CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers
Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bratislava law review (Online) 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Bratislava law review (Online) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Zigo, Daniel |
description | Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU. |
doi_str_mv | 10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1251181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1251181</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1251181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp_gAshS13MNLnJJBl3daiPUhGsRXATMp2bMqXtyKRT9N-b1q7ug3sO93yEXHOWSgUGhuW6TYGBSHUKqYbsjPRASZkokeXnsRcmSzQz5pIMQlgxxiDjPM94j3wVk_H8nn6-Uret6KzZ1xs6G9F9SqfdD27KpmuX9KEL9RZDoO-4rMMO20BvJ01cVbRwAQMtEqGHwI4eRaIYj8PdFbnwbh1wcKp9Mn8cfxTPyfTt6aUYTZMF8HyXeIVOC685Kik8z40Er7GS3htlvALuFGPSc2mwErgQUAI6pytTiRIPofuE__su2iaEFr39buuNa38tZ_bIx0Y-9nBqtQUb-UTNzUmD2KztKsbcxh8tP4AxXPwBFYJevw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zigo, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2385-7088</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2585-7088</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2644-6359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</publisher><subject>Commercial Law ; Court case ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Bratislava law review (Online), 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_82846.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</title><title>Bratislava law review (Online)</title><addtitle>Bratislava Law Review</addtitle><description>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</description><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Court case</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><issn>2385-7088</issn><issn>2585-7088</issn><issn>2644-6359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp_gAshS13MNLnJJBl3daiPUhGsRXATMp2bMqXtyKRT9N-b1q7ug3sO93yEXHOWSgUGhuW6TYGBSHUKqYbsjPRASZkokeXnsRcmSzQz5pIMQlgxxiDjPM94j3wVk_H8nn6-Uret6KzZ1xs6G9F9SqfdD27KpmuX9KEL9RZDoO-4rMMO20BvJ01cVbRwAQMtEqGHwI4eRaIYj8PdFbnwbh1wcKp9Mn8cfxTPyfTt6aUYTZMF8HyXeIVOC685Kik8z40Er7GS3htlvALuFGPSc2mwErgQUAI6pytTiRIPofuE__su2iaEFr39buuNa38tZ_bIx0Y-9nBqtQUb-UTNzUmD2KztKsbcxh8tP4AxXPwBFYJevw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Zigo, Daniel</creator><general>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</general><general>Comenius University in Bratislava</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20)</title><author>Zigo, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f6ea73f71e643f19842f7ed4ff868f621a6004f148ed3ec32b2eaa7d8d3be2023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Court case</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zigo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bratislava law review (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zigo, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers</atitle><jtitle>Bratislava law review (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Bratislava Law Review</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>227-240</pages><issn>2385-7088</issn><issn>2585-7088</issn><eissn>2644-6359</eissn><abstract>Rules against money laundering and terrorist financing are an area of law in which the European Union is significantly active and introduces many innovations. Public registers of beneficial ownership were one of the crucial tools with which this legislation promoted the openness of corporate structures in the European environment. For this reason, the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers, which cancelled public access to beneficial ownership registers, caused an immense response. Part of the public sees this step as a major blow to the transparency and part as a victory for the rights of individuals. This paper explains the factual situation in the given case, summarises the Advocate General's opinion and analyses the reasons that led the Court to the presented conclusions. The author also reflects on the jurisprudence of the Court, which led to the issuance of this decision and its importance in the field of AML and the protection of the right to privacy in general. Based on these facts, the conclusion presents the possible development of future beneficial ownership registers in the EU.</abstract><pub>Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave</pub><doi>10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-3471</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2385-7088 |
ispartof | Bratislava law review (Online), 2023-01, Vol.7 (2), p.227-240 |
issn | 2385-7088 2585-7088 2644-6359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_1251181 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Commercial Law Court case Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |
title | CJEU: WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers (Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20): Rethinking Transparency of Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A16%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CJEU:%20WM%20and%20Sovim%20SA%20v.%20Luxembourg%20Business%20Registers%20(Joined%20Cases%20C-37/20%20and%20C-601/20):%20Rethinking%20Transparency%20of%20Ultimate%20Beneficial%20Owners%20Registers&rft.jtitle=Bratislava%20law%20review%20(Online)&rft.au=Zigo,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=227-240&rft.issn=2385-7088&rft.eissn=2644-6359&rft_id=info:doi/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.725&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E1251181%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1251181&rfr_iscdi=true |