КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ

The aim of this paper is to point out that the guarantees of judicial independence have to be regulated by the Constitution as they create de iure framework for the independence of the judiciary in the rule of law system. The author is aware that the constitutional guarantees are per se insufficient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 2014, Vol.LIII (68), p.157-174
1. Verfasser: Pejić, Irena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:srp
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 68
container_start_page 157
container_title Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu
container_volume LIII
creator Pejić, Irena
description The aim of this paper is to point out that the guarantees of judicial independence have to be regulated by the Constitution as they create de iure framework for the independence of the judiciary in the rule of law system. The author is aware that the constitutional guarantees are per se insufficient and that their primary features may yield different effects depending on the political environment and cultural matrix in which they take effect. The judicial system operates in the circumstances of the separation of powers, where the independent judiciary is corroborated a guarantee of the rule of law. Hence, it is important to concurrently elaborate on the institutional and personal guarantees of judicial independence, focusing on the responsibility of the political authorities to create a relevant social environment for the operation of the independent judiciary as well as on the responsibility of the judiciary to independently exercise their judicial function. The author’s intention in this paper is to provides a comparative analysis on the guarantees of independent judiciary and the minimum rules that constitute the cohesive core which serves as the common meeting grounds not only for the EU member states but also for all countries of the European-Continental legal system in their efforts to ensure the judicial independence as the primary condition for exercising the rule of law. The corpus of constitutional guarantees on independent judiciary includes the following elements: the judicial appointments and termination of a judicial office; the permanence of the judicial office and impartiality in decision-making processes; the professional responsibility and judicial immunity; as well as the recently established judicial councils, which have been given the constitutional authority to protect the independence of the judiciary.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_648340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>648340</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>648340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_6483403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDY10LUwNTDkYOAtLs4yMDAwMjC2NLUw5WRovjDrwrwLcy8svLDowgwgXnxhGZAGiUy4MBvImg6kQSIdFyYoABUtvjAFSM66MFUBqGIqWHYSUHYhkDcPYoaVAlDRfCBvAVB-Ckhc4cIMBbCaWUAZkJpJILGFQAUTwQZP5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrrJqan5OfFZ-aVFeUDxeDMTC2MTA2MC0gC4D3WN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Pejić, Irena</creator><creatorcontrib>Pejić, Irena</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this paper is to point out that the guarantees of judicial independence have to be regulated by the Constitution as they create de iure framework for the independence of the judiciary in the rule of law system. The author is aware that the constitutional guarantees are per se insufficient and that their primary features may yield different effects depending on the political environment and cultural matrix in which they take effect. The judicial system operates in the circumstances of the separation of powers, where the independent judiciary is corroborated a guarantee of the rule of law. Hence, it is important to concurrently elaborate on the institutional and personal guarantees of judicial independence, focusing on the responsibility of the political authorities to create a relevant social environment for the operation of the independent judiciary as well as on the responsibility of the judiciary to independently exercise their judicial function. The author’s intention in this paper is to provides a comparative analysis on the guarantees of independent judiciary and the minimum rules that constitute the cohesive core which serves as the common meeting grounds not only for the EU member states but also for all countries of the European-Continental legal system in their efforts to ensure the judicial independence as the primary condition for exercising the rule of law. The corpus of constitutional guarantees on independent judiciary includes the following elements: the judicial appointments and termination of a judicial office; the permanence of the judicial office and impartiality in decision-making processes; the professional responsibility and judicial immunity; as well as the recently established judicial councils, which have been given the constitutional authority to protect the independence of the judiciary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0350-8501</identifier><language>srp</language><publisher>Правни факултет Универзитета у Нишу</publisher><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><ispartof>Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 2014, Vol.LIII (68), p.157-174</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4023</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pejić, Irena</creatorcontrib><title>КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ</title><title>Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu</title><addtitle>Collection of Papers, Faculty of Law, Niš</addtitle><description>The aim of this paper is to point out that the guarantees of judicial independence have to be regulated by the Constitution as they create de iure framework for the independence of the judiciary in the rule of law system. The author is aware that the constitutional guarantees are per se insufficient and that their primary features may yield different effects depending