The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age
This article examines a subset of multilateral forums dealing with security problems posed by digital technologies, such as cyber warfare, cyber crime and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).1 It identifies structural issues that make it difficult for multilateral forums to discuss fast-moving...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International review of the Red Cross (2005) 2020-04, Vol.102 (913), p.261-285 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 285 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 913 |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | International review of the Red Cross (2005) |
| container_volume | 102 |
| creator | Gill, Amandeep S. |
| description | This article examines a subset of multilateral forums dealing with security problems posed by digital technologies, such as cyber warfare, cyber crime and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).1 It identifies structural issues that make it difficult for multilateral forums to discuss fast-moving digital issues and respond in time with the required norms and policy measures. Based on this problem analysis, and the recent experience of regulating cyber conflict and LAWS through Groups of Governmental Experts, the article proposes a schema for multilateral governance of digital technologies in armed conflict. The schema includes a heuristic for understanding human–machine interaction in order to operationalize accountability with international humanitarian law principles and international law applicable to armed conflict in the digital age. The article concludes with specific suggestions for advancing work in multilateral forums dealing with cyber weapons and lethal autonomy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1816383121000059 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1816383121000059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1816383121000059</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210420044877</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2501950866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d8df6783b0a38d71c824e0777da122221f8c7fb63c8d43dc2effa2ec4674f1cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQXkTBWv0B3hY8r-a1SXqUolYoeLCCt5Dm1ZTdTU2yB_-9Wap4EOeSMN9jZr6quobgFgLI7l4hhxRzDBEEpdrFSTWDFLCm5XxxWv4Fbib8vLpIaQ8AwagFs-p9szO12snB-cHVMXSmDrbuxy77TmYTZVfbEMc-1X6oo3Fj6U5MGXujaxUG23mVJzAXI-2dz0Uinbmszqzskrn6fufV2-PDZrlq1i9Pz8v7daMIanOjubaUcbwFEnPNoOKIGMAY0xKiUtByxeyWYsU1wVohY61ERhHKiIXK4nl1c_Q9xPAxmpTFPoxxKCNFORAuWsApLSx4ZKkYUorGikP0vYyfAgIxBSj-BFg0q6Mm9j4L6Xw6ZJGMjGon_FBSmdohOqGDn2wwhvSHhkCxIajETDhjxQp_j5f9NnrtzO-W_y_wBZdIiyI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501950866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gill, Amandeep S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, Amandeep S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines a subset of multilateral forums dealing with security problems posed by digital technologies, such as cyber warfare, cyber crime and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).1 It identifies structural issues that make it difficult for multilateral forums to discuss fast-moving digital issues and respond in time with the required norms and policy measures. Based on this problem analysis, and the recent experience of regulating cyber conflict and LAWS through Groups of Governmental Experts, the article proposes a schema for multilateral governance of digital technologies in armed conflict. The schema includes a heuristic for understanding human–machine interaction in order to operationalize accountability with international humanitarian law principles and international law applicable to armed conflict in the digital age. The article concludes with specific suggestions for advancing work in multilateral forums dealing with cyber weapons and lethal autonomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1816-3831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1607-5889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1816383121000059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Arms control & disarmament ; Artificial intelligence ; Artificial intelligence, autonomous weapon systems and their governance ; Autonomous weapons systems (International law) ; Autonomy ; Charters ; Cold War ; Conflict ; Crime ; Cybercrime ; Cyberterrorism ; Governance ; Heuristic ; Human-computer interaction ; Humanitarian law ; Humanitarianism ; International ; International conflict ; International law ; Internet ; Machine learning ; Multilateralism ; Network security ; Peace ; Responsibility ; Termination ; Trends ; War ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>International review of the Red Cross (2005), 2020-04, Vol.102 (913), p.261-285</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the ICRC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d8df6783b0a38d71c824e0777da122221f8c7fb63c8d43dc2effa2ec4674f1cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d8df6783b0a38d71c824e0777da122221f8c7fb63c8d43dc2effa2ec4674f1cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1816383121000059/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, Amandeep S.</creatorcontrib><title>The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age</title><title>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</title><addtitle>Int. rev. Red Cross</addtitle><description>This article examines a subset of multilateral forums dealing with security problems posed by digital technologies, such as cyber warfare, cyber crime and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).1 It identifies structural issues that make it difficult for multilateral forums to discuss fast-moving digital issues and respond in time with the required norms and policy measures. Based on this problem analysis, and the recent experience of regulating cyber conflict and LAWS through Groups of Governmental Experts, the article proposes a schema for multilateral governance of digital technologies in armed conflict. The schema includes a heuristic for understanding human–machine interaction in order to operationalize accountability with international humanitarian law principles and international law applicable to armed conflict in the digital age. The article concludes with specific suggestions for advancing work in multilateral forums dealing with cyber weapons and lethal autonomy.