PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR

The excavations carried out by the present authors in the Getic cemeteries at Boroseşti (Iaşi County) and Poieneşti (Vaslui County), dated to the 5th – 3rd c. BC, brought new data concerning funerary practices typical for this period; they consist mainly in the alternative use of inhumation and crem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arheologia Moldovei 2011, Vol.34 (1), p.103-149
Hauptverfasser: Babeş, Mircea, Miriţoiu, Nicolae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Arheologia Moldovei
container_volume 34
creator Babeş, Mircea
Miriţoiu, Nicolae
description The excavations carried out by the present authors in the Getic cemeteries at Boroseşti (Iaşi County) and Poieneşti (Vaslui County), dated to the 5th – 3rd c. BC, brought new data concerning funerary practices typical for this period; they consist mainly in the alternative use of inhumation and cremation during prolonged burial practices. Our starting point was the discovery of two funerary structures having the shape and dimensions of inhumation graves as well as grave goods, but lacking bones (at Boroseşti); at the same time were found graves with cremated bones laid in similarly over dimensioned pits, i.e. pits which had the sizes of inhumation graves (at Boroseşti, and especially at Poieneşti). This phenomenon is widely distributed, from Dniester (Nistru, Dnestr) to Tisza (Tisa) River; it is most clearly attested in the cemeteries from Slobozia-Oneşti, Stelnica, Zimnicea, Fântânele, Teliţa, Murighiol, Băiţa, Olteni(Romania), Dănceni and Pîrjolteni (Moldovian Republic), Szentes-Vekerzug and Tápiószele (Hungary). In these authors opinion, the large grave pits served initially as „provisional graves”; after some time, the corpses were exhumed and cremated, the cremated bones being afterwards either laid back in the initial pits or put in other places. When the latter was the case, in the former „provisional graves” – considered by some authors „cenotaphs” –, one can find remains of grave goods, but no bones. The outfit of the funerary structures with wood, stone and clay (e.g. at Dănceni, Zimnicea, Olteni, etc.) shows that they were accessible for the duration of the prolonged funerary practices, thus allowing for repeated ceremonies and ritual acts to take place at/in the graves. The existence of biritual, prolongued funerary practices is also attested by the ethnography of indigenous populations, both recent and contemporary.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_602589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>602589</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>602589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_6025893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjUw1DW1sDRmYeA0MDAz0zU3NrXgYOAtLs4yMDAwNLU0Mbew4GRIDAhydA7xdPZUcAv1cw1yDHJVcPIM8gwJdfRxVQgIcvUJ9XP3DHFVONznpxAc4Hh0kWeoj4KzY1CAY4i_rkuo35GmIFdHP4i0q7O_jytQW9ijhsmenp4KjnoKzh5BPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcbNNcTZQzc5NTU_Jz4rv7QoDygeb2ZgBHIuAWkAFKQ88Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Babeş, Mircea ; Miriţoiu, Nicolae</creator><creatorcontrib>Babeş, Mircea ; Miriţoiu, Nicolae</creatorcontrib><description>The excavations carried out by the present authors in the Getic cemeteries at Boroseşti (Iaşi County) and Poieneşti (Vaslui County), dated to the 5th – 3rd c. BC, brought new data concerning funerary practices typical for this period; they consist mainly in the alternative use of inhumation and cremation during prolonged burial practices. Our starting point was the discovery of two funerary structures having the shape and dimensions of inhumation graves as well as grave goods, but lacking bones (at Boroseşti); at the same time were found graves with cremated bones laid in similarly over dimensioned pits, i.e. pits which had the sizes of inhumation graves (at Boroseşti, and especially at Poieneşti). This phenomenon is widely distributed, from Dniester (Nistru, Dnestr) to Tisza (Tisa) River; it is most clearly attested in the cemeteries from Slobozia-Oneşti, Stelnica, Zimnicea, Fântânele, Teliţa, Murighiol, Băiţa, Olteni(Romania), Dănceni and Pîrjolteni (Moldovian Republic), Szentes-Vekerzug and Tápiószele (Hungary). In these authors opinion, the large grave pits served initially as „provisional graves”; after some time, the corpses were exhumed and cremated, the cremated bones being afterwards either laid back in the initial pits or put in other places. When the latter was the case, in the former „provisional graves” – considered by some authors „cenotaphs” –, one can find remains of grave goods, but no bones. The outfit of the funerary structures with wood, stone and clay (e.g. at Dănceni, Zimnicea, Olteni, etc.) shows that they were accessible for the duration of the prolonged funerary practices, thus allowing for repeated ceremonies and ritual acts to take place at/in the graves. The existence of biritual, prolongued funerary practices is also attested by the ethnography of indigenous populations, both recent and contemporary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-7358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2501-5893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Editura Academiei Române</publisher><subject>Ancient World ; Archaeology ; Comparative history ; Cultural history ; Ethnohistory ; History ; History of Religion ; Religion and science ; Sociology of Religion ; Theology and Religion</subject><ispartof>Arheologia Moldovei, 2011, Vol.34 (1), p.103-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2011_31817.