Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa
After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Collectanea philologica 2018, Vol.XXI (1), p.75-86 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | pol |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 86 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 75 |
| container_title | Collectanea philologica |
| container_volume | XXI |
| creator | Marchewka, Anna |
| description | After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624). |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_743444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>743444</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>743444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_7434443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY11jWwNDBkYeA0NDcGso0NLTkYeIuLM5MMTA3MjQ2AKjgZlLyLE_NKKgsSFR41TFZIyU8qSlQ4uic_L1EhOD-7KLEktTiRh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzyLi5hjh76CanpubnxGfllxblAcXjzU2MTUxMjAlIAwCEWCyK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1733-0319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2353-0901</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</publisher><subject>Greek Literature ; Theory of Literature</subject><ispartof>Collectanea philologica, 2018, Vol.XXI (1), p.75-86</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_45567.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa</title><title>Collectanea philologica</title><addtitle>Collectanea Philologica</addtitle><description>After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624).</description><subject>Greek Literature</subject><subject>Theory of Literature</subject><issn>1733-0319</issn><issn>2353-0901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY11jWwNDBkYeA0NDcGso0NLTkYeIuLM5MMTA3MjQ2AKjgZlLyLE_NKKgsSFR41TFZIyU8qSlQ4uic_L1EhOD-7KLEktTiRh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzyLi5hjh76CanpubnxGfllxblAcXjzU2MTUxMjAlIAwCEWCyK</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</general><general>Lodz University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa</title><author>Marchewka, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_7434443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Greek Literature</topic><topic>Theory of Literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Collectanea philologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchewka, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa</atitle><jtitle>Collectanea philologica</jtitle><addtitle>Collectanea Philologica</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>XXI</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>75-86</pages><issn>1733-0319</issn><eissn>2353-0901</eissn><abstract>After the death of Socrates, anecdotes and distorted stories about the philosopher’s family life and the unbearable character of his wife, Xanthippe, circulated in the general quasi literary circle. These stories were willingly read in subsequent epochs. Eventually, they preserved the model of the hellcat wife in the shape of Xanthippe, to which we still eagerly refer to. But did Socrates’ wife really deserve such a bad opinion? Is it possible for such a rating to be given by the desultory information we owe to Plato (Phaed. 60a) and Xenophon (Mem. II 2, Conv. II 10)? When attempting to defend the Xanthippe, an important source turned out to be a letter from Pseudo-Xenophon (vel Pseudo-Aeschines), which allowed us to look at the philosopher’s wife as his pupil, leading life according to Socrates’ teachings and surrounded by the care of his friends (Epist. XXI, Hercher 1873: 624).</abstract><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1733-0319 |
| ispartof | Collectanea philologica, 2018, Vol.XXI (1), p.75-86 |
| issn | 1733-0319 2353-0901 |
| language | pol |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_743444 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Greek Literature Theory of Literature |
| title | Ksantypa – dobra żona Sokratesa |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ksantypa%20%E2%80%93%20dobra%20%C5%BCona%20Sokratesa&rft.jtitle=Collectanea%20philologica&rft.au=Marchewka,%20Anna&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=XXI&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=75-86&rft.issn=1733-0319&rft.eissn=2353-0901&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E743444%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=743444&rfr_iscdi=true |