PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ

Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contribu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143
1. Verfasser: Vida, Grigore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 4 (23)
container_start_page 133
container_title Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ
container_volume VI
creator Vida, Grigore
description Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_82166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>82166</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>82166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_821663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjAz1zU1NDZlYeA0tDAx1DU0MTDkYOAtLs4yAAJjIwsLMzNOBv2AIH8nH1dfRwXXKP8Q1yDPYN9Qn1BPhcN9fgpH54V4evodXeSo4OTo7O_n6eh3pImHgTUtMac4lRdKczNIu7mGOHvoJqem5ufEZ-WXFuUBxeMtjAzNzIzxywIAh-cuAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vida, Grigore</creator><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><description>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1841-1401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2067-5135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vasile Goldis University Press</publisher><subject>Literary Texts</subject><ispartof>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ, 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2010_6039.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><title>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</title><addtitle>Studies of Science and Culture</addtitle><description>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</description><subject>Literary Texts</subject><issn>1841-1401</issn><issn>2067-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjAz1zU1NDZlYeA0tDAx1DU0MTDkYOAtLs4yAAJjIwsLMzNOBv2AIH8nH1dfRwXXKP8Q1yDPYN9Qn1BPhcN9fgpH54V4evodXeSo4OTo7O_n6eh3pImHgTUtMac4lRdKczNIu7mGOHvoJqem5ufEZ-WXFuUBxeMtjAzNzIzxywIAh-cuAw</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Vida, Grigore</creator><general>Vasile Goldis University Press</general><general>Editura Universităţii Vasile Goldiş</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</title><author>Vida, Grigore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_821663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Literary Texts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vida, Grigore</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vida, Grigore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ</atitle><jtitle>Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ</jtitle><addtitle>Studies of Science and Culture</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>VI</volume><issue>4 (23)</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>133-143</pages><issn>1841-1401</issn><eissn>2067-5135</eissn><abstract>Francis Bacon is commonly regarded as someone who shifted arcane knowledge into the public domain (and dispelled the aura of secrecy that surrounded the gestating ‘Baconian sciences’, to use Kuhn’s term) – a general movement of the seventeenth century in which he plays an important part. He contributed thus to our present image of science as an open, public enterprise. By focusing on the ‘New Atlantis’, as well as on other texts, I try to show that Bacon’s science is still esoteric, while esotericism is not to be understood as some form of obscurantism, but as having a positive function, namely the protection against the dangers that the advancement of knowledge (power) implies. Esotericism appears to be somehow inescapable even to modern science; the motivations behind it are involuntary as well as voluntary, a double aspect that I will try to point out in Bacon as well.</abstract><pub>Vasile Goldis University Press</pub><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1841-1401
ispartof Studii de ştiinţǎ şi culturǎ, 2010, Vol.VI (4 (23)), p.133-143
issn 1841-1401
2067-5135
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_82166
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Literary Texts
title PROBLEMA EZOTERISMULUI ÎN ŞTIINŢA BACONIANĂ
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROBLEMA%20EZOTERISMULUI%20%C3%8EN%20%C5%9ETIIN%C5%A2A%20BACONIAN%C4%82&rft.jtitle=Studii%20de%20%C5%9Ftiin%C5%A3%C7%8E%20%C5%9Fi%20cultur%C7%8E&rft.au=Vida,%20Grigore&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=VI&rft.issue=4%20(23)&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=133-143&rft.issn=1841-1401&rft.eissn=2067-5135&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E82166%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=82166&rfr_iscdi=true