Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi
Three political movements inspired by Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt, the National Outlook [Milli Görüş, NO], and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) in Turkey have employed miscellaneous political strategies since their emergence on the political arena. The strategies of two mov...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.17-48 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | tur |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Kurun, İsmail |
description | Three political movements inspired by Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt, the National Outlook [Milli Görüş, NO], and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) in Turkey have employed miscellaneous political strategies since their emergence on the political arena. The strategies of two movements, the MB and the NO, eventually carried them to power, yet strikingly, they both could remain in power for approximately one year, between 2012 and 2013, and between 1996 and 1997 respectively. Then, they were ousted by military coups. Being founded in 2001 by the former NO members after the 1997 military coup, the JDP has been in power since 2002 to date, 2017, by employing different strategies than the former two movements. This article aims at investigating why three political parties have differed so much in terms of their political success although their roots are almost in the same ideology, namely Islamism. Two research questions are formed and answered in the article that ultimately argues that political parties inspired by Islamism may differ in their levels of political success if they employ different political strategies. The article also determines the strategies that bring about political success to the extent that they relate to Islamism. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_685451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>685451</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>685451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_6854513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQx0zWyMDFhYeA0NDYw0TUxtzTjYOAtLs4yMDAwNDWyMDU15mQo8D2ysfjIxiKFslSFkMN7irIzK1MfNcxMSc3OVDg85_ByhSMbinMSczMVgjMrE4szFTwSi1KzU0sy82ACwSVFiSWpWZk5qUWZeUBh78Sio_OPbMxJPDq_BGhubmLOkY0KTplFCo55iTmZVZk8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBxs01xNlDNzk1NT8nPiu_tAiosDjezMLUxNTQmIA0ABnFUJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kurun, İsmail</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurun, İsmail</creatorcontrib><description>Three political movements inspired by Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt, the National Outlook [Milli Görüş, NO], and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) in Turkey have employed miscellaneous political strategies since their emergence on the political arena. The strategies of two movements, the MB and the NO, eventually carried them to power, yet strikingly, they both could remain in power for approximately one year, between 2012 and 2013, and between 1996 and 1997 respectively. Then, they were ousted by military coups. Being founded in 2001 by the former NO members after the 1997 military coup, the JDP has been in power since 2002 to date, 2017, by employing different strategies than the former two movements. This article aims at investigating why three political parties have differed so much in terms of their political success although their roots are almost in the same ideology, namely Islamism. Two research questions are formed and answered in the article that ultimately argues that political parties inspired by Islamism may differ in their levels of political success if they employ different political strategies. The article also determines the strategies that bring about political success to the extent that they relate to Islamism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1304-4796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2146-2844</identifier><language>tur</language><publisher>Celal Bayar University Social Sciences Institute</publisher><subject>Civil Society ; Comparative politics ; Islam studies ; Politics and religion ; Sociology of Religion</subject><ispartof>Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.17-48</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2017_41372.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,21342</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurun, İsmail</creatorcontrib><title>Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi</title><title>Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi</title><addtitle>Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences</addtitle><description>Three political movements inspired by Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt, the National Outlook [Milli Görüş, NO], and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) in Turkey have employed miscellaneous political strategies since their emergence on the political arena. The strategies of two movements, the MB and the NO, eventually carried them to power, yet strikingly, they both could remain in power for approximately one year, between 2012 and 2013, and between 1996 and 1997 respectively. Then, they were ousted by military coups. Being founded in 2001 by the former NO members after the 1997 military coup, the JDP has been in power since 2002 to date, 2017, by employing different strategies than the former two movements. This article aims at investigating why three political parties have differed so much in terms of their political success although their roots are almost in the same ideology, namely Islamism. Two research questions are formed and answered in the article that ultimately argues that political parties inspired by Islamism may differ in their levels of political success if they employ different political strategies. The article also determines the strategies that bring about political success to the extent that they relate to Islamism.</description><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Islam studies</subject><subject>Politics and religion</subject><subject>Sociology of Religion</subject><issn>1304-4796</issn><issn>2146-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQx0zWyMDFhYeA0NDYw0TUxtzTjYOAtLs4yMDAwNDWyMDU15mQo8D2ysfjIxiKFslSFkMN7irIzK1MfNcxMSc3OVDg85_ByhSMbinMSczMVgjMrE4szFTwSi1KzU0sy82ACwSVFiSWpWZk5qUWZeUBh78Sio_OPbMxJPDq_BGhubmLOkY0KTplFCo55iTmZVZk8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBxs01xNlDNzk1NT8nPiu_tAiosDjezMLUxNTQmIA0ABnFUJI</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Kurun, İsmail</creator><general>Celal Bayar University Social Sciences Institute</general><general>Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi</title><author>Kurun, İsmail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_6854513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>tur</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Islam studies</topic><topic>Politics and religion</topic><topic>Sociology of Religion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurun, İsmail</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurun, İsmail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi</atitle><jtitle>Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi</jtitle><addtitle>Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>17-48</pages><issn>1304-4796</issn><eissn>2146-2844</eissn><abstract>Three political movements inspired by Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt, the National Outlook [Milli Görüş, NO], and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) in Turkey have employed miscellaneous political strategies since their emergence on the political arena. The strategies of two movements, the MB and the NO, eventually carried them to power, yet strikingly, they both could remain in power for approximately one year, between 2012 and 2013, and between 1996 and 1997 respectively. Then, they were ousted by military coups. Being founded in 2001 by the former NO members after the 1997 military coup, the JDP has been in power since 2002 to date, 2017, by employing different strategies than the former two movements. This article aims at investigating why three political parties have differed so much in terms of their political success although their roots are almost in the same ideology, namely Islamism. Two research questions are formed and answered in the article that ultimately argues that political parties inspired by Islamism may differ in their levels of political success if they employ different political strategies. The article also determines the strategies that bring about political success to the extent that they relate to Islamism.</abstract><pub>Celal Bayar University Social Sciences Institute</pub><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1304-4796 |
ispartof | Celal Bayar Üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.17-48 |
issn | 1304-4796 2146-2844 |
language | tur |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_685451 |
source | Central and Eastern European Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Civil Society Comparative politics Islam studies Politics and religion Sociology of Religion |
title | Mısır ve Türkiye’deki Üç İslami Siyasi Hareketin Siyasi Stratejilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A55%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=M%C4%B1s%C4%B1r%20ve%20T%C3%BCrkiye%E2%80%99deki%20%C3%9C%C3%A7%20%C4%B0slami%20Siyasi%20Hareketin%20Siyasi%20Stratejilerinin%20Kar%C5%9F%C4%B1la%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmal%C4%B1%20Bir%20Analizi&rft.jtitle=Celal%20Bayar%20%C3%9Cniversitesi%20sosyal%20bilimler%20dergisi&rft.au=Kurun,%20%C4%B0smail&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=17-48&rft.issn=1304-4796&rft.eissn=2146-2844&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E685451%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=685451&rfr_iscdi=true |