Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg

In November 1860, the Parliament of Hamburg decided not to keep the long outdated facility of closing the city gates between sunset and sunrise. The Middle Ages were over. // To this day, however, it remains to be explained that the decision to permanently open the gates was by no means unanimous: T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anachronia 2018 (14), p.60-70
1. Verfasser: Kloss, Dominik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 14
container_start_page 60
container_title Anachronia
container_volume
creator Kloss, Dominik
description In November 1860, the Parliament of Hamburg decided not to keep the long outdated facility of closing the city gates between sunset and sunrise. The Middle Ages were over. // To this day, however, it remains to be explained that the decision to permanently open the gates was by no means unanimous: The council, now operating as the Senate under the new constitution, had pleaded for maintaining the gate lock - as did 45 MPs and thus around one Quarter of the ultimately decisive citizenship. In any case, even after 1861, it was still possible in these committees - despite the iron grilles that remained open at night - to prevent the abolition of the inner-city excise line and the implementation of freedom of trade for a few more years. Where did the resistance come from?
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_873626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>873626</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>873626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_8736263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLsKwjAYhTMoWC9v4JBRQaW0tdZRRHFX0K2k7d8mkv6RNO3g4NP4Jr6Y8TIKTudwzsfXIo67DMKpHyxOHdKtqrPrziMvCBxy22oQHIQZAY4pF2hAU644ID0-7lICzuiqTETDbL3aVSDNLNIoXSpb8AUybpOXNRbvD6G-WqMU6UuzNywzCeRQGVFY5OPYsTKpddEn7ZzJCgbf7JHhdnNY76YpgJLxWdUa7R5HCz_0Qr9HJj9vpo1IJcSZSr9ofMly_4_tCQTIXDo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Kloss, Dominik</creator><creatorcontrib>Kloss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><description>In November 1860, the Parliament of Hamburg decided not to keep the long outdated facility of closing the city gates between sunset and sunrise. The Middle Ages were over. // To this day, however, it remains to be explained that the decision to permanently open the gates was by no means unanimous: The council, now operating as the Senate under the new constitution, had pleaded for maintaining the gate lock - as did 45 MPs and thus around one Quarter of the ultimately decisive citizenship. In any case, even after 1861, it was still possible in these committees - despite the iron grilles that remained open at night - to prevent the abolition of the inner-city excise line and the implementation of freedom of trade for a few more years. Where did the resistance come from?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0946-347X</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>Eve-Marie Kallen</publisher><subject>19th Century ; Local History / Microhistory</subject><ispartof>Anachronia, 2018 (14), p.60-70</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_46157.gif</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,21360</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kloss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><title>Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg</title><title>Anachronia</title><addtitle>Anachronia</addtitle><description>In November 1860, the Parliament of Hamburg decided not to keep the long outdated facility of closing the city gates between sunset and sunrise. The Middle Ages were over. // To this day, however, it remains to be explained that the decision to permanently open the gates was by no means unanimous: The council, now operating as the Senate under the new constitution, had pleaded for maintaining the gate lock - as did 45 MPs and thus around one Quarter of the ultimately decisive citizenship. In any case, even after 1861, it was still possible in these committees - despite the iron grilles that remained open at night - to prevent the abolition of the inner-city excise line and the implementation of freedom of trade for a few more years. Where did the resistance come from?</description><subject>19th Century</subject><subject>Local History / Microhistory</subject><issn>0946-347X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLsKwjAYhTMoWC9v4JBRQaW0tdZRRHFX0K2k7d8mkv6RNO3g4NP4Jr6Y8TIKTudwzsfXIo67DMKpHyxOHdKtqrPrziMvCBxy22oQHIQZAY4pF2hAU644ID0-7lICzuiqTETDbL3aVSDNLNIoXSpb8AUybpOXNRbvD6G-WqMU6UuzNywzCeRQGVFY5OPYsTKpddEn7ZzJCgbf7JHhdnNY76YpgJLxWdUa7R5HCz_0Qr9HJj9vpo1IJcSZSr9ofMly_4_tCQTIXDo</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Kloss, Dominik</creator><general>Eve-Marie Kallen</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg</title><author>Kloss, Dominik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_8736263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>19th Century</topic><topic>Local History / Microhistory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kloss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Anachronia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kloss, Dominik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg</atitle><jtitle>Anachronia</jtitle><addtitle>Anachronia</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><issue>14</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>60-70</pages><issn>0946-347X</issn><abstract>In November 1860, the Parliament of Hamburg decided not to keep the long outdated facility of closing the city gates between sunset and sunrise. The Middle Ages were over. // To this day, however, it remains to be explained that the decision to permanently open the gates was by no means unanimous: The council, now operating as the Senate under the new constitution, had pleaded for maintaining the gate lock - as did 45 MPs and thus around one Quarter of the ultimately decisive citizenship. In any case, even after 1861, it was still possible in these committees - despite the iron grilles that remained open at night - to prevent the abolition of the inner-city excise line and the implementation of freedom of trade for a few more years. Where did the resistance come from?</abstract><pub>Eve-Marie Kallen</pub><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0946-347X
ispartof Anachronia, 2018 (14), p.60-70
issn 0946-347X
language eng ; ger
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_873626
source Central and Eastern European Online Library
subjects 19th Century
Local History / Microhistory
title Freiheit(en) hinter hohen Wällen. Ambivalenzen in der vormodernen Wahrnehmung der neuzeitlichen Stadtbefestigungen in Hamburg
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A53%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freiheit(en)%20hinter%20hohen%20W%C3%A4llen.%20Ambivalenzen%20in%20der%20vormodernen%20Wahrnehmung%20der%20neuzeitlichen%20Stadtbefestigungen%20in%20Hamburg&rft.jtitle=Anachronia&rft.au=Kloss,%20Dominik&rft.date=2018&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=60-70&rft.issn=0946-347X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E873626%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=873626&rfr_iscdi=true