Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ?
The establishment of modern constitutionalism, especially of the parliamentary regime in Romania, was achieved under the sign of a paradox. When the European Great Powers introduced in Romania (by means of the Paris Convention) a constitutional regime with an important authoritarian potential, by of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept 2008 (1-2), p.89-103 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | rum |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept |
container_volume | |
creator | Guțan, Manuel |
description | The establishment of modern constitutionalism, especially of the parliamentary regime in Romania, was achieved under the sign of a paradox. When the European Great Powers introduced in Romania (by means of the Paris Convention) a constitutional regime with an important authoritarian potential, by offering the prince extraordinary powers, the Romanian political class honestly fought for a parliamentary democracy. When there has been a chance to establish the most wanted parliamentary regime, an authoritarian regime was established by prince Cuza. The Romanian political life of the time clearly demonstrated that the principles of the parliamentary regime were difficult to apply and that the imported democratic forms were almost incompatible with the Romanian substance. The establishment and the perpetuation of the administrative/ authoritarian monarchy was an organic response of the Romanian society to the lack of interest and to the corruption of the politicians. It still remained open the problem and the challenge to find a solution within the limits of the Romanian politicianism. This is still valid today, when, in the context of a crisis created by the political corruption, the traditional solution of the authoritarian regime does not seem the appropriate one. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_675622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>675622</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>675622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_6756223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLsOAUEYRqcgIewbKKak2GTX2LWdQohGI3r5Ywe_zEXmopbsI6gp6L0EXsSTmEKv-pLv5JwaaabFgMVJnqUNElm7T5IkZVnGiqJJ7FwrMDsECqVEhdYZcHh8VbQL3mmDDsyr6tHP6Uw1PYCBErcyYAjX1XAQaKUXHj-nC11rZR06_75jqAr6fCi60PJ5U6EvdcmNCuaoTeobEJZHv22RznSyHM_iNedarPbam2DbVT7M8n6f_cFfLXlOQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Guțan, Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Guțan, Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>The establishment of modern constitutionalism, especially of the parliamentary regime in Romania, was achieved under the sign of a paradox. When the European Great Powers introduced in Romania (by means of the Paris Convention) a constitutional regime with an important authoritarian potential, by offering the prince extraordinary powers, the Romanian political class honestly fought for a parliamentary democracy. When there has been a chance to establish the most wanted parliamentary regime, an authoritarian regime was established by prince Cuza. The Romanian political life of the time clearly demonstrated that the principles of the parliamentary regime were difficult to apply and that the imported democratic forms were almost incompatible with the Romanian substance. The establishment and the perpetuation of the administrative/ authoritarian monarchy was an organic response of the Romanian society to the lack of interest and to the corruption of the politicians. It still remained open the problem and the challenge to find a solution within the limits of the Romanian politicianism. This is still valid today, when, in the context of a crisis created by the political corruption, the traditional solution of the authoritarian regime does not seem the appropriate one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1843-0651</identifier><language>rum</language><publisher>Universul Juridic</publisher><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept, 2008 (1-2), p.89-103</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2008_40726.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guțan, Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ?</title><title>Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept</title><addtitle>Annals of the West University of Timisoara Law Series</addtitle><description>The establishment of modern constitutionalism, especially of the parliamentary regime in Romania, was achieved under the sign of a paradox. When the European Great Powers introduced in Romania (by means of the Paris Convention) a constitutional regime with an important authoritarian potential, by offering the prince extraordinary powers, the Romanian political class honestly fought for a parliamentary democracy. When there has been a chance to establish the most wanted parliamentary regime, an authoritarian regime was established by prince Cuza. The Romanian political life of the time clearly demonstrated that the principles of the parliamentary regime were difficult to apply and that the imported democratic forms were almost incompatible with the Romanian substance. The establishment and the perpetuation of the administrative/ authoritarian monarchy was an organic response of the Romanian society to the lack of interest and to the corruption of the politicians. It still remained open the problem and the challenge to find a solution within the limits of the Romanian politicianism. This is still valid today, when, in the context of a crisis created by the political corruption, the traditional solution of the authoritarian regime does not seem the appropriate one.</description><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><issn>1843-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLsOAUEYRqcgIewbKKak2GTX2LWdQohGI3r5Ywe_zEXmopbsI6gp6L0EXsSTmEKv-pLv5JwaaabFgMVJnqUNElm7T5IkZVnGiqJJ7FwrMDsECqVEhdYZcHh8VbQL3mmDDsyr6tHP6Uw1PYCBErcyYAjX1XAQaKUXHj-nC11rZR06_75jqAr6fCi60PJ5U6EvdcmNCuaoTeobEJZHv22RznSyHM_iNedarPbam2DbVT7M8n6f_cFfLXlOQQ</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Guțan, Manuel</creator><general>Universul Juridic</general><general>Universe of Law</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ?</title><author>Guțan, Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_6756223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>rum</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guțan, Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guțan, Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ?</atitle><jtitle>Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept</jtitle><addtitle>Annals of the West University of Timisoara Law Series</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><issue>1-2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>89-103</pages><issn>1843-0651</issn><abstract>The establishment of modern constitutionalism, especially of the parliamentary regime in Romania, was achieved under the sign of a paradox. When the European Great Powers introduced in Romania (by means of the Paris Convention) a constitutional regime with an important authoritarian potential, by offering the prince extraordinary powers, the Romanian political class honestly fought for a parliamentary democracy. When there has been a chance to establish the most wanted parliamentary regime, an authoritarian regime was established by prince Cuza. The Romanian political life of the time clearly demonstrated that the principles of the parliamentary regime were difficult to apply and that the imported democratic forms were almost incompatible with the Romanian substance. The establishment and the perpetuation of the administrative/ authoritarian monarchy was an organic response of the Romanian society to the lack of interest and to the corruption of the politicians. It still remained open the problem and the challenge to find a solution within the limits of the Romanian politicianism. This is still valid today, when, in the context of a crisis created by the political corruption, the traditional solution of the authoritarian regime does not seem the appropriate one.</abstract><pub>Universul Juridic</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1843-0651 |
ispartof | Analele Universității de Vest din Timișoara. Seria drept, 2008 (1-2), p.89-103 |
issn | 1843-0651 |
language | rum |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_675622 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |
title | Monarhia administrativă (autoritară) – o paradigmă a „realismului” constituţional în România modernă ? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monarhia%20administrativ%C4%83%20(autoritar%C4%83)%20%E2%80%93%20o%20paradigm%C4%83%20a%20%E2%80%9Erealismului%E2%80%9D%20constitu%C5%A3ional%20%C3%AEn%20Rom%C3%A2nia%20modern%C4%83%20?&rft.jtitle=Analele%20Universit%C4%83%C8%9Bii%20de%20Vest%20din%20Timi%C8%99oara.%20Seria%20drept&rft.au=Gu%C8%9Ban,%20Manuel&rft.date=2008&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=89-103&rft.issn=1843-0651&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E675622%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=675622&rfr_iscdi=true |