Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme

In the history of İslāmic thought, Māturīdī is a famous scholar both in the field of kalām and tafsir. Being approved by Māturīdī, the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl, which makes possible to take the comments made about the verses into systematic framework, is quite important. There is an importan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi 2019-06, Vol.23 (1), p.213-232
1. Verfasser: Büyük, Enes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; tur
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 1
container_start_page 213
container_title Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi
container_volume 23
creator Büyük, Enes
description In the history of İslāmic thought, Māturīdī is a famous scholar both in the field of kalām and tafsir. Being approved by Māturīdī, the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl, which makes possible to take the comments made about the verses into systematic framework, is quite important. There is an important information both about content of the distinction approved by Māturīdī and the main reasons that necessiated this distinction in the introduction of Samarqandī’s Sharh at Ta’wīlāt. From this information, it is understood that the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl had dated back to older time than Māturīdī and previous scholars dealed with the problem that necessiated this distinction and Māturīdī inherited this distinction from his predecessors. Information in the Sharh at Ta’wīlāt reveals that according to Māturīdī the companions had made interpretation (ta’wīl) in addition to tafsir and the explanations made by certain evidences is tafsir too. Therefore this information gives us the opportunity flexing the acceptance of the idea “tafsir, is dedicated to the companions, ta'wīl is dedicated to fuqaha (jurists)” and asserting that companions and scholars made both tafsir and ta’wīl. In this paper, we will research whether the distinction tafsir and ta’wīl regarded by Māturīdī completely belonged to his or not and content of the distinction and its reasons. We will also analyze this distinction according to examples in the Ta’wîlāt.
doi_str_mv 10.18505/cuid.520370
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_775602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>775602</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>775602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-2956fae59d1ef2e37b36c7e2f5efc7197b7497bd5ab1943c9cf577762383d8433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtKw0AUHUTBUrtz6WI-wNR5ZDLJstYnVHRRwV1IJndgbJrIpCm0K39DEAQ_oNi9u-RL_BKntri551zuOYfLQeiYkj4NBRFnqjZZXzDCJdlDHSZY6EWhfNr_5wE9RL2qMinxfcl5FIQdVN41n7Pm2zarrFn9vL4VpsBj0JWx3hjcPm9WOR4sbLuetms8B3xeF_VGsrs5t2OzZGLwg01mZoIvoP0Aa3DzvnRQOIexuP0qFOQwhSN0oJO8gt4Ou-jx6nI8vPFG99e3w8HIU5RQ4rFIBDoBEWUUNAMuUx4oCUwL0ErSSKbSdyMTSUojn6tIaSGlDBgPeRb6nHfR6TZX2bKqLOj4xZppYhcxJfFfX_Gmr3jbl5Of7OQAZR4_l7Ut3HuxlCIgjP8CT9J0lQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Büyük, Enes</creator><creatorcontrib>Büyük, Enes</creatorcontrib><description>In the history of İslāmic thought, Māturīdī is a famous scholar both in the field of kalām and tafsir. Being approved by Māturīdī, the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl, which makes possible to take the comments made about the verses into systematic framework, is quite important. There is an important information both about content of the distinction approved by Māturīdī and the main reasons that necessiated this distinction in the introduction of Samarqandī’s Sharh at Ta’wīlāt. From this information, it is understood that the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl had dated back to older time than Māturīdī and previous scholars dealed with the problem that necessiated this distinction and Māturīdī inherited this distinction from his predecessors. Information in the Sharh at Ta’wīlāt reveals that according to Māturīdī the companions had made interpretation (ta’wīl) in addition to tafsir and the explanations made by certain evidences is tafsir too. Therefore this information gives us the opportunity flexing the acceptance of the idea “tafsir, is dedicated to the companions, ta'wīl is dedicated to fuqaha (jurists)” and asserting that companions and scholars made both tafsir and ta’wīl. In this paper, we will research whether the distinction tafsir and ta’wīl regarded by Māturīdī completely belonged to his or not and content of the distinction and its reasons. We will also analyze this distinction according to examples in the Ta’wîlāt.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2528-9861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2528-987X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18505/cuid.520370</identifier><language>eng ; tur</language><publisher>Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahyat Fakültesi</publisher><subject>Islam studies ; Sociology of Religion</subject><ispartof>Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi, 2019-06, Vol.23 (1), p.213-232</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-2956fae59d1ef2e37b36c7e2f5efc7197b7497bd5ab1943c9cf577762383d8433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-2956fae59d1ef2e37b36c7e2f5efc7197b7497bd5ab1943c9cf577762383d8433</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9619-9450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2019_48007.jpeg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Büyük, Enes</creatorcontrib><title>Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><title>Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi</title><addtitle>Cumhuriyet Theology Journal</addtitle><description>In the history of İslāmic thought, Māturīdī is a famous scholar both in the field of kalām