Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej

A decade has passed since the introduction of the first participatory budgeting in Poland. During this time, the mechanism involving residents in the process of co-deciding a certain pool of public funds has become widespread in a significant number of Polish cities and towns. Moreover, voivodship,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Przegląd socjologiczny 2021-10, Vol.70 (4), p.39-60
1. Verfasser: Brzeziński, Kamil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:pol
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 4
container_start_page 39
container_title Przegląd socjologiczny
container_volume 70
creator Brzeziński, Kamil
description A decade has passed since the introduction of the first participatory budgeting in Poland. During this time, the mechanism involving residents in the process of co-deciding a certain pool of public funds has become widespread in a significant number of Polish cities and towns. Moreover, voivodship, school, academic and green variants of participatory budgeting have been introduced. However, universality is not a guarantee of quality. Polish budgets have one significant disadvantage, they generally lack a discussion component. This makes them a somewhat ostensible tool for participation. Nevertheless, despite the above disadvantage and relatively low financial resources, they have become a rather effective instrument for shaping space in towns and cities. Due to the shortcomings mentioned, I refer to this process as “quasi-participatory space creation.” In this paper, I present data on the results of quasi-participatory space creation in four selected cities. I analyse the first five editions of participatory budgeting carried out in these cities.
doi_str_mv 10.26485/PS/2021/70.4/3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1009714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1009714</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1009714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507-3e428c8bf43e4593f49b9f9dca508b311d051ce5cf7153dc0474a6f1d481aee73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjk1Lw0AQhhdRsNSePQkBz2lmsrvJ7lGLX1BQsfey2Uw0aZut-aA0R3-X1_4vVyr4HmZemGdmXsYuEaZxIpSMXt6iGGKMUpiKiJ-wUSwkhJoneMpGAJyHMZfJOZu0bQVeiZKYJiP2etvnh2_qApftd6ajdbsqg8qsXLAh-2HqctgE7dYdvsgONb27YLfvdqYZ_MQE22agtvOlLoNNSZXfpeqCnRVm3dLkr4_Z4v5uMXsM588PT7ObeWglpCEnESurskJ4JzUvhM50oXNrJKiMI-Yg0ZK0RYqS5xZEKkxSYC4UGqKUj9n18ey2cZ-9j7GsXN_U_uMyTlAjB4W_1NWRskRu_Y8ggE5R8B9vSl4T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619130817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Brzeziński, Kamil</creator><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Kamil</creatorcontrib><description>A decade has passed since the introduction of the first participatory budgeting in Poland. During this time, the mechanism involving residents in the process of co-deciding a certain pool of public funds has become widespread in a significant number of Polish cities and towns. Moreover, voivodship, school, academic and green variants of participatory budgeting have been introduced. However, universality is not a guarantee of quality. Polish budgets have one significant disadvantage, they generally lack a discussion component. This makes them a somewhat ostensible tool for participation. Nevertheless, despite the above disadvantage and relatively low financial resources, they have become a rather effective instrument for shaping space in towns and cities. Due to the shortcomings mentioned, I refer to this process as “quasi-participatory space creation.” In this paper, I present data on the results of quasi-participatory space creation in four selected cities. I analyse the first five editions of participatory budgeting carried out in these cities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2450-9361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26485/PS/2021/70.4/3</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>Lódz: Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe</publisher><subject>Budgeting ; Budgets ; Cities ; Planning ; Public finance ; Public spaces ; Sociology ; Urban areas ; Variants</subject><ispartof>Przegląd socjologiczny, 2021-10, Vol.70 (4), p.39-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright Lódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe 2021</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_65242.