CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers

Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bratislava law review (Online) 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240
1. Verfasser: Zigo, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Bratislava law review (Online)
container_volume 7
creator Zigo, Daniel
description Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.
doi_str_mv 10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1251181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1251181</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1251181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp_gAshS13MNLnJJBl3daiPUhGsRXATMp2bMqXtyKRT9N-b1q7ug3sO93yEXHOWSgUGhuW6TYGBSHUKqYbsjPRASZkokeXnsRcmSzQz5pIMQlgxxiDjPM94j3wVk_H8nn6-Uret6KzZ1xs6G9F9SqfdD27KpmuX9KEL9RZDoO-4rMMO20BvJ01cVbRwAQMtEqGHwI4eRaIYj8PdFbnwbh1wcKp9Mn8cfxTPyfTt6aUYTZMF8HyXeIVOC685Kik8z40Er7GS3htlvALuFGPSc2mwErgQUAI6pytTiRIPofuE__su2iaEFr39buuNa38tZ_bIx0Y-9nBqtQUb-UTNzUmD2KztKsbcxh8tP4AxXPwBFYJevw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zigo, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2385-7088</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2585-7088</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2644-6359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</publisher><subject>Commercial Law ; Court case ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Bratislava law review (Online), 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_82846.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</title><title>Bratislava law review (Online)</title><addtitle>Bratislava Law Review</addtitle><description>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</description><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Court case</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><issn>2385-7088</issn><issn>2585-7088</issn><issn>2644-6359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp_gAshS13MNLnJJBl3daiPUhGsRXATMp2bMqXtyKRT9N-b1q7ug3sO93yEXHOWSgUGhuW6TYGBSHUKqYbsjPRASZkokeXnsRcmSzQz5pIMQlgxxiDjPM94j3wVk_H8nn6-Uret6KzZ1xs6G9F9SqfdD27KpmuX9KEL9RZDoO-4rMMO20BvJ01cVbRwAQMtEqGHwI4eRaIYj8PdFbnwbh1wcKp9Mn8cfxTPyfTt6aUYTZMF8HyXeIVOC685Kik8z40Er7GS3htlvALuFGPSc2mwErgQUAI6pytTiRIPofuE__su2iaEFr39buuNa38tZ_bIx0Y-9nBqtQUb-UTNzUmD2KztKsbcxh8tP4AxXPwBFYJevw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Zigo, Daniel</creator><general>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</general><general>Comenius University in Bratislava</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20)</title><author>Zigo, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Court case</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bratislava law review (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zigo, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</atitle><jtitle>Bratislava law review (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Bratislava Law Review</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>227-240</pages><issn>2385-7088</issn><issn>2585-7088</issn><eissn>2644-6359</eissn><abstract>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</abstract><pub>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</pub><doi>10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2385-7088
ispartof Bratislava law review (Online), 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240
issn 2385-7088
2585-7088
2644-6359
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_1251181
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Commercial Law
Court case
Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
title CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A16%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CJEU:%20WM%20and%20Sovim%20SA%20v.%20Luxembourg%20Business%20Registers%20(Joined%20Cases%20C-37/20%20and%20C-601/20):%20Rethinking%20Transparency%20of%20Ultimate%20Beneficial%20Owners%20Registers&rft.jtitle=Bratislava%20law%20review%20(Online)&rft.au=Zigo,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=227-240&rft.issn=2385-7088&rft.eissn=2644-6359&rft_id=info:doi/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E1251181%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1251181&rfr_iscdi=true