on the political environment and cultural matrix in which they take effect. The judicial system operates in the circumstances of the separation of powers, where the independent judiciary is corroborated a guarantee of the rule of law. Hence, it is important to concurrently elaborate on the institutional and personal guarantees of judicial independence, focusing on the responsibility of the political authorities to create a relevant social environment for the operation of the independent judiciary as well as on the responsibility of the judiciary to independently exercise their judicial function. The author’s intention in this paper is to provides a comparative analysis on the guarantees of independent judiciary and the minimum rules that constitute the cohesive core which serves as the common meeting grounds not only for the EU member states but also for all countries of the European-Continental legal system in their efforts to ensure the judicial independence as the primary condition for exercising the rule of law. The corpus of constitutional guarantees on independent judiciary includes the following elements: the judicial appointments and termination of a judicial office; the permanence of the judicial office and impartiality in decision-making processes; the professional responsibility and judicial immunity; as well as the recently established judicial councils, which have been given the constitutional authority to protect the independence of the judiciary.</description><subject>Constitutional Law</subject><issn>0350-8501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDY10LUwNTDkYOAtLs4yMDAwMjC2NLUw5WRovjDrwrwLcy8svLDowgwgXnxhGZAGiUy4MBvImg6kQSIdFyYoABUtvjAFSM66MFUBqGIqWHYSUHYhkDcPYoaVAlDRfCBvAVB-Ckhc4cIMBbCaWUAZkJpJILGFQAUTwQZP5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrrJqan5OfFZ-aVFeUDxeDMTC2MTA2MC0gC4D3WN</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Pejić, Irena</creator><general>Правни факултет Универзитета у Нишу</general><general>Faculty of Law - University of Niš</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ</title><author>Pejić, Irena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_6483403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>srp</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Constitutional Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pejić, Irena</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pejić, Irena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ</atitle><jtitle>Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu</jtitle><addtitle>Collection of Papers, Faculty of Law, Niš</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>LIII</volume><issue>68</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>157-174</pages><issn>0350-8501</issn><abstract>The aim of this paper is to point out that the guarantees of judicial independence have to be regulated by the Constitution as they create de iure framework for the independence of the judiciary in the rule of law system. The author is aware that the constitutional guarantees are per se insufficient and that their primary features may yield different effects depending on the political environment and cultural matrix in which they take effect. The judicial system operates in the circumstances of the separation of powers, where the independent judiciary is corroborated a guarantee of the rule of law. Hence, it is important to concurrently elaborate on the institutional and personal guarantees of judicial independence, focusing on the responsibility of the political authorities to create a relevant social environment for the operation of the independent judiciary as well as on the responsibility of the judiciary to independently exercise their judicial function. The author’s intention in this paper is to provides a comparative analysis on the guarantees of independent judiciary and the minimum rules that constitute the cohesive core which serves as the common meeting grounds not only for the EU member states but also for all countries of the European-Continental legal system in their efforts to ensure the judicial independence as the primary condition for exercising the rule of law. The corpus of constitutional guarantees on independent judiciary includes the following elements: the judicial appointments and termination of a judicial office; the permanence of the judicial office and impartiality in decision-making processes; the professional responsibility and judicial immunity; as well as the recently established judicial councils, which have been given the constitutional authority to protect the independence of the judiciary.</abstract><pub>Правни факултет Универзитета у Нишу</pub><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0350-8501
ispartof Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 2014, Vol.LIII (68), p.157-174
issn 0350-8501
language srp
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_648340
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Constitutional Law
title КОНСТИТУЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИЈА СУДСКЕ НЕЗАВИСНОСТИ: УПОРЕДНО И ИСКУСТВО СРБИЈЕ
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9A%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%A2%D0%A3%D0%A6%D0%98%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%9B%D0%98%D0%97%D0%90%D0%A6%D0%98%D0%88%D0%90%20%D0%A1%D0%A3%D0%94%D0%A1%D0%9A%D0%95%20%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%97%D0%90%D0%92%D0%98%D0%A1%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%98:%20%D0%A3%D0%9F%D0%9E%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%94%D0%9D%D0%9E%20%D0%98%20%D0%98%D0%A1%D0%9A%D0%A3%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%92%D0%9E%20%D0%A1%D0%A0%D0%91%D0%98%D0%88%D0%95&rft.jtitle=Zbornik%20radova%20Pravnog%20fakulteta%20u%20Ni%C5%A1u&rft.au=Peji%C4%87,%20Irena&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=LIII&rft.issue=68&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=157-174&rft.issn=0350-8501&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E648340%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=648340&rfr_iscdi=true