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Kamil</creatorcontrib><title>Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej</title><title>Przegląd socjologiczny</title><addtitle>Sociological Review</addtitle><description>A decade has passed since the introduction of the first participatory budgeting in Poland. During this time, the mechanism involving residents in the process of co-deciding a certain pool of public funds has become widespread in a significant number of Polish cities and towns. Moreover, voivodship, school, academic and green variants of participatory budgeting have been introduced. However, universality is not a guarantee of quality. Polish budgets have one significant disadvantage, they generally lack a discussion component. This makes them a somewhat ostensible tool for participation. Nevertheless, despite the above disadvantage and relatively low financial resources, they have become a rather effective instrument for shaping space in towns and cities. Due to the shortcomings mentioned, I refer to this process as “quasi-participatory space creation.” In this paper, I present data on the results of quasi-participatory space creation in four selected cities. I analyse the first five editions of participatory budgeting carried out in these cities.</description><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Variants</subject><issn>0033-2356</issn><issn>2450-9361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFjk1Lw0AQhhdRsNSePQkBz2lmsrvJ7lGLX1BQsfey2Uw0aZut-aA0R3-X1_4vVyr4HmZemGdmXsYuEaZxIpSMXt6iGGKMUpiKiJ-wUSwkhJoneMpGAJyHMZfJOZu0bQVeiZKYJiP2etvnh2_qApftd6ajdbsqg8qsXLAh-2HqctgE7dYdvsgONb27YLfvdqYZ_MQE22agtvOlLoNNSZXfpeqCnRVm3dLkr4_Z4v5uMXsM588PT7ObeWglpCEnESurskJ4JzUvhM50oXNrJKiMI-Yg0ZK0RYqS5xZEKkxSYC4UGqKUj9n18ey2cZ-9j7GsXN_U_uMyTlAjB4W_1NWRskRu_Y8ggE5R8B9vSl4T</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Brzeziński, Kamil</creator><general>Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe</general><general>Lodz Scientific Society</general><general>Lódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej</title><author>Brzeziński, Kamil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507-3e428c8bf43e4593f49b9f9dca508b311d051ce5cf7153dc0474a6f1d481aee73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Variants</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Kamil</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Przegląd socjologiczny</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brzeziński, Kamil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej</atitle><jtitle>Przegląd socjologiczny</jtitle><addtitle>Sociological Review</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>39-60</pages><issn>0033-2356</issn><eissn>2450-9361</eissn><abstract>A decade has passed since the introduction of the first participatory budgeting in Poland. During this time, the mechanism involving residents in the process of co-deciding a certain pool of public funds has become widespread in a significant number of Polish cities and towns. Moreover, voivodship, school, academic and green variants of participatory budgeting have been introduced. However, universality is not a guarantee of quality. Polish budgets have one significant disadvantage, they generally lack a discussion component. This makes them a somewhat ostensible tool for participation. Nevertheless, despite the above disadvantage and relatively low financial resources, they have become a rather effective instrument for shaping space in towns and cities. Due to the shortcomings mentioned, I refer to this process as “quasi-participatory space creation.” In this paper, I present data on the results of quasi-participatory space creation in four selected cities. I analyse the first five editions of participatory budgeting carried out in these cities.</abstract><cop>Lódz</cop><pub>Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe</pub><doi>10.26485/PS/2021/70.4/3</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2356
ispartof Przegląd socjologiczny, 2021-10, Vol.70 (4), p.39-60
issn 0033-2356
2450-9361
language pol
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_1009714
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Budgeting
Budgets
Cities
Planning
Public finance
Public spaces
Sociology
Urban areas
Variants
title Budżet obywatelski jako mechanizm społecznego wytwarzania przestrzeni miejskiej
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bud%C5%BCet%20obywatelski%20jako%20mechanizm%20spo%C5%82ecznego%20wytwarzania%20przestrzeni%20miejskiej&rft.jtitle=Przegl%C4%85d%20socjologiczny&rft.au=Brzezi%C5%84ski,%20Kamil&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=39-60&rft.issn=0033-2356&rft.eissn=2450-9361&rft_id=info:doi/10.26485/PS/2021/70.4/3&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E1009714%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619130817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1009714&rfr_iscdi=true