Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване
The article analyses the differences between the crime under art. 225, par. 1, second proposition, with the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the Criminal Code (CC). Both crimes are compared by their direct object of crime and their objective characteristics. The article also contains analysis of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Spisanie De jure 2012, Vol.5 (2), p.21-24 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | bul |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 24 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Spisanie De jure |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Kolev, Veselin |
| description | The article analyses the differences between the crime under art. 225, par. 1, second proposition, with the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the Criminal Code (CC). Both crimes are compared by their direct object of crime and their objective characteristics. The article also contains analysis of the limited case law on the matter. On this basis the author justifies the thesis that the actual tax crime under art. 225, par. 1, first and second proposition of the CC encompasses the specific document crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC. According to him, this indicates the necessity of abolition of the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC and unification of the legal regime of tax evasion which should be placed in the Crimes against the financial, tax and insurance systems section of the Criminal Code. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_667986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>667986</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>667986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_6679863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMFKw0AQXUXBoP0DD_MBpmSzTdKcRfEDvJci8VCKBYP3GhGxl94F8RdiMBCITX_h7R85s0bwpped2ffmvbezu8oLTZz445EO9pSnjR75YZSaAzXI81kQBDrVcZgk3o7Bm12iwzta1PhEQ9gy0JC9tyts0XEtUKKya2xQEx_l90gtjJsR5QYNIwU6EhHZJ7RDCqPohFjMre5F-JAb2_GoBEu7QiVlOeRQsgXriMmC8IoXgf4bZ7T5ifvt4JaR1dxKrbxfOHZb20d26pyPIysec0ECO8g-90BlH5gu5ROO1P71dJ5ng74equPzs8vTC_8qyxbzyWxxd3vD-CSOk3Qcmz_oLxx44D8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kolev, Veselin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolev, Veselin</creatorcontrib><description>The article analyses the differences between the crime under art. 225, par. 1, second proposition, with the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the Criminal Code (CC). Both crimes are compared by their direct object of crime and their objective characteristics. The article also contains analysis of the limited case law on the matter. On this basis the author justifies the thesis that the actual tax crime under art. 225, par. 1, first and second proposition of the CC encompasses the specific document crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC. According to him, this indicates the necessity of abolition of the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC and unification of the legal regime of tax evasion which should be placed in the Crimes against the financial, tax and insurance systems section of the Criminal Code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1314-2593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2367-8410</identifier><language>bul</language><publisher>Великотърновски университет „Св. св. Кирил и Методий</publisher><subject>Canon Law / Church Law ; Civil Law ; Constitutional Law ; Human Rights and Humanitarian Law ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence ; Philosophy of Law ; Sociology of Law</subject><ispartof>Spisanie De jure, 2012, Vol.5 (2), p.21-24</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2012_40182.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21341</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolev, Veselin</creatorcontrib><title>Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване</title><title>Spisanie De jure</title><addtitle>De Jure</addtitle><description>The article analyses the differences between the crime under art. 225, par. 1, second proposition, with the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the Criminal Code (CC). Both crimes are compared by their direct object of crime and their objective characteristics. The article also contains analysis of the limited case law on the matter. On this basis the author justifies the thesis that the actual tax crime under art. 225, par. 1, first and second proposition of the CC encompasses the specific document crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC. According to him, this indicates the necessity of abolition of the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC and unification of the legal regime of tax evasion which should be placed in the Crimes against the financial, tax and insurance systems section of the Criminal Code.</description><subject>Canon Law / Church Law</subject><subject>Civil Law</subject><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><subject>Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Sociology of Law</subject><issn>1314-2593</issn><issn>2367-8410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMFKw0AQXUXBoP0DD_MBpmSzTdKcRfEDvJci8VCKBYP3GhGxl94F8RdiMBCITX_h7R85s0bwpped2ffmvbezu8oLTZz445EO9pSnjR75YZSaAzXI81kQBDrVcZgk3o7Bm12iwzta1PhEQ9gy0JC9tyts0XEtUKKya2xQEx_l90gtjJsR5QYNIwU6EhHZJ7RDCqPohFjMre5F-JAb2_GoBEu7QiVlOeRQsgXriMmC8IoXgf4bZ7T5ifvt4JaR1dxKrbxfOHZb20d26pyPIysec0ECO8g-90BlH5gu5ROO1P71dJ5ng74equPzs8vTC_8qyxbzyWxxd3vD-CSOk3Qcmz_oLxx44D8</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Kolev, Veselin</creator><general>Великотърновски университет „Св. св. Кирил и Методий</general><general>“St. Cyril and St. Methodius” University of Veliko Tarnovo</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване</title><author>Kolev, Veselin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_6679863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>bul</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Canon Law / Church Law</topic><topic>Civil Law</topic><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><topic>Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Sociology of Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolev, Veselin</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Spisanie De jure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolev, Veselin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване</atitle><jtitle>Spisanie De jure</jtitle><addtitle>De Jure</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>21-24</pages><issn>1314-2593</issn><eissn>2367-8410</eissn><abstract>The article analyses the differences between the crime under art. 225, par. 1, second proposition, with the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the Criminal Code (CC). Both crimes are compared by their direct object of crime and their objective characteristics. The article also contains analysis of the limited case law on the matter. On this basis the author justifies the thesis that the actual tax crime under art. 225, par. 1, first and second proposition of the CC encompasses the specific document crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC. According to him, this indicates the necessity of abolition of the crime under art. 313, par. 2 of the CC and unification of the legal regime of tax evasion which should be placed in the Crimes against the financial, tax and insurance systems section of the Criminal Code.</abstract><pub>Великотърновски университет „Св. св. Кирил и Методий</pub><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1314-2593 |
| ispartof | Spisanie De jure, 2012, Vol.5 (2), p.21-24 |
| issn | 1314-2593 2367-8410 |
| language | bul |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_667986 |
| source | Central and Eastern European Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Canon Law / Church Law Civil Law Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Philosophy of Law Sociology of Law |
| title | Проблеми при съпоставяне на престъплението по чл. 255, ал. 1 предл. второ във вр. с т. 2 от НК с престъплението по чл. 313, ал. 2 от НК и смисъла от тяхното съвместно съществуване |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%20%D1%81%D1%8A%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B5%20%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8A%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%20%D1%87%D0%BB.%20255,%20%D0%B0%D0%BB.%201%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BB.%20%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%20%D0%B2%D1%8A%D0%B2%20%D0%B2%D1%80.%20%D1%81%20%D1%82.%202%20%D0%BE%D1%82%20%D0%9D%D0%9A%20%D1%81%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8A%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%20%D1%87%D0%BB.%20313,%20%D0%B0%D0%BB.%202%20%D0%BE%D1%82%20%D0%9D%D0%9A%20%D0%B8%20%D1%81%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B0%20%D0%BE%D1%82%20%D1%82%D1%8F%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D1%81%D1%8A%D0%B2%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%81%D1%8A%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5&rft.jtitle=Spisanie%20De%20jure&rft.au=Kolev,%20Veselin&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=21-24&rft.issn=1314-2593&rft.eissn=2367-8410&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E667986%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=667986&rfr_iscdi=true |