Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji
The reflections of positivism, the basic output in the scientific field of instrumental reasoning, are not confined to quantitative data production, but also influence the strengthening and establishment of the mainstream worldview in which patriarchy is included. It seems necessary for feminist the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Folklor/edebiyat 2018, Vol.24 (96), p.201-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; tur |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 96 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Folklor/edebiyat |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Yıldırım, Pınar Tansel İlic, Deniz |
description | The reflections of positivism, the basic output in the scientific field of instrumental
reasoning, are not confined to quantitative data production, but also influence the
strengthening and establishment of the mainstream worldview in which patriarchy is included. It seems necessary for feminist theory and methodology, which transforms patriarchalism, to spread the voices of women both in the production of texts as scientists, and in the representations of women in the texts produced, to establish a certain distance from positivism. This study attempts to discuss the feminist methodology's ability to distance itself from traditional research methods. It is unlikely to discuss positivism and instrumental intellectual concepts in general, as feminism has different subtitles such as liberal, radical, Marxist, cultural, existentialist and postmodern. This text firstly deals with the distinctions between different feminist theories and methodologies, then attempts to address to the theses of Dorothy Smith and Sandra Harding about instrumental research methodology, positivism, and woman's position as research object and subject. |
doi_str_mv | 10.22559/folklor.306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_779599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>779599</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>779599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586-7a19f47d08193da08069f74d9ce99ef46e95baece8d984fd7f9610c2fdfbb5e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFOAjEYhBujiQS5efTQB3Cx3d1u9z8iihoxeuDelO3fpFCoaZFEXsDH8OiZZwDfy41ycC4zh8lk8hFyzlk_z4WAKxv83IfYL1h1RDq8YCyTJfDjf_mU9FKasVZCQi2gQ24GUe--kvZ0MPearpG-hI1bubXbLJA-6vj9ud_S3cd-O9dLeu0iHeHCLV1a0SdcBRN8mLkzcmK1T9g7eJdMRreT4X02fr57GA7GWSPqKpOagy2lYTWHwmhWswqsLA00CIC2rBDEVGODtYG6tEZaqDhrcmvsdCqQFV1y-TfbxJBSRKteo1vo-K44U78M1IGBahm09YtDHTF4NQtvcdm-U1KCACh-AOdTXf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yıldırım, Pınar ; Tansel İlic, Deniz</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Pınar ; Tansel İlic, Deniz</creatorcontrib><description>The reflections of positivism, the basic output in the scientific field of instrumental
reasoning, are not confined to quantitative data production, but also influence the
strengthening and establishment of the mainstream worldview in which patriarchy is included. It seems necessary for feminist theory and methodology, which transforms patriarchalism, to spread the voices of women both in the production of texts as scientists, and in the representations of women in the texts produced, to establish a certain distance from positivism. This study attempts to discuss the feminist methodology's ability to distance itself from traditional research methods. It is unlikely to discuss positivism and instrumental intellectual concepts in general, as feminism has different subtitles such as liberal, radical, Marxist, cultural, existentialist and postmodern. This text firstly deals with the distinctions between different feminist theories and methodologies, then attempts to address to the theses of Dorothy Smith and Sandra Harding about instrumental research methodology, positivism, and woman's position as research object and subject.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1300-7491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22559/folklor.306</identifier><language>eng ; tur</language><publisher>Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi</publisher><subject>Evaluation research ; Gender Studies ; Methodology and research technology</subject><ispartof>Folklor/edebiyat, 2018, Vol.24 (96), p.201-210</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_48274.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansel İlic, Deniz</creatorcontrib><title>Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji</title><title>Folklor/edebiyat</title><addtitle>Folklore/Literature</addtitle><description>The reflections of positivism, the basic output in the scientific field of instrumental
reasoning, are not confined to quantitative data production, but also influence the
