Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

For athletes to perform high-intensity movements with high quality, anaerobic endurance must be developed in order to repeat these movements one after the other with the same quality and without fatigue. Aerobic and anaerobic endurance characteristics should be followed by using tests suitable for t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi 2021, Vol.8 (2), p.268-280
Hauptverfasser: Uzun, Nurettin Ersin, Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba, Kızılet, Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:tur
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 2
container_start_page 268
container_title Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi
container_volume 8
creator Uzun, Nurettin Ersin
Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba
Kızılet, Ali
description For athletes to perform high-intensity movements with high quality, anaerobic endurance must be developed in order to repeat these movements one after the other with the same quality and without fatigue. Aerobic and anaerobic endurance characteristics should be followed by using tests suitable for the requirements and structure of the sports branch before and during the season. The aim of this study is to determine the maximal oxygen consumption (MaxVo2) with indirect MaxVo2 values obtained with the help of formulas from "Yo-yo Intermittent Recovery Test (level 1) (YATT1)" and "30- 15 Intermittent Endurance Test (30-15 IFT)". The purpose of this study is to compare the direct MaxVo2 value determined by using an oxygen analyzer in these tests and to examine the reliability of the formulas. The sample group of the study consists of 12 male athletes with an average age of 21.7 ± 1.2 who play futsal and badminton licensed in Marmara University Faculty of Sports Sciences. MaxVo2 values of the athletes were determined indirectly by putting the test result into the test formula, and directly by the oxygen analyzer on the athletes during the test. According to the results of the study, a correlation was determined between direct and indirect measurement methods according to the results of the correlation test of the data obtained from YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (respectively; 828**, p=0.001 and 816** p=0.001). According to the results of the co-sample t-test performed for the measurement methods themselves, a statistically significant difference was found between the two measurement methods (p= 0.002 and p=0.019, respectively). Finally, while there was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements of YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (p=.454), a statistically significant difference was found between indirect measurements (p=0.002). According to the results of the study, it is appropriate to use both direct and indirect measurement methods of YATT1 or 30-15 IFT tests, considering the sport-specific features, in determining MaxVo2.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1017664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1017664</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1017664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_10176643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjr9KA0EQxhdBMGgeQZhSi4Ndc4lJqcbTEMTCK0wVFjPCXOZ2w27uIJ2vYZVnSJ8u9w72Pom7h4Wdxfz7zTfDdyQ6VyodJiPZfz0RXe8LKWUgMh0NO-LrSS89lVUJz6EWaGCqV9rTGj0ZMnCLTI7RlHFeIEwrZm2aXUhw4zQ3u2UIGOtNpLGPCHL0a0YXTwzMbDKzf9W5XWkXPpS6FRJcvGBNGwR1CTVCTyaqD5Ms__74jB4y68rDntt_YXw47Gs0FH1Rs23RGJstRpsLcsTR65k4ftfssftbT8V5dp_fPSZviJbnha2cCXyupLoeDNLef_sfnb91rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin ; Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba ; Kızılet, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin ; Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba ; Kızılet, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>For athletes to perform high-intensity movements with high quality, anaerobic endurance must be developed in order to repeat these movements one after the other with the same quality and without fatigue. Aerobic and anaerobic endurance characteristics should be followed by using tests suitable for the requirements and structure of the sports branch before and during the season. The aim of this study is to determine the maximal oxygen consumption (MaxVo2) with indirect MaxVo2 values obtained with the help of formulas from "Yo-yo Intermittent Recovery Test (level 1) (YATT1)" and "30- 15 Intermittent Endurance Test (30-15 IFT)". The purpose of this study is to compare the direct MaxVo2 value determined by using an oxygen analyzer in these tests and to examine the reliability of the formulas. The sample group of the study consists of 12 male athletes with an average age of 21.7 ± 1.2 who play futsal and badminton licensed in Marmara University Faculty of Sports Sciences. MaxVo2 values of the athletes were determined indirectly by putting the test result into the test formula, and directly by the oxygen analyzer on the athletes during the test. According to the results of the study, a correlation was determined between direct and indirect measurement methods according to the results of the correlation test of the data obtained from YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (respectively; 828**, p=0.001 and 816** p=0.001). According to the results of the co-sample t-test performed for the measurement methods themselves, a statistically significant difference was found between the two measurement methods (p= 0.002 and p=0.019, respectively). Finally, while there was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements of YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (p=.454), a statistically significant difference was found between indirect measurements (p=0.002). According to the results of the study, it is appropriate to use both direct and indirect measurement methods of YATT1 or 30-15 IFT tests, considering the sport-specific features, in determining MaxVo2.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2148-905X</identifier><language>tur</language><publisher>Dumlupinar University - School of Physical Education and Sports</publisher><subject>Methodology and research technology ; Sports Studies</subject><ispartof>Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi, 2021, Vol.8 (2), p.268-280</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_65859.