ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO
War may be hell but it’s a godsend for litigators. Having previously ruled on the threshold questions of effective service of the writ and State immunity, and then in respect of an allegation of perjured evidence, the House of Lords was called on in Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Compan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge law journal 2002-12, Vol.61 (3), p.499-544 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 544 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 499 |
| container_title | Cambridge law journal |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | O’Keefe, Roger |
| description | War may be hell but it’s a godsend for litigators. Having previously ruled on the threshold questions of effective service of the writ and State immunity, and then in respect of an allegation of perjured evidence, the House of Lords was called on in Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Company (Nos. 4 & 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353 to consider the merits of this complicated case arising out of Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait in August 1990. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0008197302231700 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cambr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S0008197302231700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0008197302231700</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230510088193</informt_id><jstor_id>4508917</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4508917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-38768ef4cb669771ee969c7e3ff773e71e2763ce5a7c82657025fec6a43f69d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFOwjAUhhujiYg-gIkXi_fTdmXtejnHgMWxIQyNV80cHQ6FYTsSvfMhfEKfxM4hXhhvetLz_-c7-Q8ApwheIIjo5QRC6CBGMbQsjCiEe6CFOoSZFsJsH7Rq2az1Q3Ck1EJ_KXNYC_T8qB8Gk4Exml6FgWeMYv3eG0GU-OPITYI4crXsdz_fP9yoa3hxdOuPJ7pteKE7DnqB3zWSOD4GB3n6rMTJtrbBtOcn3sAM437guaGZYWI7JnYocUTeyR4IYZQiIRhhGRU4zynFQjcsSnAm7JRmjkVsCi07FxlJOzgnbGbjNjhvuGtZvmyEqvii3MiVXsl1bMYcCJk2ocaUyVIpKXK-lsUylW8cQV5fi_-5lp4ZNDNyWVQ8nRdqXXElUpk98mKVl9_tUs75rCxqDMaI_NgsaGFoI43UTKxRZw1qoapS7nZ3bOgwRLVsNnKhKvG6k1P5xAnF1Oakf8P73V40HN5d85H2422adPkgi9lc_Gb-P88XMnuWTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231998009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>O’Keefe, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Keefe, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>War may be hell but it’s a godsend for litigators. Having previously ruled on the threshold questions of effective service of the writ and State immunity, and then in respect of an allegation of perjured evidence, the House of Lords was called on in Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Company (Nos. 4 & 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353 to consider the merits of this complicated case arising out of Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait in August 1990.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2139</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0008197302231700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Airlines ; Annexation ; Case and Comment ; Corporations ; Court decisions ; Criminal conversion ; Defendants ; Immunity ; International law ; Litigation ; Public policy ; Public policy (Law) ; Rule of law ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Cambridge law journal, 2002-12, Vol.61 (3), p.499-544</ispartof><rights>Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2002</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4508917$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008197302231700/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,313,314,776,780,788,799,27899,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Keefe, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO</title><title>Cambridge law journal</title><addtitle>C.L.J</addtitle><description>War may be hell but it’s a godsend for litigators. Having previously ruled on the threshold questions of effective service of the writ and State immunity, and then in respect of an allegation of perjured evidence, the House of Lords was called on in Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Company (Nos. 4 & 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353 to consider the merits of this complicated case arising out of Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait in August 1990.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Annexation</subject><subject>Case and Comment</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Criminal conversion</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Public policy (Law)</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0008-1973</issn><issn>1469-2139</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFOwjAUhhujiYg-gIkXi_fTdmXtejnHgMWxIQyNV80cHQ6FYTsSvfMhfEKfxM4hXhhvetLz_-c7-Q8ApwheIIjo5QRC6CBGMbQsjCiEe6CFOoSZFsJsH7Rq2az1Q3Ck1EJ_KXNYC_T8qB8Gk4Exml6FgWeMYv3eG0GU-OPITYI4crXsdz_fP9yoa3hxdOuPJ7pteKE7DnqB3zWSOD4GB3n6rMTJtrbBtOcn3sAM437guaGZYWI7JnYocUTeyR4IYZQiIRhhGRU4zynFQjcsSnAm7JRmjkVsCi07FxlJOzgnbGbjNjhvuGtZvmyEqvii3MiVXsl1bMYcCJk2ocaUyVIpKXK-lsUylW8cQV5fi_-5lp4ZNDNyWVQ8nRdqXXElUpk98mKVl9_tUs75rCxqDMaI_NgsaGFoI43UTKxRZw1qoapS7nZ3bOgwRLVsNnKhKvG6k1P5xAnF1Oakf8P73V40HN5d85H2422adPkgi9lc_Gb-P88XMnuWTA</recordid><startdate>20021211</startdate><enddate>20021211</enddate><creator>O’Keefe, Roger</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021211</creationdate><title>ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO</title><author>O’Keefe, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-38768ef4cb669771ee969c7e3ff773e71e2763ce5a7c82657025fec6a43f69d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Annexation</topic><topic>Case and Comment</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Criminal conversion</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Public policy (Law)</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Keefe, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Keefe, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge law journal</jtitle><addtitle>C.L.J</addtitle><date>2002-12-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>499-544</pages><issn>0008-1973</issn><eissn>1469-2139</eissn><abstract>War may be hell but it’s a godsend for litigators. Having previously ruled on the threshold questions of effective service of the writ and State immunity, and then in respect of an allegation of perjured evidence, the House of Lords was called on in Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Company (Nos. 4 & 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353 to consider the merits of this complicated case arising out of Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait in August 1990.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0008197302231700</doi><tpages>46</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-1973 |
| ispartof | Cambridge law journal, 2002-12, Vol.61 (3), p.499-544 |
| issn | 0008-1973 1469-2139 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_S0008197302231700 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Aircraft Airlines Annexation Case and Comment Corporations Court decisions Criminal conversion Defendants Immunity International law Litigation Public policy Public policy (Law) Rule of law Torts |
| title | ENGLISH PUBLIC POLICY INTERNATIONALISED—AND CONVERSION CLARIFIED TOO |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cambr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ENGLISH%20PUBLIC%20POLICY%20INTERNATIONALISED%E2%80%94AND%20CONVERSION%20CLARIFIED%20TOO&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20law%20journal&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Keefe,%20Roger&rft.date=2002-12-11&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=499-544&rft.issn=0008-1973&rft.eissn=1469-2139&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0008197302231700&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cambr%3E4508917%3C/jstor_cambr%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231998009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0008197302231700&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230510088193&rft_jstor_id=4508917&rfr_iscdi=true |