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Arms control & disarmament</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence, autonomous weapon systems and their governance</subject><subject>Autonomous weapons systems (International law)</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Cybercrime</subject><subject>Cyberterrorism</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Humanitarian law</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International conflict</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Network security</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Termination</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>1816-3831</issn><issn>1607-5889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQXkTBWv0B3hY8r-a1SXqUolYoeLCCt5Dm1ZTdTU2yB_-9Wap4EOeSMN9jZr6quobgFgLI7l4hhxRzDBEEpdrFSTWDFLCm5XxxWv4Fbib8vLpIaQ8AwagFs-p9szO12snB-cHVMXSmDrbuxy77TmYTZVfbEMc-1X6oo3Fj6U5MGXujaxUG23mVJzAXI-2dz0Uinbmszqzskrn6fufV2-PDZrlq1i9Pz8v7daMIanOjubaUcbwFEnPNoOKIGMAY0xKiUtByxeyWYsU1wVohY61ERhHKiIXK4nl1c_Q9xPAxmpTFPoxxKCNFORAuWsApLSx4ZKkYUorGikP0vYyfAgIxBSj-BFg0q6Mm9j4L6Xw6ZJGMjGon_FBSmdohOqGDn2wwhvSHhkCxIajETDhjxQp_j5f9NnrtzO-W_y_wBZdIiyI</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Gill, Amandeep S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age</title><author>Gill, Amandeep S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d8df6783b0a38d71c824e0777da122221f8c7fb63c8d43dc2effa2ec4674f1cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Arms control & disarmament</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence, autonomous weapon systems and their governance</topic><topic>Autonomous weapons systems (International law)</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Cybercrime</topic><topic>Cyberterrorism</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Humanitarian law</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International conflict</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Network security</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Termination</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, Amandeep S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, Amandeep S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age</atitle><jtitle>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</jtitle><addtitle>Int. rev. Red Cross</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>913</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>261-285</pages><issn>1816-3831</issn><eissn>1607-5889</eissn><abstract>This article examines a subset of multilateral forums dealing with security problems posed by digital technologies, such as cyber warfare, cyber crime and lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS).1 It identifies structural issues that make it difficult for multilateral forums to discuss fast-moving digital issues and respond in time with the required norms and policy measures. Based on this problem analysis, and the recent experience of regulating cyber conflict and LAWS through Groups of Governmental Experts, the article proposes a schema for multilateral governance of digital technologies in armed conflict. The schema includes a heuristic for understanding human–machine interaction in order to operationalize accountability with international humanitarian law principles and international law applicable to armed conflict in the digital age. The article concludes with specific suggestions for advancing work in multilateral forums dealing with cyber weapons and lethal autonomy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1816383121000059</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1816-3831 |
| ispartof | International review of the Red Cross (2005), 2020-04, Vol.102 (913), p.261-285 |
| issn | 1816-3831 1607-5889 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1816383121000059 |
| source | PAIS Index; Free E- Journals; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Accountability Arms control & disarmament Artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence, autonomous weapon systems and their governance Autonomous weapons systems (International law) Autonomy Charters Cold War Conflict Crime Cybercrime Cyberterrorism Governance Heuristic Human-computer interaction Humanitarian law Humanitarianism International International conflict International law Internet Machine learning Multilateralism Network security Peace Responsibility Termination Trends War Weapons |
| title | The changing role of multilateral forums in regulating armed conflict in the digital age |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A11%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20changing%20role%20of%20multilateral%20forums%20in%20regulating%20armed%20conflict%20in%20the%20digital%20age&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20the%20Red%20Cross%20(2005)&rft.au=Gill,%20Amandeep%20S.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=913&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=261-285&rft.issn=1816-3831&rft.eissn=1607-5889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1816383121000059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cambr%3E2501950866%3C/proquest_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501950866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1816383121000059&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210420044877&rfr_iscdi=true |