The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability
Some features within the physical universe appear to be so well-ordered that they have been regarded as evidence of the existence of a supernatural being who has designed them. This history of the so-called design argument is millennia-long, and various formulations of the argument have been present...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studia philosophiae christianae 2020-09, Vol.56 (3), p.51-72 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng ; ger |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 72 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Studia philosophiae christianae |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Loikkanen, Juuso |
| description | Some features within the physical universe appear to be so well-ordered that they have been regarded as evidence of the existence of a supernatural being who has designed them. This history of the so-called design argument is millennia-long, and various formulations of the argument have been presented. In this paper, I explore one contemporary version of the design argument proposed by the Intelligent Design movement, and analyze its advantages and disadvantages in comparison to one of the most famous classical versions of the argument. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.03 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1017449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1017449</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_060f14105ade4d2285f44bf49bb7b5e8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1017449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1318-47e2ef37fa03d0c95d7e33eb7ccf74f6fd4a79e3853714f8cfe5da33e9a0db2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLxDAQhYMouOj-AUHoH2id3Jr2SUS8LCz4sj6HXCa1S9ssSRX231sv6LwMDOd8zDmEXFGoGK1bdZMP7q1iwKCSdcUr4CdkxRSDEiSnp2QFspGlFArOyTrnPSwjFa0ZXZHd7g0Lj7nvpsKk7n3EaS6yGT5Mh_62uMsZc-6nrpgXnYvTjOMhJpOO_-qQ4lj04yFFa2w_9PPxkpwFM2Rc_-4L8vr4sLt_LrcvT5v7u23pKKdNKRQyDFwFA9yDa6VXyDla5VxQItTBC6Na5I3kiorQuIDSm0XRGvCWWX5BNj9cH81eH1I_Lo_paHr9fYip0ybNvRtQQw2BCgrSeBSesUYGIWwQrbXKSmwWFvthuRRzThj-eBT0d836q2b9VbOWteYa-GK6_jUhxkHv43ualsCLhSohWv4J_2N84A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Loikkanen, Juuso</creator><creatorcontrib>Loikkanen, Juuso</creatorcontrib><description>Some features within the physical universe appear to be so well-ordered that they have been regarded as evidence of the existence of a supernatural being who has designed them. This history of the so-called design argument is millennia-long, and various formulations of the argument have been presented. In this paper, I explore one contemporary version of the design argument proposed by the Intelligent Design movement, and analyze its advantages and disadvantages in comparison to one of the most famous classical versions of the argument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0585-5470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2720-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.03</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie</publisher><subject>argument ; Christian Theology and Religion ; design ; intelligent design ; Metaphysics ; natural theology ; Philosophy of Religion</subject><ispartof>Studia philosophiae christianae, 2020-09, Vol.56 (3), p.51-72</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1318-47e2ef37fa03d0c95d7e33eb7ccf74f6fd4a79e3853714f8cfe5da33e9a0db2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5739-6729</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2020_65851.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loikkanen, Juuso</creatorcontrib><title>The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability</title><title>Studia philosophiae christianae</title><addtitle>Studies in Christian Philosophy</addtitle><description>Some features within the physical universe appear to be so well-ordered that they have been regarded as evidence of the existence of a supernatural being who has designed them. This history of the so-called design argument is millennia-long, and various formulations of the argument have been presented. In this paper, I explore one contemporary version of the design argument proposed by the Intelligent Design movement, and analyze its advantages and disadvantages in comparison to one of the most famous classical versions of the argument.</description><subject>argument</subject><subject>Christian Theology and Religion</subject><subject>design</subject><subject>intelligent design</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>natural theology</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><issn>0585-5470</issn><issn>2720-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkFtLxDAQhYMouOj-AUHoH2id3Jr2SUS8LCz4sj6HXCa1S9ssSRX231sv6LwMDOd8zDmEXFGoGK1bdZMP7q1iwKCSdcUr4CdkxRSDEiSnp2QFspGlFArOyTrnPSwjFa0ZXZHd7g0Lj7nvpsKk7n3EaS6yGT5Mh_62uMsZc-6nrpgXnYvTjOMhJpOO_-qQ4lj04yFFa2w_9PPxkpwFM2Rc_-4L8vr4sLt_LrcvT5v7u23pKKdNKRQyDFwFA9yDa6VXyDla5VxQItTBC6Na5I3kiorQuIDSm0XRGvCWWX5BNj9cH81eH1I_Lo_paHr9fYip0ybNvRtQQw2BCgrSeBSesUYGIWwQrbXKSmwWFvthuRRzThj-eBT0d836q2b9VbOWteYa-GK6_jUhxkHv43ualsCLhSohWv4J_2N84A</recordid><startdate>20200930</startdate><enddate>20200930</enddate><creator>Loikkanen, Juuso</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie</general><general>Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-6729</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200930</creationdate><title>The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability</title><author>Loikkanen, Juuso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1318-47e2ef37fa03d0c95d7e33eb7ccf74f6fd4a79e3853714f8cfe5da33e9a0db2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>argument</topic><topic>Christian Theology and Religion</topic><topic>design</topic><topic>intelligent design</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>natural theology</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loikkanen, Juuso</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Studia philosophiae christianae</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loikkanen, Juuso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability</atitle><jtitle>Studia philosophiae christianae</jtitle><addtitle>Studies in Christian Philosophy</addtitle><date>2020-09-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>51-72</pages><issn>0585-5470</issn><eissn>2720-0531</eissn><abstract>Some features within the physical universe appear to be so well-ordered that they have been regarded as evidence of the existence of a supernatural being who has designed them. This history of the so-called design argument is millennia-long, and various formulations of the argument have been presented. In this paper, I explore one contemporary version of the design argument proposed by the Intelligent Design movement, and analyze its advantages and disadvantages in comparison to one of the most famous classical versions of the argument.</abstract><pub>Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie</pub><doi>10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.03</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-6729</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0585-5470 |
| ispartof | Studia philosophiae christianae, 2020-09, Vol.56 (3), p.51-72 |
| issn | 0585-5470 2720-0531 |
| language | eng ; ger |
| recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_1017449 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | argument Christian Theology and Religion design intelligent design Metaphysics natural theology Philosophy of Religion |
| title | The design argument salvaged? Assessing the contemporary argument from improbability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20design%20argument%20salvaged?%20Assessing%20the%20contemporary%20argument%20from%20improbability&rft.jtitle=Studia%20philosophiae%20christianae&rft.au=Loikkanen,%20Juuso&rft.date=2020-09-30&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=51-72&rft.issn=0585-5470&rft.eissn=2720-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.03&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E1017449%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1017449&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_060f14105ade4d2285f44bf49bb7b5e8&rfr_iscdi=true |