PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ
Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contribu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 (23) |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ |
container_volume | VI |
creator | Vida, Grigore |
description | Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_82166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>82166</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>82166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_821663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjAz1zU1NDZlYeA0tDAx1DU0MTDkYOAtLs4yAAJjIwsLMzNOBv2AIH8nH1dfRwXXKP8Q1yDPYN9Qn1BPhcN9fgpH54V4evodXeSo4OTo7O_n6eh3pImHgTUtMac4lRdKczNIu7mGOHvoJqem5ufEZ-WXFuUBxeMtjAzNzIzxywIAh-cuAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vida, Grigore</creator><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><description>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1841-1401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2067-5135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vasile Goldis University Press</publisher><subject>Literary Texts</subject><ispartof>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ, 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2010_6039.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><title>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</title><addtitle>Studies of Science and Culture</addtitle><description>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</description><subject>Literary Texts</subject><issn>1841-1401</issn><issn>2067-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjAz1zU1NDZlYeA0tDAx1DU0MTDkYOAtLs4yAAJjIwsLMzNOBv2AIH8nH1dfRwXXKP8Q1yDPYN9Qn1BPhcN9fgpH54V4evodXeSo4OTo7O_n6eh3pImHgTUtMac4lRdKczNIu7mGOHvoJqem5ufEZ-WXFuUBxeMtjAzNzIzxywIAh-cuAw</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Vida, Grigore</creator><general>Vasile Goldis University Press</general><general>Editura Universităţii Vasile Goldiş</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><author>Vida, Grigore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_821663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Literary Texts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vida, Grigore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</atitle><jtitle>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</jtitle><addtitle>Studies of Science and Culture</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>VI</volume><issue>4 (23)</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>133-143</pages><issn>1841-1401</issn><eissn>2067-5135</eissn><abstract>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</abstract><pub>Vasile Goldis University Press</pub><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1841-1401 |
ispartof | Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ, 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143 |
issn | 1841-1401 2067-5135 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_82166 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Literary Texts |
title | PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROBLEMA%20EZOTERISMULUI%20%C3%8EN%20%C5%9ETIIN%C5%A2A%20BACONIAN%C4%82&rft.jtitle=Studii%20de%20%C5%9Ftiin%C5%A3%C7%8E%20%C5%9Fi%20cultur%C7%8E&rft.au=Vida,%20Grigore&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=VI&rft.issue=4%20(23)&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=133-143&rft.issn=1841-1401&rft.eissn=2067-5135&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E82166%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=82166&rfr_iscdi=true |