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kızılet, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi</title><title>Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi</title><addtitle>Sportive Sight: Journal of Sports and Education</addtitle><description>For athletes to perform high-intensity movements with high quality, anaerobic endurance must be developed in order to repeat these movements one after the other with the same quality and without fatigue. Aerobic and anaerobic endurance characteristics should be followed by using tests suitable for the requirements and structure of the sports branch before and during the season. The aim of this study is to determine the maximal oxygen consumption (MaxVo2) with indirect MaxVo2 values obtained with the help of formulas from "Yo-yo Intermittent Recovery Test (level 1) (YATT1)" and "30- 15 Intermittent Endurance Test (30-15 IFT)". The purpose of this study is to compare the direct MaxVo2 value determined by using an oxygen analyzer in these tests and to examine the reliability of the formulas. The sample group of the study consists of 12 male athletes with an average age of 21.7 ± 1.2 who play futsal and badminton licensed in Marmara University Faculty of Sports Sciences. MaxVo2 values of the athletes were determined indirectly by putting the test result into the test formula, and directly by the oxygen analyzer on the athletes during the test. According to the results of the study, a correlation was determined between direct and indirect measurement methods according to the results of the correlation test of the data obtained from YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (respectively; 828**, p=0.001 and 816** p=0.001). According to the results of the co-sample t-test performed for the measurement methods themselves, a statistically significant difference was found between the two measurement methods (p= 0.002 and p=0.019, respectively). Finally, while there was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements of YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (p=.454), a statistically significant difference was found between indirect measurements (p=0.002). According to the results of the study, it is appropriate to use both direct and indirect measurement methods of YATT1 or 30-15 IFT tests, considering the sport-specific features, in determining MaxVo2.</description><subject>Methodology and research technology</subject><subject>Sports Studies</subject><issn>2148-905X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjr9KA0EQxhdBMGgeQZhSi4Ndc4lJqcbTEMTCK0wVFjPCXOZ2w27uIJ2vYZVnSJ8u9w72Pom7h4Wdxfz7zTfDdyQ6VyodJiPZfz0RXe8LKWUgMh0NO-LrSS89lVUJz6EWaGCqV9rTGj0ZMnCLTI7RlHFeIEwrZm2aXUhw4zQ3u2UIGOtNpLGPCHL0a0YXTwzMbDKzf9W5XWkXPpS6FRJcvGBNGwR1CTVCTyaqD5Ms__74jB4y68rDntt_YXw47Gs0FH1Rs23RGJstRpsLcsTR65k4ftfssftbT8V5dp_fPSZviJbnha2cCXyupLoeDNLef_sfnb91rw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin</creator><creator>Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba</creator><creator>Kızılet, Ali</creator><general>Dumlupinar University - School of Physical Education and Sports</general><general>Dumlupınar Üniversitesi - Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi</title><author>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin ; Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba ; Kızılet, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_10176643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>tur</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Methodology and research technology</topic><topic>Sports Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kızılet, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uzun, Nurettin Ersin</au><au>Kizilet Bozdoğan, Tuba</au><au>Kızılet, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi</atitle><jtitle>Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi</jtitle><addtitle>Sportive Sight: Journal of Sports and Education</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>268-280</pages><eissn>2148-905X</eissn><abstract>For athletes to perform high-intensity movements with high quality, anaerobic endurance must be developed in order to repeat these movements one after the other with the same quality and without fatigue. Aerobic and anaerobic endurance characteristics should be followed by using tests suitable for the requirements and structure of the sports branch before and during the season. The aim of this study is to determine the maximal oxygen consumption (MaxVo2) with indirect MaxVo2 values obtained with the help of formulas from "Yo-yo Intermittent Recovery Test (level 1) (YATT1)" and "30- 15 Intermittent Endurance Test (30-15 IFT)". The purpose of this study is to compare the direct MaxVo2 value determined by using an oxygen analyzer in these tests and to examine the reliability of the formulas. The sample group of the study consists of 12 male athletes with an average age of 21.7 ± 1.2 who play futsal and badminton licensed in Marmara University Faculty of Sports Sciences. MaxVo2 values of the athletes were determined indirectly by putting the test result into the test formula, and directly by the oxygen analyzer on the athletes during the test. According to the results of the study, a correlation was determined between direct and indirect measurement methods according to the results of the correlation test of the data obtained from YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (respectively; 828**, p=0.001 and 816** p=0.001). According to the results of the co-sample t-test performed for the measurement methods themselves, a statistically significant difference was found between the two measurement methods (p= 0.002 and p=0.019, respectively). Finally, while there was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements of YATT1 and 30-15 IFT (p=.454), a statistically significant difference was found between indirect measurements (p=0.002). According to the results of the study, it is appropriate to use both direct and indirect measurement methods of YATT1 or 30-15 IFT tests, considering the sport-specific features, in determining MaxVo2.</abstract><pub>Dumlupinar University - School of Physical Education and Sports</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2148-905X
ispartof Sportif bakış spor ve eğitim bilimleri dergisi, 2021, Vol.8 (2), p.268-280
issn 2148-905X
language tur
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_1017664
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Methodology and research technology
Sports Studies
title Maksimum Oksijen Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kullanılan Aralıklı Dayanıklılık Testlerinden Yo-Yo Aralıklı Toparlanma Testi (Seviye 1) ve 30-15 IFT’nin Formüllerinin Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A09%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maksimum%20Oksijen%20Kapasitesinin%20Belirlenmesinde%20Kullan%C4%B1lan%20Aral%C4%B1kl%C4%B1%20Dayan%C4%B1kl%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20Testlerinden%20Yo-Yo%20Aral%C4%B1kl%C4%B1%20Toparlanma%20Testi%20(Seviye%201)%20ve%2030-15%20IFT%E2%80%99nin%20Form%C3%BCllerinin%20G%C3%BCvenilirli%C4%9Finin%20De%C4%9Ferlendirilmesi&rft.jtitle=Sportif%20bak%C4%B1%C5%9F%20spor%20ve%20e%C4%9Fitim%20bilimleri%20dergisi&rft.au=Uzun,%20Nurettin%20Ersin&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=268-280&rft.eissn=2148-905X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E1017664%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1017664&rfr_iscdi=true