Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography

There are several reasons why essayist Richard Rodriguez could be classified as a „minority‟ writer; namely, his Mexican-American roots, his Catholic faith, and his self- declared homosexuality. However, readers who expect his writings to display the kind of attitudes and features that are common in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American, British, and Canadian studies British, and Canadian studies, 2017 (29), p.46-64
1. Verfasser: IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 29
container_start_page 46
container_title American, British, and Canadian studies
container_volume
creator IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR
description There are several reasons why essayist Richard Rodriguez could be classified as a „minority‟ writer; namely, his Mexican-American roots, his Catholic faith, and his self- declared homosexuality. However, readers who expect his writings to display the kind of attitudes and features that are common in works by other „minority‟ authors are bound to be disappointed. The meditations that Rodriguez offers are far from clearly dividing the world between oppressors and oppressed or dominant and subaltern. As he sees it, ethnic, religious, class or sexual categories and divisions present further complications than those immediately apparent to the eye. Does this mean that Rodriguez fails to resist and challenge the dynamics he observes between different social groups? Or that his observations are complaisant rather than subversive? Not necessarily, since his essays are always a tribute to the possibilities of disagreement and defiance. My analysis of his latest collection of essays, Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography (2013), maps out and dissects the writing strategies that Rodriguez employs to generate dialogical forms of inquiry and resistance regarding such up-to-date topics as religious clashes (and commonalities), Gay rights (in relation to other Human Rights) or how public spaces are being re-imagined in this global, digital era.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_709594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>709594</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>709594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_7095943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFTksKwjAUDKJg0d7AxbuA0GA_1l3xg2sVdFeebWyfhESSVKgrr-H1PIkV3Dub-S6mxzw-D_k0jcNT_6d5OE-GzLf2GnSIYp4E3GOUSSeMQkd3AUdsLegLLGuUUqiKVAWoStgJS9Z9HSnYUVGj6UJdGqoa8Xg_XxZWaGQ3WEAG-xsZcg1KyBqnz6Qrg7e6HbPBBaUV_o9HbLJZH5bbaSGElvlVN90NafMkSKM0nP2pP8WCRoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</creator><creatorcontrib>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</creatorcontrib><description>There are several reasons why essayist Richard Rodriguez could be classified as a „minority‟ writer; namely, his Mexican-American roots, his Catholic faith, and his self- declared homosexuality. However, readers who expect his writings to display the kind of attitudes and features that are common in works by other „minority‟ authors are bound to be disappointed. The meditations that Rodriguez offers are far from clearly dividing the world between oppressors and oppressed or dominant and subaltern. As he sees it, ethnic, religious, class or sexual categories and divisions present further complications than those immediately apparent to the eye. Does this mean that Rodriguez fails to resist and challenge the dynamics he observes between different social groups? Or that his observations are complaisant rather than subversive? Not necessarily, since his essays are always a tribute to the possibilities of disagreement and defiance. My analysis of his latest collection of essays, Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography (2013), maps out and dissects the writing strategies that Rodriguez employs to generate dialogical forms of inquiry and resistance regarding such up-to-date topics as religious clashes (and commonalities), Gay rights (in relation to other Human Rights) or how public spaces are being re-imagined in this global, digital era.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1841-1487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1841-964X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LUCIAN BLAGA University Press of Sibiu</publisher><subject>Gender Studies ; Novel ; Studies of Literature</subject><ispartof>American, British, and Canadian studies, 2017 (29), p.46-64</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2017_43204.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,21342</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography</title><title>American, British, and Canadian studies</title><addtitle>American, British and Canadian Studies</addtitle><description>There are several reasons why essayist Richard Rodriguez could be classified as a „minority‟ writer; namely, his Mexican-American roots, his Catholic faith, and his self- declared homosexuality. However, readers who expect his writings to display the kind of attitudes and features that are common in works by other „minority‟ authors are bound to be disappointed. The meditations that Rodriguez offers are far from clearly dividing the world between oppressors and oppressed or dominant and subaltern. As he sees it, ethnic, religious, class or sexual categories and divisions present further complications than those immediately apparent to the eye. Does this mean that Rodriguez fails to resist and challenge the dynamics he observes between different social groups? Or that his observations are complaisant rather than subversive? Not necessarily, since his essays are always a tribute to the possibilities of disagreement and defiance. My analysis of his latest collection of essays, Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography (2013), maps out and dissects the writing strategies that Rodriguez employs to generate dialogical forms of inquiry and resistance regarding such up-to-date topics as religious clashes (and commonalities), Gay rights (in relation to other Human Rights) or how public spaces are being re-imagined in this global, digital era.</description><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Novel</subject><subject>Studies of Literature</subject><issn>1841-1487</issn><issn>1841-964X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFTksKwjAUDKJg0d7AxbuA0GA_1l3xg2sVdFeebWyfhESSVKgrr-H1PIkV3Dub-S6mxzw-D_k0jcNT_6d5OE-GzLf2GnSIYp4E3GOUSSeMQkd3AUdsLegLLGuUUqiKVAWoStgJS9Z9HSnYUVGj6UJdGqoa8Xg_XxZWaGQ3WEAG-xsZcg1KyBqnz6Qrg7e6HbPBBaUV_o9HbLJZH5bbaSGElvlVN90NafMkSKM0nP2pP8WCRoM</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</creator><general>LUCIAN BLAGA University Press of Sibiu</general><general>Editura Universitatii LUCIAN BLAGA din Sibiu</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography</title><author>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_7095943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Novel</topic><topic>Studies of Literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>American, British, and Canadian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ, AITOR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography</atitle><jtitle>American, British, and Canadian studies</jtitle><addtitle>American, British and Canadian Studies</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issue>29</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>46-64</pages><issn>1841-1487</issn><eissn>1841-964X</eissn><abstract>There are several reasons why essayist Richard Rodriguez could be classified as a „minority‟ writer; namely, his Mexican-American roots, his Catholic faith, and his self- declared homosexuality. However, readers who expect his writings to display the kind of attitudes and features that are common in works by other „minority‟ authors are bound to be disappointed. The meditations that Rodriguez offers are far from clearly dividing the world between oppressors and oppressed or dominant and subaltern. As he sees it, ethnic, religious, class or sexual categories and divisions present further complications than those immediately apparent to the eye. Does this mean that Rodriguez fails to resist and challenge the dynamics he observes between different social groups? Or that his observations are complaisant rather than subversive? Not necessarily, since his essays are always a tribute to the possibilities of disagreement and defiance. My analysis of his latest collection of essays, Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography (2013), maps out and dissects the writing strategies that Rodriguez employs to generate dialogical forms of inquiry and resistance regarding such up-to-date topics as religious clashes (and commonalities), Gay rights (in relation to other Human Rights) or how public spaces are being re-imagined in this global, digital era.</abstract><pub>LUCIAN BLAGA University Press of Sibiu</pub><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1841-1487
ispartof American, British, and Canadian studies, 2017 (29), p.46-64
issn 1841-1487
1841-964X
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_709594
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals; Central and Eastern European Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Gender Studies
Novel
Studies of Literature
title Alternative Ways of Challenging and Resisting in Richard Rodriguez’s Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A23%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20Ways%20of%20Challenging%20and%20Resisting%20in%20Richard%20Rodriguez%E2%80%99s%20Darling:%20A%20Spiritual%20Autobiography&rft.jtitle=American,%20British,%20and%20Canadian%20studies&rft.au=IBARROLA-ARMENDARIZ,%20AITOR&rft.date=2017&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=46-64&rft.issn=1841-1487&rft.eissn=1841-964X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E709594%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=709594&rfr_iscdi=true