Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate

Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate

In this study there are analyzed the categories of administrative acts on which there were controversies about the exercise of judicial control of these acts by means of a plea of illegality regulated by Article 4 of the Law on administrative disputed claims No 554/2004, especially prior to the amen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dreptul (București) 2015 (11), p.147-159
1. Verfasser: Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura
Format: Artikel
Sprache:rum
Schlagworte:
Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 11
container_start_page 147
container_title Dreptul (București)
container_volume
creator Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura
description In this study there are analyzed the categories of administrative acts on which there were controversies about the exercise of judicial control of these acts by means of a plea of illegality regulated by Article 4 of the Law on administrative disputed claims No 554/2004, especially prior to the amendment and supplementation of this legal text by the Law No 76/2012 for the implementation of the new Civil Procedure Code. Likewise, it is emphasized the concern of the legislator to settle the doctrinal and jurisprudential controversies concerning the scope of the object covered by this plea, by the amendments and supplements brought by this latter normative act, but, nevertheless, it is not out of the question that some of these controversies will also continue in the new legislative context, until a stable case law in the matter is formed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_541434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>541434</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>541434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_5414343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjUFqwzAQRbVIoaHNDbqYCwTs2obs04YcIPswkcZhjCKZ0cjkJIGQC-VYlaH7_M2H-f_NX5hlXdWbddU23btZpTRURZvvrmhpbj-cbH4-mEGoJ2GNKAQeIQfyBDYGlTiRJAIXrQqHOX_eGYYsnEbJjkLhsZRH4YmDA7Q6s-guHDipoPJUXs1gjxbiiclq9kBXS2NhicERzHtn9Kyo9GneevSJVv_-Yb52v4ftfm2Joj8OMUso92PX1m3TNi_iP_fIWKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library - Law</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><creator>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</creatorcontrib><description>In this study there are analyzed the categories of administrative acts on which there were controversies about the exercise of judicial control of these acts by means of a plea of illegality regulated by Article 4 of the Law on administrative disputed claims No 554/2004, especially prior to the amendment and supplementation of this legal text by the Law No 76/2012 for the implementation of the new Civil Procedure Code. Likewise, it is emphasized the concern of the legislator to settle the doctrinal and jurisprudential controversies concerning the scope of the object covered by this plea, by the amendments and supplements brought by this latter normative act, but, nevertheless, it is not out of the question that some of these controversies will also continue in the new legislative context, until a stable case law in the matter is formed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-0435</identifier><language>rum</language><publisher>Union of Jurists of Romania</publisher><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Dreptul (București), 2015 (11), p.147-159</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate</title><title>Dreptul (București)</title><addtitle>Law review</addtitle><description>In this study there are analyzed the categories of administrative acts on which there were controversies about the exercise of judicial control of these acts by means of a plea of illegality regulated by Article 4 of the Law on administrative disputed claims No 554/2004, especially prior to the amendment and supplementation of this legal text by the Law No 76/2012 for the implementation of the new Civil Procedure Code. Likewise, it is emphasized the concern of the legislator to settle the doctrinal and jurisprudential controversies concerning the scope of the object covered by this plea, by the amendments and supplements brought by this latter normative act, but, nevertheless, it is not out of the question that some of these controversies will also continue in the new legislative context, until a stable case law in the matter is formed.</description><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><issn>1018-0435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjUFqwzAQRbVIoaHNDbqYCwTs2obs04YcIPswkcZhjCKZ0cjkJIGQC-VYlaH7_M2H-f_NX5hlXdWbddU23btZpTRURZvvrmhpbj-cbH4-mEGoJ2GNKAQeIQfyBDYGlTiRJAIXrQqHOX_eGYYsnEbJjkLhsZRH4YmDA7Q6s-guHDipoPJUXs1gjxbiiclq9kBXS2NhicERzHtn9Kyo9GneevSJVv_-Yb52v4ftfm2Joj8OMUso92PX1m3TNi_iP_fIWKQ</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</creator><general>Union of Jurists of Romania</general><general>Uniunea Juriștilor din România</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate</title><author>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_5414343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>rum</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dornean Păunescu, Raluca Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate</atitle><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle><addtitle>Law review</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><issue>11</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>147-159</pages><issn>1018-0435</issn><abstract>In this study there are analyzed the categories of administrative acts on which there were controversies about the exercise of judicial control of these acts by means of a plea of illegality regulated by Article 4 of the Law on administrative disputed claims No 554/2004, especially prior to the amendment and supplementation of this legal text by the Law No 76/2012 for the implementation of the new Civil Procedure Code. Likewise, it is emphasized the concern of the legislator to settle the doctrinal and jurisprudential controversies concerning the scope of the object covered by this plea, by the amendments and supplements brought by this latter normative act, but, nevertheless, it is not out of the question that some of these controversies will also continue in the new legislative context, until a stable case law in the matter is formed.</abstract><pub>Union of Jurists of Romania</pub><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-0435
ispartof Dreptul (București), 2015 (11), p.147-159
issn 1018-0435
language rum
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_541434
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library - Law; Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals
subjects Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
title Discuții referitoare la unele controverse doctrinare și jurisprudențiale privind actele administrative care fac obiectul excepției de nelegalitate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discu%C8%9Bii%20referitoare%20la%20unele%20controverse%20doctrinare%20%C8%99i%20jurispruden%C8%9Biale%20privind%20actele%20administrative%20care%20fac%20obiectul%20excep%C8%9Biei%20de%20nelegalitate&rft.jtitle=Dreptul%20(Bucure%C8%99ti)&rft.au=Dornean%20P%C4%83unescu,%20Raluca%20Laura&rft.date=2015&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=147-159&rft.issn=1018-0435&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E541434%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=541434&rfr_iscdi=true