KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA
The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studia Iuridica (Warszawa) 2022 (95), p.223-240 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | pol |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 240 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 95 |
| container_start_page | 223 |
| container_title | Studia Iuridica (Warszawa) |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Jakubowski, Daniel |
| description | The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1176725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1176725</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1176725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_11767253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjUx0TU2NDZlYeA0MDQ21zUxNjHjYOAqLs4yMDAzN7M04WTQ9g6KDHEN8nRUcHF18_TzdI708nNVCHI8uvtIi7Oru7-Cn6eri5OjT3BIuCMPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQdXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDiscbGpqbmRuZGhOSBwCt-Sup</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Jakubowski, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakubowski, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0137-4346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2544-3135</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>University of Warsaw Press</publisher><subject>Court case</subject><ispartof>Studia Iuridica (Warszawa), 2022 (95), p.223-240</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2022_78013.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21341</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakubowski, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA</title><title>Studia Iuridica (Warszawa)</title><addtitle>Studia Iuridica</addtitle><description>The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments.</description><subject>Court case</subject><issn>0137-4346</issn><issn>2544-3135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjUx0TU2NDZlYeA0MDQ21zUxNjHjYOAqLs4yMDAzN7M04WTQ9g6KDHEN8nRUcHF18_TzdI708nNVCHI8uvtIi7Oru7-Cn6eri5OjT3BIuCMPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQdXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDiscbGpqbmRuZGhOSBwCt-Sup</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Jakubowski, Daniel</creator><general>University of Warsaw Press</general><general>Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA</title><author>Jakubowski, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_11767253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Court case</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakubowski, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Studia Iuridica (Warszawa)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakubowski, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA</atitle><jtitle>Studia Iuridica (Warszawa)</jtitle><addtitle>Studia Iuridica</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issue>95</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>223-240</pages><issn>0137-4346</issn><eissn>2544-3135</eissn><abstract>The article discusses the results of a study on the judgments in which the courts ruled on the issue of gross negligence. The main goal is to identify the criteria the courts adopt for defining gross negligence. Using qualitative analysis the author classifies the criteria into categories and points to the differences between them, while performing quantitative analysis indicates the frequency of particular criteria usage in practice and analyzes statistical relationship between the categories and the criteria. In addition to the conclusions concerning the concept of gross negligence, the author offers critical comments on the formulation of justifications for judgments.</abstract><pub>University of Warsaw Press</pub><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0137-4346 |
| ispartof | Studia Iuridica (Warszawa), 2022 (95), p.223-240 |
| issn | 0137-4346 2544-3135 |
| language | pol |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_1176725 |
| source | Central and Eastern European Online Library |
| subjects | Court case |
| title | KRYTERIA DEFINICYJNE RAŻĄCEGO NIEDBALSTWA |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A23%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=KRYTERIA%20DEFINICYJNE%20RA%C5%BB%C4%84CEGO%20NIEDBALSTWA&rft.jtitle=Studia%20Iuridica%20(Warszawa)&rft.au=Jakubowski,%20Daniel&rft.date=2022&rft.issue=95&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=223-240&rft.issn=0137-4346&rft.eissn=2544-3135&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E1176725%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1176725&rfr_iscdi=true |