory and practice of criminal law, the crisis of the (science of) criminal law in Romania is a crisis of the „technical-legal method”. This crisis resulted from the lack of thoroughly analysing the fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dreptul (București) 2021 (1), p.138-153 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rum |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | Dreptul (București) |
container_volume | |
creator | Avrigeanu, Tudor |
description | Resulting from the frontal collision of two criminal law systems at the level of the legislation, theory and practice of criminal law, the crisis of the (science of) criminal law in Romania is a crisis of the „technical-legal method”. This crisis resulted from the lack of thoroughly analysing the foundations of this method configured in terms of general juridical theory in the context of the Historical School of Law from Germany, received in the particular matter of the theory of criminal law thanks to the contribution of the Italian criminal specialists (Arturo Rocco) and which became a traditional method of the Romanian science of criminal law due to its reception in Italy by Vintilă Dongoroz. In the broader plan of the general theory of law, the same crisis proves to be a crisis of the idea of science of law, explicable by the vicissitudes of the reception of the Historical School of Law in Romania over the last 150 years. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_923425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>923425</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>923425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c868-261c05cad3d6fe49d151902b985faab1d7703d00ee52b055b8cb9b0be3716d413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjstKAzEUhmehYKl9AxcRtx3IZTKTWUrxBlU33Q8nl8EMaTMmGXDvU4iv46KPZaQFXfjD4Sy-7xz-k2JGMBElrhg_KxYxDjhHUJ4zK4YnH1MAtIU3uwWkJjfCJXo0yWtAybzsrPLlMAWrrfp6X6L9R7J2t_8EpIMZ0-Qmi0azA5eJzaM8OEA2Jh9-DtAf77w47cFFszjuebG5vdms7sv1893D6npdKlGLktZEYa5AM133pmo14aTFVLaC9wCS6KbBTGNsDKcScy6Fkq3E0rCG1LoibF5cHd6Owb9OJqZu8FPIDWNHOSGsaQQW2bo4WMoY736VlrKK8oyX_2IIySpnOu3VUe1G3bNvAvxw2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511377808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Avrigeanu, Tudor</creator><creatorcontrib>Avrigeanu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><description>Resulting from the frontal collision of two criminal law systems at the level of the legislation, theory and practice of criminal law, the crisis of the (science of) criminal law in Romania is a crisis of the „technical-legal method”. This crisis resulted from the lack of thoroughly analysing the foundations of this method configured in terms of general juridical theory in the context of the Historical School of Law from Germany, received in the particular matter of the theory of criminal law thanks to the contribution of the Italian criminal specialists (Arturo Rocco) and which became a traditional method of the Romanian science of criminal law due to its reception in Italy by Vintilă Dongoroz. In the broader plan of the general theory of law, the same crisis proves to be a crisis of the idea of science of law, explicable by the vicissitudes of the reception of the Historical School of Law in Romania over the last 150 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-0435</identifier><language>eng ; rum</language><publisher>Bucharest: Union of Jurists of Romania</publisher><subject>Criminal Law ; History of Law ; Law</subject><ispartof>Dreptul (București), 2021 (1), p.138-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright Union of Jurists of Romania 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_58481.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21341</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avrigeanu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><title>Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului</title><title>Dreptul (București)</title><addtitle>Law review</addtitle><description>Resulting from the frontal collision of two criminal law systems at the level of the legislation, theory and practice of criminal law, the crisis of the (science of) criminal law in Romania is a crisis of the „technical-legal method”. This crisis resulted from the lack of thoroughly analysing the foundations of this method configured in terms of general juridical theory in the context of the Historical School of Law from Germany, received in the particular matter of the theory of criminal law thanks to the contribution of the Italian criminal specialists (Arturo Rocco) and which became a traditional method of the Romanian science of criminal law due to its reception in Italy by Vintilă Dongoroz. In the broader plan of the general theory of law, the same crisis proves to be a crisis of the idea of science of law, explicable by the vicissitudes of the reception of the Historical School of Law in Romania over the last 150 years.</description><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>History of Law</subject><subject>Law</subject><issn>1018-0435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjstKAzEUhmehYKl9AxcRtx3IZTKTWUrxBlU33Q8nl8EMaTMmGXDvU4iv46KPZaQFXfjD4Sy-7xz-k2JGMBElrhg_KxYxDjhHUJ4zK4YnH1MAtIU3uwWkJjfCJXo0yWtAybzsrPLlMAWrrfp6X6L9R7J2t_8EpIMZ0-Qmi0azA5eJzaM8OEA2Jh9-DtAf77w47cFFszjuebG5vdms7sv1893D6npdKlGLktZEYa5AM133pmo14aTFVLaC9wCS6KbBTGNsDKcScy6Fkq3E0rCG1LoibF5cHd6Owb9OJqZu8FPIDWNHOSGsaQQW2bo4WMoY736VlrKK8oyX_2IIySpnOu3VUe1G3bNvAvxw2g</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Avrigeanu, Tudor</creator><general>Union of Jurists of Romania</general><general>Uniunea Juriștilor din România</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului</title><author>Avrigeanu, Tudor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c868-261c05cad3d6fe49d151902b985faab1d7703d00ee52b055b8cb9b0be3716d413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rum</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>History of Law</topic><topic>Law</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avrigeanu, Tudor</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avrigeanu, Tudor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului</atitle><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle><addtitle>Law review</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>138-153</pages><issn>1018-0435</issn><abstract>Resulting from the frontal collision of two criminal law systems at the level of the legislation, theory and practice of criminal law, the crisis of the (science of) criminal law in Romania is a crisis of the „technical-legal method”. This crisis resulted from the lack of thoroughly analysing the foundations of this method configured in terms of general juridical theory in the context of the Historical School of Law from Germany, received in the particular matter of the theory of criminal law thanks to the contribution of the Italian criminal specialists (Arturo Rocco) and which became a traditional method of the Romanian science of criminal law due to its reception in Italy by Vintilă Dongoroz. In the broader plan of the general theory of law, the same crisis proves to be a crisis of the idea of science of law, explicable by the vicissitudes of the reception of the Historical School of Law in Romania over the last 150 years.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Union of Jurists of Romania</pub><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1018-0435 |
ispartof | Dreptul (București), 2021 (1), p.138-153 |
issn | 1018-0435 |
language | eng ; rum |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_923425 |
source | Central and Eastern European Online Library; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Criminal Law History of Law Law |
title | Nostra maxima culpa! Metoda tehnico-juridică, știința dreptului penal și școala istorică a dreptului |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A08%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nostra%20maxima%20culpa!%20Metoda%20tehnico-juridic%C4%83,%20%C8%99tiin%C8%9Ba%20dreptului%20penal%20%C8%99i%20%C8%99coala%20istoric%C4%83%20a%20dreptului&rft.jtitle=Dreptul%20(Bucure%C8%99ti)&rft.au=Avrigeanu,%20Tudor&rft.date=2021&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=138-153&rft.issn=1018-0435&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E923425%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511377808&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=923425&rfr_iscdi=true |