ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL
In this paper, I shall discuss the problem of evil and argue that our account of good and evil is at its core adeeply romantic narrative – it reflects our idealization of a perfect world. I will present the corearguments and responses from David Hume, Gottfried Leibniz, J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education Religion & Education, 2018-11, Vol.2 (2), p.176-181 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Yang, Steven Yue Heng |
description | In this paper, I shall discuss the problem of evil and argue that our account of good and evil is at its core adeeply romantic narrative – it reflects our idealization of a perfect world. I will present the corearguments and responses from David Hume, Gottfried Leibniz, J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantinga. Irecognize that there are two types of evil – moral and natural, and that the problem of evil exists in twoforms – logical and evidential. However, I shall limit my discussion to moral evil and focus on how thefree will defense is an attempted logical but not evidential solution to the problem of evil. I aim tostrengthen the free will defense with reference to William James’s religious hypothesis and argue that ouractive faith reconciles the notion of our free will with God’s divine attributes. Our active faith is a deeplypersonal commitment that transcends objective uncertainty. Our subjective, inward reflections elucidateour deepest meaning of life and our most passionate relation to God. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26520/mcdsare.2018.2.176-181 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_705077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>705077</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>705077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1181-463908de0429fa0e39de1952b329ba52db536923e870966898e8f05c9a7330c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j19LwzAUxYMoOOa-gWC_QOpN0vx7HGvqCrWFMZlvIW1TcGxWEnzw29vN-nQuB84954fQE4GUCk7h-dz10QWfUiAqpSmRAhNFbtCCCiBYZcBu_2-m3-_RKsYjADCipMroAuGmTvZbkxyaOje7pCmSqixMsq7zq13sjMmb14t_KKvqAd0N7hT9atYleivMfrPFVfNSbtYV7sjUjjPBNKjeQ0b14MAz3XuiOW0Z1a3jtG85E5oyryRoIZRWXg3AO-0kY9BJtkTy728XxhiDH-xX-Di78GMJ2Cu4ncHtBdxSO4HbqXpKPs5J78eTPY7f4XNaaiVwkJL9AqHhUGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I shall discuss the problem of evil and argue that our account of good and evil is at its core adeeply romantic narrative – it reflects our idealization of a perfect world. I will present the corearguments and responses from David Hume, Gottfried Leibniz, J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantinga. Irecognize that there are two types of evil – moral and natural, and that the problem of evil exists in twoforms – logical and evidential. However, I shall limit my discussion to moral evil and focus on how thefree will defense is an attempted logical but not evidential solution to the problem of evil. I aim tostrengthen the free will defense with reference to William James’s religious hypothesis and argue that ouractive faith reconciles the notion of our free will with God’s divine attributes. Our active faith is a deeplypersonal commitment that transcends objective uncertainty. Our subjective, inward reflections elucidateour deepest meaning of life and our most passionate relation to God.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2601-839X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2601-8403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2601-8403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2601-839X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26520/mcdsare.2018.2.176-181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ideas Forum International Academic and Scientific Association</publisher><subject>Philosophy</subject><ispartof>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education, 2018-11, Vol.2 (2), p.176-181</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2018_42859.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</creatorcontrib><title>ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL</title><title>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education</title><addtitle>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences Arts, Religion Education</addtitle><description>In this paper, I shall discuss the problem of evil and argue that our account of good and evil is at its core adeeply romantic narrative – it reflects our idealization of a perfect world. I will present the corearguments and responses from David Hume, Gottfried Leibniz, J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantinga. Irecognize that there are two types of evil – moral and natural, and that the problem of evil exists in twoforms – logical and evidential. However, I shall limit my discussion to moral evil and focus on how thefree will defense is an attempted logical but not evidential solution to the problem of evil. I aim tostrengthen the free will defense with reference to William James’s religious hypothesis and argue that ouractive faith reconciles the notion of our free will with God’s divine attributes. Our active faith is a deeplypersonal commitment that transcends objective uncertainty. Our subjective, inward reflections elucidateour deepest meaning of life and our most passionate relation to God.</description><subject>Philosophy</subject><issn>2601-839X</issn><issn>2601-8403</issn><issn>2601-8403</issn><issn>2601-839X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j19LwzAUxYMoOOa-gWC_QOpN0vx7HGvqCrWFMZlvIW1TcGxWEnzw29vN-nQuB84954fQE4GUCk7h-dz10QWfUiAqpSmRAhNFbtCCCiBYZcBu_2-m3-_RKsYjADCipMroAuGmTvZbkxyaOje7pCmSqixMsq7zq13sjMmb14t_KKvqAd0N7hT9atYleivMfrPFVfNSbtYV7sjUjjPBNKjeQ0b14MAz3XuiOW0Z1a3jtG85E5oyryRoIZRWXg3AO-0kY9BJtkTy728XxhiDH-xX-Di78GMJ2Cu4ncHtBdxSO4HbqXpKPs5J78eTPY7f4XNaaiVwkJL9AqHhUGI</recordid><startdate>20181115</startdate><enddate>20181115</enddate><creator>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</creator><general>Ideas Forum International Academic and Scientific Association</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181115</creationdate><title>ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL</title><author>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1181-463908de0429fa0e39de1952b329ba52db536923e870966898e8f05c9a7330c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Philosophy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Steven Yue Heng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL</atitle><jtitle>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education</jtitle><addtitle>International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences Arts, Religion Education</addtitle><date>2018-11-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>176-181</pages><issn>2601-839X</issn><issn>2601-8403</issn><eissn>2601-8403</eissn><eissn>2601-839X</eissn><abstract>In this paper, I shall discuss the problem of evil and argue that our account of good and evil is at its core adeeply romantic narrative – it reflects our idealization of a perfect world. I will present the corearguments and responses from David Hume, Gottfried Leibniz, J.L. Mackie and Alvin Plantinga. Irecognize that there are two types of evil – moral and natural, and that the problem of evil exists in twoforms – logical and evidential. However, I shall limit my discussion to moral evil and focus on how thefree will defense is an attempted logical but not evidential solution to the problem of evil. I aim tostrengthen the free will defense with reference to William James’s religious hypothesis and argue that ouractive faith reconciles the notion of our free will with God’s divine attributes. Our active faith is a deeplypersonal commitment that transcends objective uncertainty. Our subjective, inward reflections elucidateour deepest meaning of life and our most passionate relation to God.</abstract><pub>Ideas Forum International Academic and Scientific Association</pub><doi>10.26520/mcdsare.2018.2.176-181</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2601-839X |
ispartof | International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education, 2018-11, Vol.2 (2), p.176-181 |
issn | 2601-839X 2601-8403 2601-8403 2601-839X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_705077 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Philosophy |
title | ON THE WONDER OF LIFE AND THE FREEDOM OF WILL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A34%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ON%20THE%20WONDER%20OF%20LIFE%20AND%20THE%20FREEDOM%20OF%20WILL&rft.jtitle=International%20Multidisciplinary%20Scientific%20Conference%20on%20the%20Dialogue%20between%20Sciences%20&%20Arts,%20Religion%20&%20Education&rft.au=Yang,%20Steven%20Yue%20Heng&rft.date=2018-11-15&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=176-181&rft.issn=2601-839X&rft.eissn=2601-8403&rft_id=info:doi/10.26520/mcdsare.2018.2.176-181&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E705077%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=705077&rfr_iscdi=true |