Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme
There have been different arguments on explaining the main reason of economic development differences among countries. This article examines four different hypotheses that try to explain the origins of economic development. These hypotheses are: (a) geography, (b) religion-culture, (c) institutions...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal 2016, Vol.7 (13), p.341-362 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | tur |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 362 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 341 |
| container_title | Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Gür, Nurullah |
| description | There have been different arguments on explaining the main reason of economic development differences among countries. This article examines four different hypotheses that try to explain the origins of economic development. These hypotheses are: (a) geography, (b) religion-culture, (c) institutions and (d) trust. After examining theoretical and empirical studies, it has been seen that researchers that put forth the importance of institutions and trust have revealed more reasonable theses because they analyze economic development in a more dynamic process. On the other hand, geography and religion-culture hypotheses have made more determinist explanations on the origins of economic development. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_496559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>496559</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>496559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547-71543383e94339db3629a3db001ea2bd2d241a9048d8207363505868d43b16e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzUFKAzEUxvEgCg61N3CRCwy85CWZPFxpqVUsuOm-zEyekE4mAzO48SxCr-DKC7TeywFdfPx23_9CFFoZKkmhuxSFQqDSaE_XYjlNBwDQZBUBFeJu3Q156GMnN5ziz7Gfl-L5GLN8OX13nBOPUZ4-P2Yyy4c4yvNXbjlxzzfi6q1OEy__XYjd43q3eiq3r5vn1f22bK2pykpZg-iRaYZCg05TjaEBUFzrJuigjaoJjA9eQ4UOLVjvfDDYKMceF-L277ZlHtL-MLyPec7tDTlrCX8BxzVElQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Gür, Nurullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Gür, Nurullah</creatorcontrib><description>There have been different arguments on explaining the main reason of economic development differences among countries. This article examines four different hypotheses that try to explain the origins of economic development. These hypotheses are: (a) geography, (b) religion-culture, (c) institutions and (d) trust. After examining theoretical and empirical studies, it has been seen that researchers that put forth the importance of institutions and trust have revealed more reasonable theses because they analyze economic development in a more dynamic process. On the other hand, geography and religion-culture hypotheses have made more determinist explanations on the origins of economic development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1309-4289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-9136</identifier><language>tur</language><publisher>Kafkas Üniversitesi Sağlık, Kültür ve Spor Daire Başkanlığı Dijital Baskı Merkezi</publisher><subject>Business Economy / Management ; Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology ; Economic development ; Review</subject><ispartof>Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal, 2016, Vol.7 (13), p.341-362</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2016_30457.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,21361</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gür, Nurullah</creatorcontrib><title>Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><title>Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal</title><addtitle>Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty</addtitle><description>There have been different arguments on explaining the main reason of economic development differences among countries. This article examines four different hypotheses that try to explain the origins of economic development. These hypotheses are: (a) geography, (b) religion-culture, (c) institutions and (d) trust. After examining theoretical and empirical studies, it has been seen that researchers that put forth the importance of institutions and trust have revealed more reasonable theses because they analyze economic development in a more dynamic process. On the other hand, geography and religion-culture hypotheses have made more determinist explanations on the origins of economic development.</description><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>1309-4289</issn><issn>2149-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNotzUFKAzEUxvEgCg61N3CRCwy85CWZPFxpqVUsuOm-zEyekE4mAzO48SxCr-DKC7TeywFdfPx23_9CFFoZKkmhuxSFQqDSaE_XYjlNBwDQZBUBFeJu3Q156GMnN5ziz7Gfl-L5GLN8OX13nBOPUZ4-P2Yyy4c4yvNXbjlxzzfi6q1OEy__XYjd43q3eiq3r5vn1f22bK2pykpZg-iRaYZCg05TjaEBUFzrJuigjaoJjA9eQ4UOLVjvfDDYKMceF-L277ZlHtL-MLyPec7tDTlrCX8BxzVElQ</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Gür, Nurullah</creator><general>Kafkas Üniversitesi Sağlık, Kültür ve Spor Daire Başkanlığı Dijital Baskı Merkezi</general><general>Kafkas University Department of Health, Culture and Sports Digital Printing Center</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</title><author>Gür, Nurullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547-71543383e94339db3629a3db001ea2bd2d241a9048d8207363505868d43b16e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>tur</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gür, Nurullah</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gür, Nurullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme</atitle><jtitle>Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>341-362</pages><issn>1309-4289</issn><eissn>2149-9136</eissn><abstract>There have been different arguments on explaining the main reason of economic development differences among countries. This article examines four different hypotheses that try to explain the origins of economic development. These hypotheses are: (a) geography, (b) religion-culture, (c) institutions and (d) trust. After examining theoretical and empirical studies, it has been seen that researchers that put forth the importance of institutions and trust have revealed more reasonable theses because they analyze economic development in a more dynamic process. On the other hand, geography and religion-culture hypotheses have made more determinist explanations on the origins of economic development.</abstract><pub>Kafkas Üniversitesi Sağlık, Kültür ve Spor Daire Başkanlığı Dijital Baskı Merkezi</pub><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1309-4289 |
| ispartof | Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal, 2016, Vol.7 (13), p.341-362 |
| issn | 1309-4289 2149-9136 |
| language | tur |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_496559 |
| source | Central and Eastern European Online Library |
| subjects | Business Economy / Management Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology Economic development Review |
| title | Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Kökenleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ekonomik%20Geli%C5%9Fmi%C5%9Fli%C4%9Fin%20K%C3%B6kenleri%20%C3%9Czerine%20Bir%20%C4%B0nceleme&rft.jtitle=Kafkas%20University.%20Faculty%20of%20Economics%20and%20Administrative%20Sciences.%20Journal&rft.au=G%C3%BCr,%20Nurullah&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=341-362&rft.issn=1309-4289&rft.eissn=2149-9136&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E496559%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=496559&rfr_iscdi=true |