strengthening and establishment of the mainstream worldview in which patriarchy is included. It seems necessary for feminist theory and methodology, which transforms patriarchalism, to spread the voices of women both in the production of texts as scientists, and in the representations of women in the texts produced, to establish a certain distance from positivism. This study attempts to discuss the feminist methodology's ability to distance itself from traditional research methods. It is unlikely to discuss positivism and instrumental intellectual concepts in general, as feminism has different subtitles such as liberal, radical, Marxist, cultural, existentialist and postmodern. This text firstly deals with the distinctions between different feminist theories and methodologies, then attempts to address to the theses of Dorothy Smith and Sandra Harding about instrumental research methodology, positivism, and woman's position as research object and subject.</description><subject>Evaluation research</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Methodology and research technology</subject><issn>1300-7491</issn><issn>1300-7491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFOAjEYhBujiQS5efTQB3Cx3d1u9z8iihoxeuDelO3fpFCoaZFEXsDH8OiZZwDfy41ycC4zh8lk8hFyzlk_z4WAKxv83IfYL1h1RDq8YCyTJfDjf_mU9FKasVZCQi2gQ24GUe--kvZ0MPearpG-hI1bubXbLJA-6vj9ud_S3cd-O9dLeu0iHeHCLV1a0SdcBRN8mLkzcmK1T9g7eJdMRreT4X02fr57GA7GWSPqKpOagy2lYTWHwmhWswqsLA00CIC2rBDEVGODtYG6tEZaqDhrcmvsdCqQFV1y-TfbxJBSRKteo1vo-K44U78M1IGBahm09YtDHTF4NQtvcdm-U1KCACh-AOdTXf0</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Yıldırım, Pınar</creator><creator>Tansel İlic, Deniz</creator><general>Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi</general><general>Cyprus International University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji</title><author>Yıldırım, Pınar ; Tansel İlic, Deniz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586-7a19f47d08193da08069f74d9ce99ef46e95baece8d984fd7f9610c2fdfbb5e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; tur</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Evaluation research</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Methodology and research technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansel İlic, Deniz</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Folklor/edebiyat</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldırım, Pınar</au><au>Tansel İlic, Deniz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji</atitle><jtitle>Folklor/edebiyat</jtitle><addtitle>Folklore/Literature</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>96</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>201-210</pages><issn>1300-7491</issn><eissn>1300-7491</eissn><abstract>The reflections of positivism, the basic output in the scientific field of instrumental
reasoning, are not confined to quantitative data production, but also influence the
strengthening and establishment of the mainstream worldview in which patriarchy is included. It seems necessary for feminist theory and methodology, which transforms patriarchalism, to spread the voices of women both in the production of texts as scientists, and in the representations of women in the texts produced, to establish a certain distance from positivism. This study attempts to discuss the feminist methodology's ability to distance itself from traditional research methods. It is unlikely to discuss positivism and instrumental intellectual concepts in general, as feminism has different subtitles such as liberal, radical, Marxist, cultural, existentialist and postmodern. This text firstly deals with the distinctions between different feminist theories and methodologies, then attempts to address to the theses of Dorothy Smith and Sandra Harding about instrumental research methodology, positivism, and woman's position as research object and subject.</abstract><pub>Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi</pub><doi>10.22559/folklor.306</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1300-7491 |
ispartof | Folklor/edebiyat, 2018, Vol.24 (96), p.201-210 |
issn | 1300-7491 1300-7491 |
language | eng ; tur |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_779599 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Evaluation research Gender Studies Methodology and research technology |
title | Araçsal Akla ve Pozitivizme Karşı Çıkan Bir Feminist Metodoloji |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ara%C3%A7sal%20Akla%20ve%20Pozitivizme%20Kar%C5%9F%C4%B1%20%C3%87%C4%B1kan%20Bir%20Feminist%20Metodoloji&rft.jtitle=Folklor/edebiyat&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1r%C4%B1m,%20P%C4%B1nar&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=96&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=201-210&rft.issn=1300-7491&rft.eissn=1300-7491&rft_id=info:doi/10.22559/folklor.306&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E779599%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=779599&rfr_iscdi=true |