Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego
The principal theme of the article is the ontological status of Michel Foucault's archaeology of knowledge, with reference to “aporetic” source of its inspiration, which was undoubtedly structuralism and lacanian psychoanalysis. If Foucault's main notion – discourse, is based on the socio-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Praktyka Teoretyczna 2016 (22), p.45-87 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | pol |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Praktyka Teoretyczna |
container_volume | |
creator | Błesznowski, Bartłomiej |
description | The principal theme of the article is the ontological status of Michel Foucault's archaeology of knowledge, with reference to “aporetic” source of its inspiration, which was undoubtedly structuralism and lacanian psychoanalysis. If Foucault's main notion – discourse, is based on the socio-historical permanence of statements related to the same formation rules, discourse formation is the field where the statements are linked and stabilized in their division. The major issue is the materiality of these statements, and consequently the material transformation rules of discourse emergence, the constitutive principle of discontinuity. As Gilles Deleuze wrote: “The present is a roll the dice [...] in one go, bones and rules are rolling”. The discourse is not just a collection of more or less structured rules, but rather a set of practices that perform an act; subjects (individual or collective) therefore do not have a permanent, structured identity within the discourse, but rather represent a constant change and the result of empowerment practices which have their own history. Reproduction of discourse is at the core of Foucault’s method (also after the “archaeological” period), which could lead us to formulate a concept of “extradiscursive politics”. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_555842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>555842</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>555842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_5558423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MrAw1LUwNDZgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYGpsYGZkZcjIEuFQWZ5cWFStkJWbnKxQUJVZkFuspOBYlZ6Tm5-SnZyYqlGemplRVQuRLUvOLgEK5iSWpQDonsyq3VKEgtSgtvwgoVFmel5qez8PAmpaYU5zKC6W5GWTcXEOcPXSTU4EmxmfllxblAcXjTU1NLUyMjAlIAwC-Nz1O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</creator><creatorcontrib>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><description>The principal theme of the article is the ontological status of Michel Foucault's archaeology of knowledge, with reference to “aporetic” source of its inspiration, which was undoubtedly structuralism and lacanian psychoanalysis. If Foucault's main notion – discourse, is based on the socio-historical permanence of statements related to the same formation rules, discourse formation is the field where the statements are linked and stabilized in their division. The major issue is the materiality of these statements, and consequently the material transformation rules of discourse emergence, the constitutive principle of discontinuity. As Gilles Deleuze wrote: “The present is a roll the dice [...] in one go, bones and rules are rolling”. The discourse is not just a collection of more or less structured rules, but rather a set of practices that perform an act; subjects (individual or collective) therefore do not have a permanent, structured identity within the discourse, but rather represent a constant change and the result of empowerment practices which have their own history. Reproduction of discourse is at the core of Foucault’s method (also after the “archaeological” period), which could lead us to formulate a concept of “extradiscursive politics”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2081-8130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2081-8130</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza</publisher><subject>Psychoanalysis ; Social Theory ; Structuralism and Post-Structuralism</subject><ispartof>Praktyka Teoretyczna, 2016 (22), p.45-87</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2016_33852.PNG</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><title>Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego</title><title>Praktyka Teoretyczna</title><addtitle>Theoretical Practice</addtitle><description>The principal theme of the article is the ontological status of Michel Foucault's archaeology of knowledge, with reference to “aporetic” source of its inspiration, which was undoubtedly structuralism and lacanian psychoanalysis. If Foucault's main notion – discourse, is based on the socio-historical permanence of statements related to the same formation rules, discourse formation is the field where the statements are linked and stabilized in their division. The major issue is the materiality of these statements, and consequently the material transformation rules of discourse emergence, the constitutive principle of discontinuity. As Gilles Deleuze wrote: “The present is a roll the dice [...] in one go, bones and rules are rolling”. The discourse is not just a collection of more or less structured rules, but rather a set of practices that perform an act; subjects (individual or collective) therefore do not have a permanent, structured identity within the discourse, but rather represent a constant change and the result of empowerment practices which have their own history. Reproduction of discourse is at the core of Foucault’s method (also after the “archaeological” period), which could lead us to formulate a concept of “extradiscursive politics”.</description><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Social Theory</subject><subject>Structuralism and Post-Structuralism</subject><issn>2081-8130</issn><issn>2081-8130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MrAw1LUwNDZgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYGpsYGZkZcjIEuFQWZ5cWFStkJWbnKxQUJVZkFuspOBYlZ6Tm5-SnZyYqlGemplRVQuRLUvOLgEK5iSWpQDonsyq3VKEgtSgtvwgoVFmel5qez8PAmpaYU5zKC6W5GWTcXEOcPXSTU4EmxmfllxblAcXjTU1NLUyMjAlIAwC-Nz1O</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</creator><general>Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza</general><general>Adam Mickiewicz University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego</title><author>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_5558423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Social Theory</topic><topic>Structuralism and Post-Structuralism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Praktyka Teoretyczna</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Błesznowski, Bartłomiej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego</atitle><jtitle>Praktyka Teoretyczna</jtitle><addtitle>Theoretical Practice</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issue>22</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>45-87</pages><issn>2081-8130</issn><eissn>2081-8130</eissn><abstract>The principal theme of the article is the ontological status of Michel Foucault's archaeology of knowledge, with reference to “aporetic” source of its inspiration, which was undoubtedly structuralism and lacanian psychoanalysis. If Foucault's main notion – discourse, is based on the socio-historical permanence of statements related to the same formation rules, discourse formation is the field where the statements are linked and stabilized in their division. The major issue is the materiality of these statements, and consequently the material transformation rules of discourse emergence, the constitutive principle of discontinuity. As Gilles Deleuze wrote: “The present is a roll the dice [...] in one go, bones and rules are rolling”. The discourse is not just a collection of more or less structured rules, but rather a set of practices that perform an act; subjects (individual or collective) therefore do not have a permanent, structured identity within the discourse, but rather represent a constant change and the result of empowerment practices which have their own history. Reproduction of discourse is at the core of Foucault’s method (also after the “archaeological” period), which could lead us to formulate a concept of “extradiscursive politics”.</abstract><pub>Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza</pub><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2081-8130 |
ispartof | Praktyka Teoretyczna, 2016 (22), p.45-87 |
issn | 2081-8130 2081-8130 |
language | pol |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_555842 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Psychoanalysis Social Theory Structuralism and Post-Structuralism |
title | Dyskurs jako praxis. Archeologia wiedzy jako teoria materializmu performatywnego |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A07%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dyskurs%20jako%20praxis.%20Archeologia%20wiedzy%20jako%20teoria%20materializmu%20performatywnego&rft.jtitle=Praktyka%20Teoretyczna&rft.au=B%C5%82esznowski,%20Bart%C5%82omiej&rft.date=2016&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=45-87&rft.issn=2081-8130&rft.eissn=2081-8130&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E555842%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=555842&rfr_iscdi=true |