Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China
This paper combines an empirical analysis of national and international attempts to deal with the problem of poverty in China with a normative analysis of capability theory, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. In this way, it attempts to highlight the centrality of normative approaches...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of law in context 2018-03, Vol.14 (1), p.157-169 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | International journal of law in context |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Adler, Michael |
description | This paper combines an empirical analysis of national and international attempts to deal with the problem of poverty in China with a normative analysis of capability theory, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. In this way, it attempts to highlight the centrality of normative approaches to poverty and its elimination. The paper is in five parts. Section I analyses the history, development and effectiveness of social assistance under the Minimum Living Standards Scheme (MLSS) in China; Section II provides an outline of capability theory; Section III analyses the history, development and effectiveness of the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) Millennium Development Goals, with a focus on the elimination of poverty in China; Section IV emphasises the importance of a capability approach to the measurement of poverty and outlines what needs to be done to reduce poverty in China; while Section V discusses what still needs to be done to promote an effective anti-poverty strategy in China. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1744552317000556 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1744552317000556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1744552317000556</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20221107077566</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2364989848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-afab86238f7bbbe81841dbaa8c657e40a8c7951623fd39ae920299556a5806c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIvEOeD344gKtEiVOABny0ns1FXjFDtF4u9xaIED4rSzo5nZ0QJwieA1gkjcPCNBKWOYIAEhZIwfgclIlYwRdPyDMTkFZymtISRSEjUB8M46H3xoCxOaorEb_27juHaZ7XZd4UPddzblWcxWPphzcOLMJtmLw5yC14f7l9miXD7NH2e3y7KmhA2lcaaSHBPpRFVVViJJUVMZI2vOhKUwA6EYygrXEGWswhArlXsbJiGvBZmCq33uNvZvO5sGve53MeSTGhNOlVSSyqxCe1Ud-5SidXobfWfih0ZQj4_Rfx6TPYu9J3Z-0Kb1aTvoZE2sV9oH13_RfWx10_sxhhDEv2W5JUYICigE42MUOZw3XRV909rflv8X-ARjnHuh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364989848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Adler, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Adler, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This paper combines an empirical analysis of national and international attempts to deal with the problem of poverty in China with a normative analysis of capability theory, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. In this way, it attempts to highlight the centrality of normative approaches to poverty and its elimination. The paper is in five parts. Section I analyses the history, development and effectiveness of social assistance under the Minimum Living Standards Scheme (MLSS) in China; Section II provides an outline of capability theory; Section III analyses the history, development and effectiveness of the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) Millennium Development Goals, with a focus on the elimination of poverty in China; Section IV emphasises the importance of a capability approach to the measurement of poverty and outlines what needs to be done to reduce poverty in China; while Section V discusses what still needs to be done to promote an effective anti-poverty strategy in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-5523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1744552317000556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Counties ; Economic reform ; Education ; Employment ; Employment (Economic theory) ; Employment security ; Federal government ; Health care ; International Labour Organization ; Local government ; Migrant workers ; Poverty ; Regions ; Rural areas ; United Nations Development Programme ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>International journal of law in context, 2018-03, Vol.14 (1), p.157-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-afab86238f7bbbe81841dbaa8c657e40a8c7951623fd39ae920299556a5806c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744552317000556/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adler, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China</title><title>International journal of law in context</title><addtitle>International Journal of Law in Context</addtitle><description>This paper combines an empirical analysis of national and international attempts to deal with the problem of poverty in China with a normative analysis of capability theory, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. In this way, it attempts to highlight the centrality of normative approaches to poverty and its elimination. The paper is in five parts. Section I analyses the history, development and effectiveness of social assistance under the Minimum Living Standards Scheme (MLSS) in China; Section II provides an outline of capability theory; Section III analyses the history, development and effectiveness of the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) Millennium Development Goals, with a focus on the elimination of poverty in China; Section IV emphasises the importance of a capability approach to the measurement of poverty and outlines what needs to be done to reduce poverty in China; while Section V discusses what still needs to be done to promote an effective anti-poverty strategy in China.</description><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment (Economic theory)</subject><subject>Employment security</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>International Labour Organization</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Migrant workers</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>United Nations Development Programme</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>1744-5523</issn><issn>1744-5531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcIvEOeD344gKtEiVOABny0ns1FXjFDtF4u9xaIED4rSzo5nZ0QJwieA1gkjcPCNBKWOYIAEhZIwfgclIlYwRdPyDMTkFZymtISRSEjUB8M46H3xoCxOaorEb_27juHaZ7XZd4UPddzblWcxWPphzcOLMJtmLw5yC14f7l9miXD7NH2e3y7KmhA2lcaaSHBPpRFVVViJJUVMZI2vOhKUwA6EYygrXEGWswhArlXsbJiGvBZmCq33uNvZvO5sGve53MeSTGhNOlVSSyqxCe1Ud-5SidXobfWfih0ZQj4_Rfx6TPYu9J3Z-0Kb1aTvoZE2sV9oH13_RfWx10_sxhhDEv2W5JUYICigE42MUOZw3XRV909rflv8X-ARjnHuh</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Adler, Michael</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China</title><author>Adler, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-afab86238f7bbbe81841dbaa8c657e40a8c7951623fd39ae920299556a5806c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment (Economic theory)</topic><topic>Employment security</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>International Labour Organization</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Migrant workers</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>United Nations Development Programme</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adler, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of law in context</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adler, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law in context</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Law in Context</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>157-169</pages><issn>1744-5523</issn><eissn>1744-5531</eissn><abstract>This paper combines an empirical analysis of national and international attempts to deal with the problem of poverty in China with a normative analysis of capability theory, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. In this way, it attempts to highlight the centrality of normative approaches to poverty and its elimination. The paper is in five parts. Section I analyses the history, development and effectiveness of social assistance under the Minimum Living Standards Scheme (MLSS) in China; Section II provides an outline of capability theory; Section III analyses the history, development and effectiveness of the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) Millennium Development Goals, with a focus on the elimination of poverty in China; Section IV emphasises the importance of a capability approach to the measurement of poverty and outlines what needs to be done to reduce poverty in China; while Section V discusses what still needs to be done to promote an effective anti-poverty strategy in China.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1744552317000556</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-5523 |
ispartof | International journal of law in context, 2018-03, Vol.14 (1), p.157-169 |
issn | 1744-5523 1744-5531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1744552317000556 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Counties Economic reform Education Employment Employment (Economic theory) Employment security Federal government Health care International Labour Organization Local government Migrant workers Poverty Regions Rural areas United Nations Development Programme Urban areas |
title | Defining and delivering minimum incomes in China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A16%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20and%20delivering%20minimum%20incomes%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20in%20context&rft.au=Adler,%20Michael&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=157-169&rft.issn=1744-5523&rft.eissn=1744-5531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1744552317000556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cambr%3E2364989848%3C/proquest_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364989848&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1744552317000556&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20221107077566&rfr_iscdi=true |