In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”
In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arhe (Novi Sad) 2007 (8), p.195-212 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 195 |
container_title | Arhe (Novi Sad) |
container_volume | |
creator | Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz |
description | In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_792417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>792417</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>792417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_7924173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjM0KgkAURocoSMo3aHFfQNAx_9ZSFLSIbC-D3XBM5tLMuGjnawT1cj5JBu07mwPng2_CHB7FvhdFWThlTpBy3_OzKJ0z15jGH0njmPPEYbhXUKDQVQ10hQMZC3mNeJMKjQGhYK-spktXWUkKLMERLWooWhp1kc1t6J8Ghv6Va2nlvcPvTf5QshItnFAYUkP_XrLZVbQG3Z8XbLXdnPOdVyFSWzbUaTX2Msn4OkjCP_MH3BlGLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creator><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><description>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1820-0958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2560-5593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</publisher><subject>Contemporary Philosophy ; Epistemology ; Ontology</subject><ispartof>Arhe (Novi Sad), 2007 (8), p.195-212</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21341</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><title>Arhe (Novi Sad)</title><addtitle>Arhe</addtitle><description>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</description><subject>Contemporary Philosophy</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><issn>1820-0958</issn><issn>2560-5593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjM0KgkAURocoSMo3aHFfQNAx_9ZSFLSIbC-D3XBM5tLMuGjnawT1cj5JBu07mwPng2_CHB7FvhdFWThlTpBy3_OzKJ0z15jGH0njmPPEYbhXUKDQVQ10hQMZC3mNeJMKjQGhYK-spktXWUkKLMERLWooWhp1kc1t6J8Ghv6Va2nlvcPvTf5QshItnFAYUkP_XrLZVbQG3Z8XbLXdnPOdVyFSWzbUaTX2Msn4OkjCP_MH3BlGLg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creator><general>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</general><general>Филозофски факултет, Универзитет у Новом Саду</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</title><author>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_7924173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Contemporary Philosophy</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Arhe (Novi Sad)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason”</atitle><jtitle>Arhe (Novi Sad)</jtitle><addtitle>Arhe</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>8</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>195-212</pages><issn>1820-0958</issn><eissn>2560-5593</eissn><abstract>In the article, “On Search of Lost Cheekiness: An Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s ‘Critique of Cynical Reason’” I put forward a critical summary of Sloterdijk’s first major work which established his reputation as a leading German philosopher. My article is structured as follows: Firstly, I analyse Sloterdijk’s understanding of philosophy where I explain that he is concerned with the questions of life, and of values (if we take values not only to refer to general principles, but also include attitudes towards life) and that one could say he is one of Nietzsche’s philosophers of the future, who are the inventors of new values and do not believe in truth anymore. Th e main focus of Sloterdijk’s book lies in the interpretation of the Enlightenment, and our current cultural situation. Hence, I put forward my reading of Sloterdijk’s understanding of the Enlightenment period (part two), which leads me to an analysis of the notion of ‘Cynicism’ (part three). His notion of ‘Cynicism’ represents the attitude towards life which is supposed to be prevalent in the present and which is personified best by the Frankfurt School. Sloterdijk is extremely critical of this attitude and puts forward ‘Kynicism’ as an alternative to ‘Cynicism’. Finally, I critically interpret Sloterdijk’s notion of ‘Kynicism’.</abstract><pub>Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad</pub><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1820-0958 |
ispartof | Arhe (Novi Sad), 2007 (8), p.195-212 |
issn | 1820-0958 2560-5593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_792417 |
source | Central and Eastern European Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Contemporary Philosophy Epistemology Ontology |
title | In Search of Lost Cheekiness an Introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s “Critique of Cynical Reason” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Search%20of%20Lost%20Cheekiness%20an%20Introduction%20to%20Peter%20Sloterdijk%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%9CCritique%20of%20Cynical%20Reason%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Arhe%20(Novi%20Sad)&rft.au=Sorgner,%20Stefan%20Lorenz&rft.date=2007&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=195-212&rft.issn=1820-0958&rft.eissn=2560-5593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E792417%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=792417&rfr_iscdi=true |