Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века

The article advances a new approach to the political competition of the Rurik dynasty for the influence on Volhynia and Galicia in the 11 th century. The research is based on the “mixed sources” logic and deals with the reconstruction of social and political structures through the archaeological evi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stratum 2018, Vol.5 (5), p.183-206
1. Verfasser: Musin, Aleksandr E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:rus
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue 5
container_start_page 183
container_title Stratum
container_volume 5
creator Musin, Aleksandr E
description The article advances a new approach to the political competition of the Rurik dynasty for the influence on Volhynia and Galicia in the 11 th century. The research is based on the “mixed sources” logic and deals with the reconstruction of social and political structures through the archaeological evidences, imagology of power, and historical geography. The re-appraisal of the information of the Primary Rus’ Chronicle is also proposed. The decisions on the hereditary possession adopted by Liubech Congress in 1097 AD dealt only with the Rus’ Land in the Middle Dnieper area that played the role of colonial metropolis to other territories. Other princes fought for the rights to control administrative centers on the main commercial routes that gave them the right to be members of the “union of archontes”– the political structure imposed on Eastern Europe by Byzantine Empire in the treaties of the 10 th century — and to “have a part” (prichastie) in political life of the Rus’ Land. This status reflected the idea of local élites about the social prestige and structured the model of power linked to the Byzantine hierarchy. Only later this structure took the form of clannish sovereignty of the Rus’ Land. This system of power cannot be compared to the European corpus fratrum. The analysis of written sources testifies to the existence of the archaic system of political power in the 11 th century Rus’, with domination of values inherited from the previous period. Its economy continued to be based on the control over transcontinental trade.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_707892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>707892</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>707892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551-5576d63266298989c0473725573375a7f49e8bbce1d36b9490762d1ee23fc7da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs9Kw0AQxoMoWGrfwMNePQR2s9lscpJS1BYKXnrwFtIkxZbWltQK3lpBe1MQBN_BS6gGY_9E6BPMgg_kpC3D7ux8_L5vdk8rMFtInQvO9_FtUVt3qJCHWmk47FBKGTOEKZyC9lfpR4PRkLQi7zYa9QiksICUrD_UBDL1DN8EYjVWj5DBSj3gPVsvTgm8q0k-qTHyc8j0HZQgsMDzCamaQoIZcwR-SM7AEivZpMQbXy4T1DL4Qn2hXmBJYIb-eBOe4kDgFZdsV01hhSia3mCG_gx-IdkGr9QTxOSqlrsTVOIj7aDldYdhadeLWuP8rFGp6vXLi1qlXNd9IZguhLQCixuWZTg2lk9NyaWBMudSeLJlOqHdbPohC7jVdEyHSssIWBgavOXLwONF7WQbe-113UHU7nnRvdv32m61XHdzjXImTSbtO4bs8Zb1w7DfdTv9UXSDX3MllbZj8H_VQ8am</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><creator>Musin, Aleksandr E</creator><creatorcontrib>Musin, Aleksandr E</creatorcontrib><description>The article advances a new approach to the political competition of the Rurik dynasty for the influence on Volhynia and Galicia in the 11 th century. The research is based on the “mixed sources” logic and deals with the reconstruction of social and political structures through the archaeological evidences, imagology of power, and historical geography. The re-appraisal of the information of the Primary Rus’ Chronicle is also proposed. The decisions on the hereditary possession adopted by Liubech Congress in 1097 AD dealt only with the Rus’ Land in the Middle Dnieper area that played the role of colonial metropolis to other territories. Other princes fought for the rights to control administrative centers on the main commercial routes that gave them the right to be members of the “union of archontes”– the political structure imposed on Eastern Europe by Byzantine Empire in the treaties of the 10 th century — and to “have a part” (prichastie) in political life of the Rus’ Land. This status reflected the idea of local élites about the social prestige and structured the model of power linked to the Byzantine hierarchy. Only later this structure took the form of clannish sovereignty of the Rus’ Land. This system of power cannot be compared to the European corpus fratrum. The analysis of written sources testifies to the existence of the archaic system of political power in the 11 th century Rus’, with domination of values inherited from the previous period. Its economy continued to be based on the control over transcontinental trade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1608-9057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1857-3533</identifier><language>rus</language><publisher>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</publisher><subject>6th to 12th Centuries ; Archaeology ; Archaeology and Prehistory ; Historical Geography ; History ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Middle Ages</subject><ispartof>Stratum, 2018, Vol.5 (5), p.183-206</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8862-236X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_43083.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,21362</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-03174178$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Musin, Aleksandr E</creatorcontrib><title>Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века</title><title>Stratum</title><addtitle>Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology</addtitle><description>The article advances a new approach to the political competition of the Rurik dynasty for the influence on Volhynia and Galicia in the 11 th century. The research is based on the “mixed sources” logic and deals with the reconstruction of social and political structures through the archaeological evidences, imagology of power, and historical geography. The re-appraisal of the information of the Primary Rus’ Chronicle is also proposed. The decisions on the hereditary possession adopted by Liubech Congress in 1097 AD dealt only with the Rus’ Land in the