PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States
The conservation footprint is the collection of acreage in national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, national forests or other lands managed by the federal government. Their purpose is to maintain biological integrity and diversity (Monaghan, 2009). However, the United States (US) has fail...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental practice 2013-06, Vol.15 (2), p.169-172 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 172 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 169 |
| container_title | Environmental practice |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Samson, Fred Burton |
| description | The conservation footprint is the collection of acreage in national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, national forests or other lands managed by the federal government. Their purpose is to maintain biological integrity and diversity (Monaghan, 2009). However, the United States (US) has failed to develop an effective policy for the conservation footprint. This policy failure is the result of many factors (Biber, 2009), three of which are land tenure, self-constitution, and orchestrated regionalism. As a result, the very substance of US conservation is eroding. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1466046613000070 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1466046613000070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1466046613000070</cupid><sourcerecordid>1429873207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ef9a71c480338ac2ab3a4f183d9b6eefd8168fdcb263ec5f6fa23eb9aef772cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwANwsceHQFDsOcVJxQdssXWnRVpst12jijFtXiV1sh6oP0vet060qBAJLI1vzf_947EmS94weM8rEp4blRUFjME7jEvRFcjCnUpqL_OXzuSheJ2-8v6aUC1bSg-T-vN425_Vit_pRN2S53Xwnu7OaLFf1-vSEnOoBxxGIVSRcIVlY49H9gqCtIUtrw43TJpyQNZie7NBMDo9Ig4NKZzLoMM3kEZnljZNX6IODgD3Z4mUUYNB-JNo81r4welaaEAH_NnmlYPD47mk_TC6W9W5xlq4331aLr-tUcs5DiqoCwWReUs5LkBl0HHLFSt5XXYGo-pIVpepllxUc5WdVKMg4dhWgEiKTHT9MPu7r3jj7c4rttaP2EocBDNrJtyzPqlLwjIqIfvgDvbaTi2-IFC8yxvMqnym2p6Sz3jtUbfyiEdxdy2g7D6r9a1DR82Xv0UZZN8KtdUPfBrgbrFMOjNS-5f-z86crYeyc7i_xt87-6XoAxbanmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1362134947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Samson, Fred Burton</creator><creatorcontrib>Samson, Fred Burton</creatorcontrib><description>The conservation footprint is the collection of acreage in national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, national forests or other lands managed by the federal government. Their purpose is to maintain biological integrity and diversity (Monaghan, 2009). However, the United States (US) has failed to develop an effective policy for the conservation footprint. This policy failure is the result of many factors (Biber, 2009), three of which are land tenure, self-constitution, and orchestrated regionalism. As a result, the very substance of US conservation is eroding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-0466</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-0474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1466046613000070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Environmental policy ; Federal government ; Footprints ; Forest management ; Integrity ; Land ; Land management ; Land tenure ; National forests ; National parks ; Points of View ; Policies ; Regionalism ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife refuges</subject><ispartof>Environmental practice, 2013-06, Vol.15 (2), p.169-172</ispartof><rights>Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of Environmental Professionals</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ef9a71c480338ac2ab3a4f183d9b6eefd8168fdcb263ec5f6fa23eb9aef772cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ef9a71c480338ac2ab3a4f183d9b6eefd8168fdcb263ec5f6fa23eb9aef772cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1466046613000070/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samson, Fred Burton</creatorcontrib><title>PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States</title><title>Environmental practice</title><addtitle>Env Prac</addtitle><description>The conservation footprint is the collection of acreage in national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, national forests or other lands managed by the federal government. Their purpose is to maintain biological integrity and diversity (Monaghan, 2009). However, the United States (US) has failed to develop an effective policy for the conservation footprint. This policy failure is the result of many factors (Biber, 2009), three of which are land tenure, self-constitution, and orchestrated regionalism. As a result, the very substance of US conservation is eroding.</description><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Footprints</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>National forests</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Points of View</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife refuges</subject><issn>1466-0466</issn><issn>1466-0474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwANwsceHQFDsOcVJxQdssXWnRVpst12jijFtXiV1sh6oP0vet060qBAJLI1vzf_947EmS94weM8rEp4blRUFjME7jEvRFcjCnUpqL_OXzuSheJ2-8v6aUC1bSg-T-vN425_Vit_pRN2S53Xwnu7OaLFf1-vSEnOoBxxGIVSRcIVlY49H9gqCtIUtrw43TJpyQNZie7NBMDo9Ig4NKZzLoMM3kEZnljZNX6IODgD3Z4mUUYNB-JNo81r4welaaEAH_NnmlYPD47mk_TC6W9W5xlq4331aLr-tUcs5DiqoCwWReUs5LkBl0HHLFSt5XXYGo-pIVpepllxUc5WdVKMg4dhWgEiKTHT9MPu7r3jj7c4rttaP2EocBDNrJtyzPqlLwjIqIfvgDvbaTi2-IFC8yxvMqnym2p6Sz3jtUbfyiEdxdy2g7D6r9a1DR82Xv0UZZN8KtdUPfBrgbrFMOjNS-5f-z86crYeyc7i_xt87-6XoAxbanmw</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Samson, Fred Burton</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States</title><author>Samson, Fred Burton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ef9a71c480338ac2ab3a4f183d9b6eefd8168fdcb263ec5f6fa23eb9aef772cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Footprints</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>National forests</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Points of View</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife refuges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samson, Fred Burton</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samson, Fred Burton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Environmental practice</jtitle><addtitle>Env Prac</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>169-172</pages><issn>1466-0466</issn><eissn>1466-0474</eissn><abstract>The conservation footprint is the collection of acreage in national parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, national forests or other lands managed by the federal government. Their purpose is to maintain biological integrity and diversity (Monaghan, 2009). However, the United States (US) has failed to develop an effective policy for the conservation footprint. This policy failure is the result of many factors (Biber, 2009), three of which are land tenure, self-constitution, and orchestrated regionalism. As a result, the very substance of US conservation is eroding.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1466046613000070</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1466-0466 |
| ispartof | Environmental practice, 2013-06, Vol.15 (2), p.169-172 |
| issn | 1466-0466 1466-0474 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1466046613000070 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Conservation Conservation biology Environmental policy Federal government Footprints Forest management Integrity Land Land management Land tenure National forests National parks Points of View Policies Regionalism Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife refuges |
| title | PERSPECTIVES FROM THE FIELD: Dilemma of the Conservation Footprint: Land Tenure, Self-Constitution, and Orchestrated Regionalism in the United States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PERSPECTIVES%20FROM%20THE%20FIELD:%20Dilemma%20of%20the%20Conservation%20Footprint:%20Land%20Tenure,%20Self-Constitution,%20and%20Orchestrated%20Regionalism%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20practice&rft.au=Samson,%20Fred%20Burton&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=169-172&rft.issn=1466-0466&rft.eissn=1466-0474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1466046613000070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cambr%3E1429873207%3C/proquest_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1362134947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1466046613000070&rfr_iscdi=true |