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Babeş, Mircea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miriţoiu, Nicolae</creatorcontrib><title>PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR</title><title>Arheologia Moldovei</title><addtitle>Archaeology of Moldavia (Romania)</addtitle><description>The excavations carried out by the present authors in the Getic cemeteries at Boroseşti (Iaşi County) and Poieneşti (Vaslui County), dated to the 5th – 3rd c. BC, brought new data concerning funerary practices typical for this period; they consist mainly in the alternative use of inhumation and cremation during prolonged burial practices. Our starting point was the discovery of two funerary structures having the shape and dimensions of inhumation graves as well as grave goods, but lacking bones (at Boroseşti); at the same time were found graves with cremated bones laid in similarly over dimensioned pits, i.e. pits which had the sizes of inhumation graves (at Boroseşti, and especially at Poieneşti). This phenomenon is widely distributed, from Dniester (Nistru, Dnestr) to Tisza (Tisa) River; it is most clearly attested in the cemeteries from Slobozia-Oneşti, Stelnica, Zimnicea, Fântânele, Teliţa, Murighiol, Băiţa, Olteni(Romania), Dănceni and Pîrjolteni (Moldovian Republic), Szentes-Vekerzug and Tápiószele (Hungary). In these authors opinion, the large grave pits served initially as „provisional graves”; after some time, the corpses were exhumed and cremated, the cremated bones being afterwards either laid back in the initial pits or put in other places. When the latter was the case, in the former „provisional graves” – considered by some authors „cenotaphs” –, one can find remains of grave goods, but no bones. The outfit of the funerary structures with wood, stone and clay (e.g. at Dănceni, Zimnicea, Olteni, etc.) shows that they were accessible for the duration of the prolonged funerary practices, thus allowing for repeated ceremonies and ritual acts to take place at/in the graves. The existence of biritual, prolongued funerary practices is also attested by the ethnography of indigenous populations, both recent and contemporary.</description><subject>Ancient World</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Comparative history</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Ethnohistory</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of Religion</subject><subject>Religion and science</subject><subject>Sociology of Religion</subject><subject>Theology and Religion</subject><issn>0066-7358</issn><issn>2501-5893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjUw1DW1sDRmYeA0MDAz0zU3NrXgYOAtLs4yMDAwNLU0Mbew4GRIDAhydA7xdPZUcAv1cw1yDHJVcPIM8gwJdfRxVQgIcvUJ9XP3DHFVONznpxAc4Hh0kWeoj4KzY1CAY4i_rkuo35GmIFdHP4i0q7O_jytQW9ijhsmenp4KjnoKzh5BPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcbNNcTZQzc5NTU_Jz4rv7QoDygeb2ZgBHIuAWkAFKQ88Q</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Babeş, Mircea</creator><creator>Miriţoiu, Nicolae</creator><general>Editura Academiei Române</general><general>Romanian Academy Publishing House</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR</title><author>Babeş, Mircea ; Miriţoiu, Nicolae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_6025893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ancient World</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Comparative history</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Ethnohistory</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of Religion</topic><topic>Religion and science</topic><topic>Sociology of Religion</topic><topic>Theology and Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Babeş, Mircea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miriţoiu, Nicolae</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Arheologia Moldovei</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Babeş, Mircea</au><au>Miriţoiu, Nicolae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR</atitle><jtitle>Arheologia Moldovei</jtitle><addtitle>Archaeology of Moldavia (Romania)</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>103-149</pages><issn>0066-7358</issn><eissn>2501-5893</eissn><abstract>The excavations carried out by the present authors in the Getic cemeteries at Boroseşti (Iaşi County) and Poieneşti (Vaslui County), dated to the 5th – 3rd c. BC, brought new data concerning funerary practices typical for this period; they consist mainly in the alternative use of inhumation and cremation during prolonged burial practices. Our starting point was the discovery of two funerary structures having the shape and dimensions of inhumation graves as well as grave goods, but lacking bones (at Boroseşti); at the same time were found graves with cremated bones laid in similarly over dimensioned pits, i.e. pits which had the sizes of inhumation graves (at Boroseşti, and especially at Poieneşti). This phenomenon is widely distributed, from Dniester (Nistru, Dnestr) to Tisza (Tisa) River; it is most clearly attested in the cemeteries from Slobozia-Oneşti, Stelnica, Zimnicea, Fântânele, Teliţa, Murighiol, Băiţa, Olteni(Romania), Dănceni and Pîrjolteni (Moldovian Republic), Szentes-Vekerzug and Tápiószele (Hungary). In these authors opinion, the large grave pits served initially as „provisional graves”; after some time, the corpses were exhumed and cremated, the cremated bones being afterwards either laid back in the initial pits or put in other places. When the latter was the case, in the former „provisional graves” – considered by some authors „cenotaphs” –, one can find remains of grave goods, but no bones. The outfit of the funerary structures with wood, stone and clay (e.g. at Dănceni, Zimnicea, Olteni, etc.) shows that they were accessible for the duration of the prolonged funerary practices, thus allowing for repeated ceremonies and ritual acts to take place at/in the graves. The existence of biritual, prolongued funerary practices is also attested by the ethnography of indigenous populations, both recent and contemporary.</abstract><pub>Editura Academiei Române</pub><tpages>47</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-7358
ispartof Arheologia Moldovei, 2011, Vol.34 (1), p.103-149
issn 0066-7358
2501-5893
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_602589
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ancient World
Archaeology
Comparative history
Cultural history
Ethnohistory
History
History of Religion
Religion and science
Sociology of Religion
Theology and Religion
title PRACTICI FUNERARE BIRITUALE PRELUNGITE ÎN SPAŢIUL CARPATO-DUNĂREAN ÎN SECOLELE V–III A. CHR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A21%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PRACTICI%20FUNERARE%20BIRITUALE%20PRELUNGITE%20%C3%8EN%20SPA%C5%A2IUL%20CARPATO-DUN%C4%82REAN%20%C3%8EN%20SECOLELE%20V%E2%80%93III%20A.%20CHR&rft.jtitle=Arheologia%20Moldovei&rft.au=Babe%C5%9F,%20Mircea&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=103-149&rft.issn=0066-7358&rft.eissn=2501-5893&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E602589%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=602589&rfr_iscdi=true