and tafsir. Being approved by Māturīdī, the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl, which makes possible to take the comments made about the verses into systematic framework, is quite important. There is an important information both about content of the distinction approved by Māturīdī and the main reasons that necessiated this distinction in the introduction of Samarqandī’s Sharh at Ta’wīlāt. From this information, it is understood that the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl had dated back to older time than Māturīdī and previous scholars dealed with the problem that necessiated this distinction and Māturīdī inherited this distinction from his predecessors. Information in the Sharh at Ta’wīlāt reveals that according to Māturīdī the companions had made interpretation (ta’wīl) in addition to tafsir and the explanations made by certain evidences is tafsir too. Therefore this information gives us the opportunity flexing the acceptance of the idea “tafsir, is dedicated to the companions, ta'wīl is dedicated to fuqaha (jurists)” and asserting that companions and scholars made both tafsir and ta’wīl. In this paper, we will research whether the distinction tafsir and ta’wīl regarded by Māturīdī completely belonged to his or not and content of the distinction and its reasons. We will also analyze this distinction according to examples in the Ta’wîlāt.</description><subject>Islam studies</subject><subject>Sociology of Religion</subject><issn>2528-9861</issn><issn>2528-987X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtKw0AUHUTBUrtz6WI-wNR5ZDLJstYnVHRRwV1IJndgbJrIpCm0K39DEAQ_oNi9u-RL_BKntri551zuOYfLQeiYkj4NBRFnqjZZXzDCJdlDHSZY6EWhfNr_5wE9RL2qMinxfcl5FIQdVN41n7Pm2zarrFn9vL4VpsBj0JWx3hjcPm9WOR4sbLuetms8B3xeF_VGsrs5t2OzZGLwg01mZoIvoP0Aa3DzvnRQOIexuP0qFOQwhSN0oJO8gt4Ou-jx6nI8vPFG99e3w8HIU5RQ4rFIBDoBEWUUNAMuUx4oCUwL0ErSSKbSdyMTSUojn6tIaSGlDBgPeRb6nHfR6TZX2bKqLOj4xZppYhcxJfFfX_Gmr3jbl5Of7OQAZR4_l7Ut3HuxlCIgjP8CT9J0lQ</recordid><startdate>20190615</startdate><enddate>20190615</enddate><creator>Büyük, Enes</creator><general>Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahyat Fakültesi</general><general>Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Theology</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-9450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190615</creationdate><title>Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><author>Büyük, Enes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1010-2956fae59d1ef2e37b36c7e2f5efc7197b7497bd5ab1943c9cf577762383d8433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; tur</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Islam studies</topic><topic>Sociology of Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Büyük, Enes</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Büyük, Enes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</atitle><jtitle>Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi</jtitle><addtitle>Cumhuriyet Theology Journal</addtitle><date>2019-06-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>213-232</pages><issn>2528-9861</issn><eissn>2528-987X</eissn><abstract>In the history of İslāmic thought, Māturīdī is a famous scholar both in the field of kalām and tafsir. Being approved by Māturīdī, the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl, which makes possible to take the comments made about the verses into systematic framework, is quite important. There is an important information both about content of the distinction approved by Māturīdī and the main reasons that necessiated this distinction in the introduction of Samarqandī’s Sharh at Ta’wīlāt. From this information, it is understood that the distinction of tafsir and ta’wīl had dated back to older time than Māturīdī and previous scholars dealed with the problem that necessiated this distinction and Māturīdī inherited this distinction from his predecessors. Information in the Sharh at Ta’wīlāt reveals that according to Māturīdī the companions had made interpretation (ta’wīl) in addition to tafsir and the explanations made by certain evidences is tafsir too. Therefore this information gives us the opportunity flexing the acceptance of the idea “tafsir, is dedicated to the companions, ta'wīl is dedicated to fuqaha (jurists)” and asserting that companions and scholars made both tafsir and ta’wīl. In this paper, we will research whether the distinction tafsir and ta’wīl regarded by Māturīdī completely belonged to his or not and content of the distinction and its reasons. We will also analyze this distinction according to examples in the Ta’wîlāt.</abstract><pub>Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahyat Fakültesi</pub><doi>10.18505/cuid.520370</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-9450</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2528-9861
ispartof Cumhuriyet ilahiyat dergisi, 2019-06, Vol.23 (1), p.213-232
issn 2528-9861
2528-987X
language eng ; tur
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_775602
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Islam studies
Sociology of Religion
title Mâtürîdî’nin Tefsir-Te’vîl Ayrımı ve Bunun Te’vîlât’taki Pratik Değeri Üzerine Bir İnceleme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=M%C3%A2t%C3%BCr%C3%AEd%C3%AE%E2%80%99nin%20Tefsir-Te%E2%80%99v%C3%AEl%20Ayr%C4%B1m%C4%B1%20ve%20Bunun%20Te%E2%80%99v%C3%AEl%C3%A2t%E2%80%99taki%20Pratik%20De%C4%9Feri%20%C3%9Czerine%20Bir%20%C4%B0nceleme&rft.jtitle=Cumhuriyet%20ilahiyat%20dergisi&rft.au=B%C3%BCy%C3%BCk,%20Enes&rft.date=2019-06-15&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=213-232&rft.issn=2528-9861&rft.eissn=2528-987X&rft_id=info:doi/10.18505/cuid.520370&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E775602%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=775602&rfr_iscdi=true