Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.)
This commentary presents an analysis of the court’s holding concerning the highly popular phenomenon of metal detecting, in the context of historical/cultural artifacts. According to the applicable law, searching for historical artifacts can only take place after obtaining the consent of the voivode...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Santander Art & Culture Law Review 2018, Vol.4 (1), p.97-106 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng ; pol |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 106 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 97 |
| container_title | Santander Art & Culture Law Review |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Olech, Agnieszka |
| description | This commentary presents an analysis of the court’s holding concerning the highly popular phenomenon of metal detecting, in the context of historical/cultural artifacts. According to the applicable law, searching for historical artifacts can only
take place after obtaining the consent of the voivodeship monuments’ conservator; however, this duty is not respected in the majority of cases. Moreover, such searches often lead to the destruction of archaeological sites and illegal excavation of movable artefacts. The District Court in Tomaszów Mazowiecki pointed out that searching for historical/cultural artifacts using a metal detector shows all the features of a criminal offense regulated in Art. 108, the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments. This offense is typified as damaging or destroying a monument. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.005.9766 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_789999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>789999</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>789999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1686-89a88060045aadaa67ae9dc396b774fcfb43bda5a862a603bdcbda159ffe3a8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjcFKw0AQhoMoWKpvIDjgRcGku9nN7O5RitZiUWgreCubZFPSptmabQjm7pv5YCZUcC7z_fwfM553TUnAOYpRyCNCIvKxeJ0HVAYdB0ognniDvvH76rRjpqgvlBLn3qVzG0JIqJASjgOvmRTWaUgt2Ko1SWvKXMPi5zutYW42trSNWVtoYGl32rW2yQ3M6tgUbpvvoIW010Mo6kOvhYQiVHZbw637WpcB6O0BplN4AcRwRPk9lLnZ13ER3F14Z5kunLn820Pv_elxOX72Z2-T6fhh5icUJfpSaSkJEsIjrVOtUWij0oQpjIXgWZLFnMWpjrTEUCPpOOkijVSWGaalZkPv5nh3X9nP2rjDamPrquxersKIKoWCUdZZV0crMcYW_4qQqhv2C2_qaOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519967313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Olech, Agnieszka</creator><creatorcontrib>Olech, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><description>This commentary presents an analysis of the court’s holding concerning the highly popular phenomenon of metal detecting, in the context of historical/cultural artifacts. According to the applicable law, searching for historical artifacts can only
take place after obtaining the consent of the voivodeship monuments’ conservator; however, this duty is not respected in the majority of cases. Moreover, such searches often lead to the destruction of archaeological sites and illegal excavation of movable artefacts. The District Court in Tomaszów Mazowiecki pointed out that searching for historical/cultural artifacts using a metal detector shows all the features of a criminal offense regulated in Art. 108, the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments. This offense is typified as damaging or destroying a monument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2391-7997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2450-050X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.005.9766</identifier><language>eng ; pol</language><publisher>Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Court case ; Criminal Law ; Cultural history ; Evaluation research ; State court decisions</subject><ispartof>Santander Art & Culture Law Review, 2018, Vol.4 (1), p.97-106</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_49079.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olech, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><title>Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.)</title><title>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</title><addtitle>Santander Art and Culture Law Review</addtitle><description>This commentary presents an analysis of the court’s holding concerning the highly popular phenomenon of metal detecting, in the context of historical/cultural artifacts. According to the applicable law, searching for historical artifacts can only
take place after obtaining the consent of the voivodeship monuments’ conservator; however, this duty is not respected in the majority of cases. Moreover, such searches often lead to the destruction of archaeological sites and illegal excavation of movable artefacts. The District Court in Tomaszów Mazowiecki pointed out that searching for historical/cultural artifacts using a metal detector shows all the features of a criminal offense regulated in Art. 108, the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments. This offense is typified as damaging or destroying a monument.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Court case</subject><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Evaluation research</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><issn>2391-7997</issn><issn>2450-050X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjcFKw0AQhoMoWKpvIDjgRcGku9nN7O5RitZiUWgreCubZFPSptmabQjm7pv5YCZUcC7z_fwfM553TUnAOYpRyCNCIvKxeJ0HVAYdB0ognniDvvH76rRjpqgvlBLn3qVzG0JIqJASjgOvmRTWaUgt2Ko1SWvKXMPi5zutYW42trSNWVtoYGl32rW2yQ3M6tgUbpvvoIW010Mo6kOvhYQiVHZbw637WpcB6O0BplN4AcRwRPk9lLnZ13ER3F14Z5kunLn820Pv_elxOX72Z2-T6fhh5icUJfpSaSkJEsIjrVOtUWij0oQpjIXgWZLFnMWpjrTEUCPpOOkijVSWGaalZkPv5nh3X9nP2rjDamPrquxersKIKoWCUdZZV0crMcYW_4qQqhv2C2_qaOk</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Olech, Agnieszka</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</general><general>Jagiellonian University Press</general><general>Jagiellonian University-Jagiellonian University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.)</title><author>Olech, Agnieszka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1686-89a88060045aadaa67ae9dc396b774fcfb43bda5a862a603bdcbda159ffe3a8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; pol</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Court case</topic><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Evaluation research</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olech, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olech, Agnieszka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.)</atitle><jtitle>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</jtitle><addtitle>Santander Art and Culture Law Review</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>97-106</pages><issn>2391-7997</issn><eissn>2450-050X</eissn><abstract>This commentary presents an analysis of the court’s holding concerning the highly popular phenomenon of metal detecting, in the context of historical/cultural artifacts. According to the applicable law, searching for historical artifacts can only
take place after obtaining the consent of the voivodeship monuments’ conservator; however, this duty is not respected in the majority of cases. Moreover, such searches often lead to the destruction of archaeological sites and illegal excavation of movable artefacts. The District Court in Tomaszów Mazowiecki pointed out that searching for historical/cultural artifacts using a metal detector shows all the features of a criminal offense regulated in Art. 108, the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments. This offense is typified as damaging or destroying a monument.</abstract><cop>Krakow</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</pub><doi>10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.005.9766</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2391-7997 |
| ispartof | Santander Art & Culture Law Review, 2018, Vol.4 (1), p.97-106 |
| issn | 2391-7997 2450-050X |
| language | eng ; pol |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_789999 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Archaeology Court case Criminal Law Cultural history Evaluation research State court decisions |
| title | Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Rejonowego w Tomaszowie Lubelskim z dnia 2 lutego 2016 roku (sygn. akt II K 662/14, niepubl.) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glosa%20do%20orzeczenia%20S%C4%85du%20Rejonowego%20w%20Tomaszowie%20Lubelskim%20z%20dnia%202%20lutego%202016%20roku%20(sygn.%20akt%20II%20K%20662/14,%20niepubl.)&rft.jtitle=Santander%20Art%20&%20Culture%20Law%20Review&rft.au=Olech,%20Agnieszka&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=97-106&rft.issn=2391-7997&rft.eissn=2450-050X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.005.9766&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E789999%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519967313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=789999&rfr_iscdi=true |