Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira
In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociologija 2017, Vol.59 (2), p.139-155 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | srp |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Sociologija |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Prodanović, Srđan |
description | In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology – and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense putforward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_545533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>545533</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>545533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_5455333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFybsKwjAUgOEMCtbLGzjkBQopaSCOIl5GB_dyqKmcJM2BpMnQp7eDu9MH_79ilRBS10I2esO2KVkh2kaddMXOT5pM6NGC5_M7QqEIcx6TM9xFnHAx8zsNIwQqZHmiHsnTBy1ycgUj7Nl6AJ_M4eeOHW_X1-VR98aQ7yzlGJbeqVYpKeWf_QVyfzVU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Prodanović, Srđan</creator><creatorcontrib>Prodanović, Srđan</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology – and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense putforward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0318</identifier><language>srp</language><publisher>Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia</publisher><subject>Social Sciences ; Social Theory</subject><ispartof>Sociologija, 2017, Vol.59 (2), p.139-155</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2017_33177.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prodanović, Srđan</creatorcontrib><title>Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira</title><title>Sociologija</title><addtitle>Sociology</addtitle><description>In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology – and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense putforward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character.</description><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Theory</subject><issn>0038-0318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFybsKwjAUgOEMCtbLGzjkBQopaSCOIl5GB_dyqKmcJM2BpMnQp7eDu9MH_79ilRBS10I2esO2KVkh2kaddMXOT5pM6NGC5_M7QqEIcx6TM9xFnHAx8zsNIwQqZHmiHsnTBy1ycgUj7Nl6AJ_M4eeOHW_X1-VR98aQ7yzlGJbeqVYpKeWf_QVyfzVU</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Prodanović, Srđan</creator><general>Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia</general><general>Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira</title><author>Prodanović, Srđan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_5455333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>srp</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prodanović, Srđan</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Sociologija</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prodanović, Srđan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira</atitle><jtitle>Sociologija</jtitle><addtitle>Sociology</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>139-155</pages><issn>0038-0318</issn><abstract>In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology – and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense putforward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character.</abstract><pub>Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia</pub><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0318 |
ispartof | Sociologija, 2017, Vol.59 (2), p.139-155 |
issn | 0038-0318 |
language | srp |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_545533 |
source | Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | Social Sciences Social Theory |
title | Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike u Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potencijal%20zdravorazumske%20kritike%20u%20Gofmanovoj%20sociologiji%20okvira&rft.jtitle=Sociologija&rft.au=Prodanovi%C4%87,%20Sr%C4%91an&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=139-155&rft.issn=0038-0318&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E545533%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=545533&rfr_iscdi=true |