In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”

In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arhe (Novi Sad) 2007 (8), p.195-212
1. Verfasser: Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 8
container_start_page 195
container_title Arhe (Novi Sad)
container_volume
creator Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz
description In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_792417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>792417</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>792417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_7924173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjM0KgkAURocoSMo3aHFfQNAx_9ZSFLSIbC-D3XBM5tLMuGjnawT1cj5JBu07mwPng2_CHB7FvhdFWThlTpBy3_OzKJ0z15jGH0njmPPEYbhXUKDQVQ10hQMZC3mNeJMKjQGhYK-spktXWUkKLMERLWooWhp1kc1t6J8Ghv6Va2nlvcPvTf5QshItnFAYUkP_XrLZVbQG3Z8XbLXdnPOdVyFSWzbUaTX2Msn4OkjCP_MH3BlGLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creator><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><description>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1820-0958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2560-5593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</publisher><subject>Contemporary Philosophy ; Epistemology ; Ontology</subject><ispartof>Arhe (Novi Sad), 2007 (8), p.195-212</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21341</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><title>Arhe (Novi Sad)</title><addtitle>Arhe</addtitle><description>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</description><subject>Contemporary Philosophy</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><issn>1820-0958</issn><issn>2560-5593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjM0KgkAURocoSMo3aHFfQNAx_9ZSFLSIbC-D3XBM5tLMuGjnawT1cj5JBu07mwPng2_CHB7FvhdFWThlTpBy3_OzKJ0z15jGH0njmPPEYbhXUKDQVQ10hQMZC3mNeJMKjQGhYK-spktXWUkKLMERLWooWhp1kc1t6J8Ghv6Va2nlvcPvTf5QshItnFAYUkP_XrLZVbQG3Z8XbLXdnPOdVyFSWzbUaTX2Msn4OkjCP_MH3BlGLg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creator><general>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</general><general>Филозофски факултет, Универзитет у Новом Саду</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><author>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_7924173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Contemporary Philosophy</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Arhe (Novi Sad)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</atitle><jtitle>Arhe (Novi Sad)</jtitle><addtitle>Arhe</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>8</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>195-212</pages><issn>1820-0958</issn><eissn>2560-5593</eissn><abstract>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</abstract><pub>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</pub><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1820-0958
ispartof Arhe (Novi Sad), 2007 (8), p.195-212
issn 1820-0958
2560-5593
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_792417
source Central and Eastern European Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Contemporary Philosophy
Epistemology
Ontology
title In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Search%20of%20Lost%20Cheekiness%20an%20Introduction%20to%20Peter%20Sloterdijk%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%9CCritique%20of%20Cynical%20Reason%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Arhe%20(Novi%20Sad)&rft.au=Sorgner,%20Stefan%20Lorenz&rft.date=2007&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=195-212&rft.issn=1820-0958&rft.eissn=2560-5593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E792417%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=792417&rfr_iscdi=true