Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution

A BEJEAP Advances article. Abstract Abstract The current paper addresses the relationship between trade and endogenous pollution levels, with a focus different from the previous literature. The mechanism linking pollution and trade here is that trade policy provides the home government with a credib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in economic analysis & policy 2004-11, Vol.4 (2), p.5
Hauptverfasser: Regibeau, Pierre M, Gallegos, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 5
container_title Advances in economic analysis & policy
container_volume 4
creator Regibeau, Pierre M
Gallegos, Alberto
description A BEJEAP Advances article. Abstract Abstract The current paper addresses the relationship between trade and endogenous pollution levels, with a focus different from the previous literature. The mechanism linking pollution and trade here is that trade policy provides the home government with a credible threat that helps motivate domestic firms to adopt cleaner technologies. This credible threat comes from the fact that the government has a greater incentive to protect a clean industry than to protect a very polluting one. In that sense, the existence of trade helps reduce domestic pollution compared to what would prevail in a situation of autarky. On the other hand, a commitment to free trade would be counterproductive: it removes the government’s ability to credibly threaten lower levels of protection. In fact we show that any trade liberalization hurts the welfare of the home country. In terms of world welfare, moderate trade liberalization is helpful, but only as long as it does not affect the technology choices of the firms. Because committing to lower ‘bounded’ tariffs limits a government’s ability to enforce strict environmental standards, a country that has agreed to tighter tariff limits under the World Trade Organization would, other things equal, be a more likely “pollution haven” than a country with weaker WTO commitments. Submitted: June 17, 2004 · Accepted: November 2, 2004 · Published: November 8, 2004 Originally published in Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy. Recommended Citation Regibeau, Pierre M. and Gallegos, Alberto (2004) "Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution," Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol4/iss2/art5
doi_str_mv 10.2202/1538-0637.1331
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_bepress_primary_bejeap1331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>853558011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3161-d62cb1906e862563cfde70cd1b40293bf8ede8ffbd29105070582d30bd17b8273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDtPw0AQhE8IJEKgpTYUVDjcw_dwicJTcgRIoaE53fnWyMGxzV0swb_HjiEF1ax2vxmtBqFTgmeUYnpFOFMxFkzOCGNkD01IynhMhKL7_fx3PERHIaww5gnhdILkwtTmHVy09MbB5ShRVlrwpiqD2ZRNHZnaRVmTmyp6bqqqG3bH6KAwVYCTX52i17vb5fwhzp7uH-fXWWwZESR2guaWpFiAEpQLlhcOJM4dsQmmKbOFAgeqKKyjKcEcS8wVdQxbR6RVVLIpuhhzW998dhA2el2GHKrK1NB0QTOpRKKY6sHzf-Cq6Xzd_6Ypljxh6RaajVDumxA8FLr15dr4b02wHkrUQ0966EkPJfaGeDSUYQNfO9r4Dy0kk1y_LBOdLdjNG-sTkp4_G3kLrYcQdg4LKzDtNvMHnyd8Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207543938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Regibeau, Pierre M ; Gallegos, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Regibeau, Pierre M ; Gallegos, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>A BEJEAP Advances article. Abstract Abstract The current paper addresses the relationship between trade and endogenous pollution levels, with a focus different from the previous literature. The mechanism linking pollution and trade here is that trade policy provides the home government with a credible threat that helps motivate domestic firms to adopt cleaner technologies. This credible threat comes from the fact that the government has a greater incentive to protect a clean industry than to protect a very polluting one. In that sense, the existence of trade helps reduce domestic pollution compared to what would prevail in a situation of autarky. On the other hand, a commitment to free trade would be counterproductive: it removes the government’s ability to credibly threaten lower levels of protection. In fact we show that any trade liberalization hurts the welfare of the home country. In terms of world welfare, moderate trade liberalization is helpful, but only as long as it does not affect the technology choices of the firms. Because committing to lower ‘bounded’ tariffs limits a government’s ability to enforce strict environmental standards, a country that has agreed to tighter tariff limits under the World Trade Organization would, other things equal, be a more likely “pollution haven” than a country with weaker WTO commitments. Submitted: June 17, 2004 · Accepted: November 2, 2004 · Published: November 8, 2004 Originally published in Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy. Recommended Citation Regibeau, Pierre M. and Gallegos, Alberto (2004) "Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution," Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol4/iss2/art5</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-0637</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-0637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2202/1538-0637.1331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: