Teachers Unions and Public Education

Public education is one of the most important “public goods” of a democratic society. In recent decades, public policy analysts, public intellectuals, and politicians have debated the state of public education in the United States and have argued about the sorts of public policies that might best pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives on politics 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.130-133
1. Verfasser: Swenson, Peter A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 1
container_start_page 130
container_title Perspectives on politics
container_volume 10
creator Swenson, Peter A.
description Public education is one of the most important “public goods” of a democratic society. In recent decades, public policy analysts, public intellectuals, and politicians have debated the state of public education in the United States and have argued about the sorts of public policies that might best promote the academic achievement, educational success, and political socialization of youth. Terry Moe and John Chubb have been important contributors to these debates. Their 1990 book, Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, set the terms of much subsequent discussion about the importance of school autonomy and “educational choice.” Moe's Special Interest extends these arguments through a more frontal critique of the role of teachers unions. This book represents an important contribution to public discussion of school reform. It also incorporates a distinctive perspective on the relationship between power and public policy, and between the role of states and that of markets in the provision of public goods and services. In this symposium, we feature a range of serious commentaries on the book's central arguments about educational policy and politics and on its approach to “engaged” or “applied” political science.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S153759271100466X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S153759271100466X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S153759271100466X</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S153759271100466X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cambridge_journals_10_1017_S153759271100466X3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDA01w82NDU2N7U0Mjc0NDAwMTOLYGLgNDQ1MdQ1sLQwYwGxjc11QfIcDFzFxVkGBkZGxgYWnAwqIamJyRmpRcUKoXmZ-XnFCol5KQoBpUk5mckKrimlyYklQFEeBta0xJziVF4ozc1g7OYa4uyhm5yYm1SUmZKeGp-VX1qUB5SLNzSIBzkoHsNBxuTpAgAvgTxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teachers Unions and Public Education</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><creator>Swenson, Peter A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>Public education is one of the most important “public goods” of a democratic society. In recent decades, public policy analysts, public intellectuals, and politicians have debated the state of public education in the United States and have argued about the sorts of public policies that might best promote the academic achievement, educational success, and political socialization of youth. Terry Moe and John Chubb have been important contributors to these debates. Their 1990 book, Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, set the terms of much subsequent discussion about the importance of school autonomy and “educational choice.” Moe's Special Interest extends these arguments through a more frontal critique of the role of teachers unions. This book represents an important contribution to public discussion of school reform. It also incorporates a distinctive perspective on the relationship between power and public policy, and between the role of states and that of markets in the provision of public goods and services. In this symposium, we feature a range of serious commentaries on the book's central arguments about educational policy and politics and on its approach to “engaged” or “applied” political science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S153759271100466X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.130-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S153759271100466X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><title>Teachers Unions and Public Education</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><description>Public education is one of the most important “public goods” of a democratic society. In recent decades, public policy analysts, public intellectuals, and politicians have debated the state of public education in the United States and have argued about the sorts of public policies that might best promote the academic achievement, educational success, and political socialization of youth. Terry Moe and John Chubb have been important contributors to these debates. Their 1990 book, Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, set the terms of much subsequent discussion about the importance of school autonomy and “educational choice.” Moe's Special Interest extends these arguments through a more frontal critique of the role of teachers unions. This book represents an important contribution to public discussion of school reform. It also incorporates a distinctive perspective on the relationship between power and public policy, and between the role of states and that of markets in the provision of public goods and services. In this symposium, we feature a range of serious commentaries on the book's central arguments about educational policy and politics and on its approach to “engaged” or “applied” political science.</description><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDA01w82NDU2N7U0Mjc0NDAwMTOLYGLgNDQ1MdQ1sLQwYwGxjc11QfIcDFzFxVkGBkZGxgYWnAwqIamJyRmpRcUKoXmZ-XnFCol5KQoBpUk5mckKrimlyYklQFEeBta0xJziVF4ozc1g7OYa4uyhm5yYm1SUmZKeGp-VX1qUB5SLNzSIBzkoHsNBxuTpAgAvgTxs</recordid><startdate>20120302</startdate><enddate>20120302</enddate><creator>Swenson, Peter A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20120302</creationdate><title>Teachers Unions and Public Education</title><author>Swenson, Peter A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cambridge_journals_10_1017_S153759271100466X3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swenson, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teachers Unions and Public Education</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><date>2012-03-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>130-133</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Public education is one of the most important “public goods” of a democratic society. In recent decades, public policy analysts, public intellectuals, and politicians have debated the state of public education in the United States and have argued about the sorts of public policies that might best promote the academic achievement, educational success, and political socialization of youth. Terry Moe and John Chubb have been important contributors to these debates. Their 1990 book, Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, set the terms of much subsequent discussion about the importance of school autonomy and “educational choice.” Moe's Special Interest extends these arguments through a more frontal critique of the role of teachers unions. This book represents an important contribution to public discussion of school reform. It also incorporates a distinctive perspective on the relationship between power and public policy, and between the role of states and that of markets in the provision of public goods and services. In this symposium, we feature a range of serious commentaries on the book's central arguments about educational policy and politics and on its approach to “engaged” or “applied” political science.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S153759271100466X</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5927
ispartof Perspectives on politics, 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.130-133
issn 1537-5927
1541-0986
language eng
recordid cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S153759271100466X
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals
title Teachers Unions and Public Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teachers%20Unions%20and%20Public%20Education&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Swenson,%20Peter%20A.&rft.date=2012-03-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=130-133&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S153759271100466X&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge%3E10_1017_S153759271100466X%3C/cambridge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S153759271100466X&rfr_iscdi=true