Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању

In this paper I want to compare rare theoretical justifications of border walls with discourses on boundaries and walls by Central and Eastern European political actors in dealing with refugee crisis in 2015. I analize three such discourses: consequentialist, discourse of reponsibility for fair dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Glasnik Etnografskog instituta 2017, Vol.LXV (3), p.427-541
1. Verfasser: Đorđević, Biljana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:srp
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 541
container_issue 3
container_start_page 427
container_title Glasnik Etnografskog instituta
container_volume LXV
creator Đorđević, Biljana
description In this paper I want to compare rare theoretical justifications of border walls with discourses on boundaries and walls by Central and Eastern European political actors in dealing with refugee crisis in 2015. I analize three such discourses: consequentialist, discourse of reponsibility for fair distribution of cosmopolitan duties, and nationalistic discourse. This comparison allows me to question аplicability of Wendy Brown’s argument that the states with waning sovereignty display symbols of force in building border walls aimed at defending fragile egos built around national and religious identities. Finally, I want to elucidate what type of political subjectivity is produced and legitimated by these acts of fortification within and around CEE “walled” states.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_746122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>746122</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>746122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_7461223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFTk1Kw0AUHkTBoL2Bi7lAIMm0aepWFA_gvojERSktGNy3CagXEKruXY_VwdCk9grfu5Hf2O4dePO-n3nfmz0VJMZ0wyzpDfZVEJleFEZZGh-qTlGMIh4zSOOsH6gWb6jlCQ5r1BpfJHOspJIZu9Vo6HxSLFGjhZUH4gXcqcY3LKvmiOWs84JDKy8evvs8KWVGr9m6z1iS_mDjCTdtiJttsDxiRUnmUuHDp_MDft_yz3Yea6k0cyzflLwXrFepjtXB7fW4yDu7fqROLs6vzi7Dmzyfjoej6f3dhPqw303jJDH_2L-baqGv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Đorđević, Biljana</creator><creatorcontrib>Đorđević, Biljana</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper I want to compare rare theoretical justifications of border walls with discourses on boundaries and walls by Central and Eastern European political actors in dealing with refugee crisis in 2015. I analize three such discourses: consequentialist, discourse of reponsibility for fair distribution of cosmopolitan duties, and nationalistic discourse. This comparison allows me to question аplicability of Wendy Brown’s argument that the states with waning sovereignty display symbols of force in building border walls aimed at defending fragile egos built around national and religious identities. Finally, I want to elucidate what type of political subjectivity is produced and legitimated by these acts of fortification within and around CEE “walled” states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0350-0861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-8259</identifier><language>srp</language><publisher>Етнографски институт САНУ</publisher><subject>Identity of Collectives ; Migration Studies ; Political Theory ; Present Times (2010 - today)</subject><ispartof>Glasnik Etnografskog instituta, 2017, Vol.LXV (3), p.427-541</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2017_45756.PNG</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Đorđević, Biljana</creatorcontrib><title>Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању</title><title>Glasnik Etnografskog instituta</title><addtitle>Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SANU</addtitle><description>In this paper I want to compare rare theoretical justifications of border walls with discourses on boundaries and walls by Central and Eastern European political actors in dealing with refugee crisis in 2015. I analize three such discourses: consequentialist, discourse of reponsibility for fair distribution of cosmopolitan duties, and nationalistic discourse. This comparison allows me to question аplicability of Wendy Brown’s argument that the states with waning sovereignty display symbols of force in building border walls aimed at defending fragile egos built around national and religious identities. Finally, I want to elucidate what type of political subjectivity is produced and legitimated by these acts of fortification within and around CEE “walled” states.</description><subject>Identity of Collectives</subject><subject>Migration Studies</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Present Times (2010 - today)</subject><issn>0350-0861</issn><issn>2334-8259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFTk1Kw0AUHkTBoL2Bi7lAIMm0aepWFA_gvojERSktGNy3CagXEKruXY_VwdCk9grfu5Hf2O4dePO-n3nfmz0VJMZ0wyzpDfZVEJleFEZZGh-qTlGMIh4zSOOsH6gWb6jlCQ5r1BpfJHOspJIZu9Vo6HxSLFGjhZUH4gXcqcY3LKvmiOWs84JDKy8evvs8KWVGr9m6z1iS_mDjCTdtiJttsDxiRUnmUuHDp_MDft_yz3Yea6k0cyzflLwXrFepjtXB7fW4yDu7fqROLs6vzi7Dmzyfjoej6f3dhPqw303jJDH_2L-baqGv</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Đorđević, Biljana</creator><general>Етнографски институт САНУ</general><general>Institute of Ethnography SANU</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању</title><author>Đorđević, Biljana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_7461223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>srp</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Identity of Collectives</topic><topic>Migration Studies</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Present Times (2010 - today)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Đorđević, Biljana</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Glasnik Etnografskog instituta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Đorđević, Biljana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању</atitle><jtitle>Glasnik Etnografskog instituta</jtitle><addtitle>Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SANU</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>LXV</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>427-541</pages><issn>0350-0861</issn><eissn>2334-8259</eissn><abstract>In this paper I want to compare rare theoretical justifications of border walls with discourses on boundaries and walls by Central and Eastern European political actors in dealing with refugee crisis in 2015. I analize three such discourses: consequentialist, discourse of reponsibility for fair distribution of cosmopolitan duties, and nationalistic discourse. This comparison allows me to question аplicability of Wendy Brown’s argument that the states with waning sovereignty display symbols of force in building border walls aimed at defending fragile egos built around national and religious identities. Finally, I want to elucidate what type of political subjectivity is produced and legitimated by these acts of fortification within and around CEE “walled” states.</abstract><pub>Етнографски институт САНУ</pub><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0350-0861
ispartof Glasnik Etnografskog instituta, 2017, Vol.LXV (3), p.427-541
issn 0350-0861
2334-8259
language srp
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_746122
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Identity of Collectives
Migration Studies
Political Theory
Present Times (2010 - today)
title Лишени дискурса легитимације: зазидане земље Централне Европе и политички субјективитети у настајању
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9B%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%20%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B0%20%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5:%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%20%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%99%D0%B5%20%D0%A6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B5%20%D0%95%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8%20%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B1%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%20%D1%83%20%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%B0%D1%9A%D1%83&rft.jtitle=Glasnik%20Etnografskog%20instituta&rft.au=%C4%90or%C4%91evi%C4%87,%20Biljana&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=LXV&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=427-541&rft.issn=0350-0861&rft.eissn=2334-8259&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E746122%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=746122&rfr_iscdi=true