POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ

In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their desti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fiat Iustitia 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.91-98
1. Verfasser: Jucan, Codruta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 2
container_start_page 91
container_title Fiat Iustitia
container_volume 2
creator Jucan, Codruta
description In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their destination is not given by the building in this case, but by the fact that there is the right to practice and necessary equipment to make it a sanitary unity according to legal standards. Consequently, they are movable goods which became immovable through incorporation (as is the shop license to be a chemist’s shop - sanitary unity, given to the person because he possessed the quality of a chemist, and work authorization for the building as such), as well as goods, that is to say utensils and outfit, taken over at the moment of abusive nationalization.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_478502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>478502</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>478502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_4785023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy0TUxMDTlYOAtLs4yMDAwNrQwN7M05GTwDvAP9nTy9HFV8PQLcQ0KCHINOdIU5KngCBRxDArxdPb3CfUJ9VQwU3Dx9FPwcXV3dVQwNFDQVzAyMDDUUwgOCXXxDFVwcVVwdoziYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eusmpqfk58Vn5pUV5QPF4E3MLUwMjYwLSAC4lMEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Jucan, Codruta</creator><creatorcontrib>Jucan, Codruta</creatorcontrib><description>In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their destination is not given by the building in this case, but by the fact that there is the right to practice and necessary equipment to make it a sanitary unity according to legal standards. Consequently, they are movable goods which became immovable through incorporation (as is the shop license to be a chemist’s shop - sanitary unity, given to the person because he possessed the quality of a chemist, and work authorization for the building as such), as well as goods, that is to say utensils and outfit, taken over at the moment of abusive nationalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1224-4015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law Cluj-Napoca</publisher><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Fiat Iustitia, 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.91-98</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,21342</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jucan, Codruta</creatorcontrib><title>POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ</title><title>Fiat Iustitia</title><addtitle>Fiat Iustitia</addtitle><description>In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their destination is not given by the building in this case, but by the fact that there is the right to practice and necessary equipment to make it a sanitary unity according to legal standards. Consequently, they are movable goods which became immovable through incorporation (as is the shop license to be a chemist’s shop - sanitary unity, given to the person because he possessed the quality of a chemist, and work authorization for the building as such), as well as goods, that is to say utensils and outfit, taken over at the moment of abusive nationalization.</description><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><issn>1224-4015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy0TUxMDTlYOAtLs4yMDAwNrQwN7M05GTwDvAP9nTy9HFV8PQLcQ0KCHINOdIU5KngCBRxDArxdPb3CfUJ9VQwU3Dx9FPwcXV3dVQwNFDQVzAyMDDUUwgOCXXxDFVwcVVwdoziYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eusmpqfk58Vn5pUV5QPF4E3MLUwMjYwLSAC4lMEo</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Jucan, Codruta</creator><general>"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law Cluj-Napoca</general><general>Facultatea de Drept Cluj Napoca, Universitatea Creştina "Dimitrie Cantemir" Bucureşti</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ</title><author>Jucan, Codruta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_4785023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jucan, Codruta</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Fiat Iustitia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jucan, Codruta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ</atitle><jtitle>Fiat Iustitia</jtitle><addtitle>Fiat Iustitia</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>91-98</pages><issn>1224-4015</issn><abstract>In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their destination is not given by the building in this case, but by the fact that there is the right to practice and necessary equipment to make it a sanitary unity according to legal standards. Consequently, they are movable goods which became immovable through incorporation (as is the shop license to be a chemist’s shop - sanitary unity, given to the person because he possessed the quality of a chemist, and work authorization for the building as such), as well as goods, that is to say utensils and outfit, taken over at the moment of abusive nationalization.</abstract><pub>"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law Cluj-Napoca</pub><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1224-4015
ispartof Fiat Iustitia, 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.91-98
issn 1224-4015
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_478502
source Central and Eastern European Online Library
subjects Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
title POSIBILE INTERPRETĂRI ALE ARTICOLULUI 6 DIN LEGEA 10 / 2001. STUDIU DE CAZ
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=POSIBILE%20INTERPRET%C4%82RI%20ALE%20ARTICOLULUI%206%20DIN%20LEGEA%2010%20/%202001.%20STUDIU%20DE%20CAZ&rft.jtitle=Fiat%20Iustitia&rft.au=Jucan,%20Codruta&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=91-98&rft.issn=1224-4015&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E478502%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=478502&rfr_iscdi=true