Middle Dnieper area that played the role of colonial metropolis to other territories. Other princes fought for the rights to control administrative centers on the main commercial routes that gave them the right to be members of the “union of archontes”– the political structure imposed on Eastern Europe by Byzantine Empire in the treaties of the 10 th century — and to “have a part” (prichastie) in political life of the Rus’ Land. This status reflected the idea of local élites about the social prestige and structured the model of power linked to the Byzantine hierarchy. Only later this structure took the form of clannish sovereignty of the Rus’ Land. This system of power cannot be compared to the European corpus fratrum. The analysis of written sources testifies to the existence of the archaic system of political power in the 11 th century Rus’, with domination of values inherited from the previous period. Its economy continued to be based on the control over transcontinental trade.</description><subject>6th to 12th Centuries</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Archaeology and Prehistory</subject><subject>Historical Geography</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Ages</subject><issn>1608-9057</issn><issn>1857-3533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNotjs9Kw0AQxoMoWGrfwMNePQR2s9lscpJS1BYKXnrwFtIkxZbWltQK3lpBe1MQBN_BS6gGY_9E6BPMgg_kpC3D7ux8_L5vdk8rMFtInQvO9_FtUVt3qJCHWmk47FBKGTOEKZyC9lfpR4PRkLQi7zYa9QiksICUrD_UBDL1DN8EYjVWj5DBSj3gPVsvTgm8q0k-qTHyc8j0HZQgsMDzCamaQoIZcwR-SM7AEivZpMQbXy4T1DL4Qn2hXmBJYIb-eBOe4kDgFZdsV01hhSia3mCG_gx-IdkGr9QTxOSqlrsTVOIj7aDldYdhadeLWuP8rFGp6vXLi1qlXNd9IZguhLQCixuWZTg2lk9NyaWBMudSeLJlOqHdbPohC7jVdEyHSssIWBgavOXLwONF7WQbe-113UHU7nnRvdv32m61XHdzjXImTSbtO4bs8Zb1w7DfdTv9UXSDX3MllbZj8H_VQ8am</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Musin, Aleksandr E</creator><general>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</general><general>Издательский дом Stratum, Университет «Высшая антропологическая школа</general><general>Haute École d'Anthropologie</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-236X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века</title><author>Musin, Aleksandr E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551-5576d63266298989c0473725573375a7f49e8bbce1d36b9490762d1ee23fc7da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>rus</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>6th to 12th Centuries</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Archaeology and Prehistory</topic><topic>Historical Geography</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Ages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Musin, Aleksandr E</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Musin, Aleksandr E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века</atitle><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle><addtitle>Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>183-206</pages><issn>1608-9057</issn><eissn>1857-3533</eissn><abstract>The article advances a new approach to the political competition of the Rurik dynasty for the influence on Volhynia and Galicia in the 11 th century. The research is based on the “mixed sources” logic and deals with the reconstruction of social and political structures through the archaeological evidences, imagology of power, and historical geography. The re-appraisal of the information of the Primary Rus’ Chronicle is also proposed. The decisions on the hereditary possession adopted by Liubech Congress in 1097 AD dealt only with the Rus’ Land in the Middle Dnieper area that played the role of colonial metropolis to other territories. Other princes fought for the rights to control administrative centers on the main commercial routes that gave them the right to be members of the “union of archontes”– the political structure imposed on Eastern Europe by Byzantine Empire in the treaties of the 10 th century — and to “have a part” (prichastie) in political life of the Rus’ Land. This status reflected the idea of local élites about the social prestige and structured the model of power linked to the Byzantine hierarchy. Only later this structure took the form of clannish sovereignty of the Rus’ Land. This system of power cannot be compared to the European corpus fratrum. The analysis of written sources testifies to the existence of the archaic system of political power in the 11 th century Rus’, with domination of values inherited from the previous period. Its economy continued to be based on the control over transcontinental trade.</abstract><pub>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</pub><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-236X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1608-9057
ispartof Stratum, 2018, Vol.5 (5), p.183-206
issn 1608-9057
1857-3533
language rus
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_707892
source Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals
subjects 6th to 12th Centuries
Archaeology
Archaeology and Prehistory
Historical Geography
History
Humanities and Social Sciences
Middle Ages
title Corpus fratrum или «союз архонтов»? Историко-археологический комментарий к моделям власти в Восточной Европе конца XI века
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corpus%20fratrum%20%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%20%C2%AB%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%8E%D0%B7%20%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%C2%BB?%20%D0%98%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE-%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%BA%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BC%20%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%20%D0%B2%20%D0%92%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%95%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B5%20%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B0%20XI%20%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0&rft.jtitle=Stratum&rft.au=Musin,%20Aleksandr%20E&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=183-206&rft.issn=1608-9057&rft.eissn=1857-3533&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_hal_p%3E707892%3C/ceeol_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=707892&rfr_iscdi=true