Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?

The article analyzes the grounds on which archaeologists draw conclusions about the connection of certain finds with Slavic paganism. It is demonstrated that the conclusions of archaeologists are directly influenced by their ideas about paganism, which are hypothetical in nature and can easily be qu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stratum 2022 (5), p.345-359
1. Verfasser: Beskov, Andrey A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:rus
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 5
container_start_page 345
container_title Stratum
container_volume
creator Beskov, Andrey A
description The article analyzes the grounds on which archaeologists draw conclusions about the connection of certain finds with Slavic paganism. It is demonstrated that the conclusions of archaeologists are directly influenced by their ideas about paganism, which are hypothetical in nature and can easily be questioned. As a result, interpretations of archaeological finds turn out to be very subjective. A large number of dubious guesses blur the line between scientific and non-scientific views on Slavic paganism. The author believes that subjectivism cannot be excluded from historical science, but there is a way to reduce its influence on the formation of a scientific picture of Slavic paganism. When creating reconstructions of Slavic paganism, archaeological materials should be taken into account, but archaeologists should not take into account such reconstructions when interpreting archaeological finds.
doi_str_mv 10.55086/sp225345360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1075311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1075311</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1075311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c92t-7e30dfd7d159906fa1e42b5d14edb1af9f99bdd00e4dac153b44199613d186223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTU1LA0EMHUTBUnvzKuwPcDWZmezunESKX1Dw0nvZ7cweSrHi6t36cfFSEI_-iFJpraj1L8z-I1O3BwnJe0leXoTYRtgjgiTaLy6lJKVJRbAmaphQHCpSap15BElogOJN0SiKHgAgStJkauLFv_p5-eAX_pPzjfloN_AT5ovytrz3Mz_13xzjchT8SX6Y3jF-sGzOk3ngn7l9919cZ0tlUE3HfP_I1_-cg3LI1tPlonxiHLJTVSerN0vh4mBLbORpv3CNFdZF-_io3TwNW-cnZ83DVtg18jqMnQKb29giGQNRnqLTMiOL2tkM09zkxmTWAjht0y6SyrRGYyJUFpNISlUXO5Vt17lBv9Mb3Fxd8LsOQkwKUf0CmpOZHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</source><creator>Beskov, Andrey A</creator><creatorcontrib>Beskov, Andrey A</creatorcontrib><description>The article analyzes the grounds on which archaeologists draw conclusions about the connection of certain finds with Slavic paganism. It is demonstrated that the conclusions of archaeologists are directly influenced by their ideas about paganism, which are hypothetical in nature and can easily be questioned. As a result, interpretations of archaeological finds turn out to be very subjective. A large number of dubious guesses blur the line between scientific and non-scientific views on Slavic paganism. The author believes that subjectivism cannot be excluded from historical science, but there is a way to reduce its influence on the formation of a scientific picture of Slavic paganism. When creating reconstructions of Slavic paganism, archaeological materials should be taken into account, but archaeologists should not take into account such reconstructions when interpreting archaeological finds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1608-9057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1857-3533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.55086/sp225345360</identifier><language>rus</language><publisher>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; History ; History of Religion</subject><ispartof>Stratum, 2022 (5), p.345-359</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2022_70155.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,21362,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beskov, Andrey A</creatorcontrib><title>Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?</title><title>Stratum</title><addtitle>Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology</addtitle><description>The article analyzes the grounds on which archaeologists draw conclusions about the connection of certain finds with Slavic paganism. It is demonstrated that the conclusions of archaeologists are directly influenced by their ideas about paganism, which are hypothetical in nature and can easily be questioned. As a result, interpretations of archaeological finds turn out to be very subjective. A large number of dubious guesses blur the line between scientific and non-scientific views on Slavic paganism. The author believes that subjectivism cannot be excluded from historical science, but there is a way to reduce its influence on the formation of a scientific picture of Slavic paganism. When creating reconstructions of Slavic paganism, archaeological materials should be taken into account, but archaeologists should not take into account such reconstructions when interpreting archaeological finds.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of Religion</subject><issn>1608-9057</issn><issn>1857-3533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpNTU1LA0EMHUTBUnvzKuwPcDWZmezunESKX1Dw0nvZ7cweSrHi6t36cfFSEI_-iFJpraj1L8z-I1O3BwnJe0leXoTYRtgjgiTaLy6lJKVJRbAmaphQHCpSap15BElogOJN0SiKHgAgStJkauLFv_p5-eAX_pPzjfloN_AT5ovytrz3Mz_13xzjchT8SX6Y3jF-sGzOk3ngn7l9919cZ0tlUE3HfP_I1_-cg3LI1tPlonxiHLJTVSerN0vh4mBLbORpv3CNFdZF-_io3TwNW-cnZ83DVtg18jqMnQKb29giGQNRnqLTMiOL2tkM09zkxmTWAjht0y6SyrRGYyJUFpNISlUXO5Vt17lBv9Mb3Fxd8LsOQkwKUf0CmpOZHQ</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Beskov, Andrey A</creator><general>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</general><general>Издательский дом Stratum, Университет «Высшая антропологическая школа</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?</title><author>Beskov, Andrey A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c92t-7e30dfd7d159906fa1e42b5d14edb1af9f99bdd00e4dac153b44199613d186223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>rus</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beskov, Andrey A</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beskov, Andrey A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?</atitle><jtitle>Stratum</jtitle><addtitle>Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issue>5</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>345-359</pages><issn>1608-9057</issn><eissn>1857-3533</eissn><abstract>The article analyzes the grounds on which archaeologists draw conclusions about the connection of certain finds with Slavic paganism. It is demonstrated that the conclusions of archaeologists are directly influenced by their ideas about paganism, which are hypothetical in nature and can easily be questioned. As a result, interpretations of archaeological finds turn out to be very subjective. A large number of dubious guesses blur the line between scientific and non-scientific views on Slavic paganism. The author believes that subjectivism cannot be excluded from historical science, but there is a way to reduce its influence on the formation of a scientific picture of Slavic paganism. When creating reconstructions of Slavic paganism, archaeological materials should be taken into account, but archaeologists should not take into account such reconstructions when interpreting archaeological finds.</abstract><pub>Stratum Publishing House, High Anthropological School University</pub><doi>10.55086/sp225345360</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1608-9057
ispartof Stratum, 2022 (5), p.345-359
issn 1608-9057
1857-3533
language rus
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_1075311
source Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals
subjects Archaeology
History
History of Religion
title Мифология, вооруженная лопатой, или Возможна ли археология сверхъестественного?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A57%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F,%20%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B9,%20%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%20%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%BB%D0%B8%20%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%85%D1%8A%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE?&rft.jtitle=Stratum&rft.au=Beskov,%20Andrey%20A&rft.date=2022&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=345-359&rft.issn=1608-9057&rft.eissn=1857-3533&rft_id=info:doi/10.55086/sp225345360&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E1075311%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1075311&rfr_iscdi=true