Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele
In the 1680s and 1690s numerous discussions and debates were held on the Estonian literary language. On the basis of critical writings on the religious books in Estonian, as well as of grammars and correspondence, the paper gives an overview of the arguments used in those discussions. The main topic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Linguistica Uralica 2011, Vol.XLVII (2), p.130-143 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Linguistica Uralica |
container_volume | XLVII |
creator | Tafenau, Kai |
description | In the 1680s and 1690s numerous discussions and debates were held on the Estonian literary language. On the basis of critical writings on the religious books in Estonian, as well as of grammars and correspondence, the paper gives an overview of the arguments used in those discussions. The main topics included the nature or the genius of Estonian, Estonian dialects, whether the peasant’s language or the language used in the previously printed books should be used, and whether Estonian should be modeled on German or Finnish. In the second part of the paper examples are given of the linguistic phenomena discussed in connection with the idea of the genius of the Estonian language. For the most part these are the aspects of Estonian that are difficult for German native speakers (e.g. negation, use of infinitives). It turns out that a number of topical issues discussed at the end of the 17th century had already been on the agenda for several decades. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_277582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>277582</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>277582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_2775823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi0sOgkAQRCdGE_FzAxd9AcwgyBB3fuNe9waxkUYczPQQE8_jMdx5McfEvatKvVfVEl6gwthXUxm3hSeTOPEjFQZd0WMupYxkpCJP2BXxpWGmWqOG9-uIBk6EgGw1cVYg7LLCUG75ZtJvJQ0nt3nckax7bN_PKrfoGEOgxlCmhSka7SaWZzA35-aK2nmHYIHEN8IKB6KTpxXj8Jd9Mdqs98utnyHW1aGsG6MdP0yUmiaT8I_-APy0Sjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tafenau, Kai</creator><creatorcontrib>Tafenau, Kai</creatorcontrib><description>In the 1680s and 1690s numerous discussions and debates were held on the Estonian literary language. On the basis of critical writings on the religious books in Estonian, as well as of grammars and correspondence, the paper gives an overview of the arguments used in those discussions. The main topics included the nature or the genius of Estonian, Estonian dialects, whether the peasant’s language or the language used in the previously printed books should be used, and whether Estonian should be modeled on German or Finnish. In the second part of the paper examples are given of the linguistic phenomena discussed in connection with the idea of the genius of the Estonian language. For the most part these are the aspects of Estonian that are difficult for German native speakers (e.g. negation, use of infinitives). It turns out that a number of topical issues discussed at the end of the 17th century had already been on the agenda for several decades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0868-4731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1736-7506</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus</publisher><subject>Language and Literature Studies</subject><ispartof>Linguistica Uralica, 2011, Vol.XLVII (2), p.130-143</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tafenau, Kai</creatorcontrib><title>Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele</title><title>Linguistica Uralica</title><addtitle>Linguistica Uralica</addtitle><description>In the 1680s and 1690s numerous discussions and debates were held on the Estonian literary language. On the basis of critical writings on the religious books in Estonian, as well as of grammars and correspondence, the paper gives an overview of the arguments used in those discussions. The main topics included the nature or the genius of Estonian, Estonian dialects, whether the peasant’s language or the language used in the previously printed books should be used, and whether Estonian should be modeled on German or Finnish. In the second part of the paper examples are given of the linguistic phenomena discussed in connection with the idea of the genius of the Estonian language. For the most part these are the aspects of Estonian that are difficult for German native speakers (e.g. negation, use of infinitives). It turns out that a number of topical issues discussed at the end of the 17th century had already been on the agenda for several decades.</description><subject>Language and Literature Studies</subject><issn>0868-4731</issn><issn>1736-7506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFi0sOgkAQRCdGE_FzAxd9AcwgyBB3fuNe9waxkUYczPQQE8_jMdx5McfEvatKvVfVEl6gwthXUxm3hSeTOPEjFQZd0WMupYxkpCJP2BXxpWGmWqOG9-uIBk6EgGw1cVYg7LLCUG75ZtJvJQ0nt3nckax7bN_PKrfoGEOgxlCmhSka7SaWZzA35-aK2nmHYIHEN8IKB6KTpxXj8Jd9Mdqs98utnyHW1aGsG6MdP0yUmiaT8I_-APy0Sjc</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Tafenau, Kai</creator><general>Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus</general><general>Estonian Academy Publishers</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele</title><author>Tafenau, Kai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_2775823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Language and Literature Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tafenau, Kai</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Linguistica Uralica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tafenau, Kai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele</atitle><jtitle>Linguistica Uralica</jtitle><addtitle>Linguistica Uralica</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>XLVII</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>130-143</pages><issn>0868-4731</issn><eissn>1736-7506</eissn><abstract>In the 1680s and 1690s numerous discussions and debates were held on the Estonian literary language. On the basis of critical writings on the religious books in Estonian, as well as of grammars and correspondence, the paper gives an overview of the arguments used in those discussions. The main topics included the nature or the genius of Estonian, Estonian dialects, whether the peasant’s language or the language used in the previously printed books should be used, and whether Estonian should be modeled on German or Finnish. In the second part of the paper examples are given of the linguistic phenomena discussed in connection with the idea of the genius of the Estonian language. For the most part these are the aspects of Estonian that are difficult for German native speakers (e.g. negation, use of infinitives). It turns out that a number of topical issues discussed at the end of the 17th century had already been on the agenda for several decades.</abstract><pub>Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus</pub><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0868-4731 |
ispartof | Linguistica Uralica, 2011, Vol.XLVII (2), p.130-143 |
issn | 0868-4731 1736-7506 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_277582 |
source | Electronic Journals Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Language and Literature Studies |
title | Diskussionen über die estnische Schriftsprache in der zweiten Hälfte des 17. jahrhunderts: Argumente und Beispiele |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A22%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diskussionen%20%C3%BCber%20die%20estnische%20Schriftsprache%20in%20der%20zweiten%20H%C3%A4lfte%20des%2017.%20jahrhunderts:%20Argumente%20und%20Beispiele&rft.jtitle=Linguistica%20Uralica&rft.au=Tafenau,%20Kai&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=XLVII&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=130-143&rft.issn=0868-4731&rft.eissn=1736-7506&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E277582%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=277582&rfr_iscdi=true |