bepress</publisher><subject>Economic analysis ; Economic policy ; environment ; Environmental policy ; International trade ; Pollution ; Studies ; Tariffs ; trade ; Trade liberalization ; Trade policy ; Welfare ; World Trade Organization</subject><ispartof>Advances in economic analysis &amp; policy, 2004-11, Vol.4 (2), p.5</ispartof><rights>Copyright BERKELEY ELECTRONIC PRESS 2004</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3161-d62cb1906e862563cfde70cd1b40293bf8ede8ffbd29105070582d30bd17b8273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Regibeau, Pierre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallegos, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution</title><title>Advances in economic analysis &amp; policy</title><description>A BEJEAP Advances article. Abstract Abstract The current paper addresses the relationship between trade and endogenous pollution levels, with a focus different from the previous literature. The mechanism linking pollution and trade here is that trade policy provides the home government with a credible threat that helps motivate domestic firms to adopt cleaner technologies. This credible threat comes from the fact that the government has a greater incentive to protect a clean industry than to protect a very polluting one. In that sense, the existence of trade helps reduce domestic pollution compared to what would prevail in a situation of autarky. On the other hand, a commitment to free trade would be counterproductive: it removes the government’s ability to credibly threaten lower levels of protection. In fact we show that any trade liberalization hurts the welfare of the home country. In terms of world welfare, moderate trade liberalization is helpful, but only as long as it does not affect the technology choices of the firms. Because committing to lower ‘bounded’ tariffs limits a government’s ability to enforce strict environmental standards, a country that has agreed to tighter tariff limits under the World Trade Organization would, other things equal, be a more likely “pollution haven” than a country with weaker WTO commitments. Submitted: June 17, 2004 · Accepted: November 2, 2004 · Published: November 8, 2004 Originally published in Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy. Recommended Citation Regibeau, Pierre M. and Gallegos, Alberto (2004) "Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution," Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol4/iss2/art5</description><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>World Trade Organization</subject><issn>1538-0637</issn><issn>1935-1682</issn><issn>1538-0637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkDtPw0AQhE8IJEKgpTYUVDjcw_dwicJTcgRIoaE53fnWyMGxzV0swb_HjiEF1ax2vxmtBqFTgmeUYnpFOFMxFkzOCGNkD01IynhMhKL7_fx3PERHIaww5gnhdILkwtTmHVy09MbB5ShRVlrwpiqD2ZRNHZnaRVmTmyp6bqqqG3bH6KAwVYCTX52i17vb5fwhzp7uH-fXWWwZESR2guaWpFiAEpQLlhcOJM4dsQmmKbOFAgeqKKyjKcEcS8wVdQxbR6RVVLIpuhhzW998dhA2el2GHKrK1NB0QTOpRKKY6sHzf-Cq6Xzd_6Ypljxh6RaajVDumxA8FLr15dr4b02wHkrUQ0966EkPJfaGeDSUYQNfO9r4Dy0kk1y_LBOdLdjNG-sTkp4_G3kLrYcQdg4LKzDtNvMHnyd8Pw</recordid><startdate>20041108</startdate><enddate>20041108</enddate><creator>Regibeau, Pierre M</creator><creator>Gallegos, Alberto</creator><general>bepress</general><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Berkeley Electronic Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041108</creationdate><title>Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution</title><author>Regibeau, Pierre M ; Gallegos, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3161-d62cb1906e862563cfde70cd1b40293bf8ede8ffbd29105070582d30bd17b8273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>World Trade Organization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Regibeau, Pierre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallegos, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Advances in economic analysis &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Regibeau, Pierre M</au><au>Gallegos, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution</atitle><jtitle>Advances in economic analysis &amp; policy</jtitle><date>2004-11-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>5</spage><pages>5-</pages><issn>1538-0637</issn><eissn>1935-1682</eissn><eissn>1538-0637</eissn><abstract>A BEJEAP Advances article. Abstract Abstract The current paper addresses the relationship between trade and endogenous pollution levels, with a focus different from the previous literature. The mechanism linking pollution and trade here is that trade policy provides the home government with a credible threat that helps motivate domestic firms to adopt cleaner technologies. This credible threat comes from the fact that the government has a greater incentive to protect a clean industry than to protect a very polluting one. In that sense, the existence of trade helps reduce domestic pollution compared to what would prevail in a situation of autarky. On the other hand, a commitment to free trade would be counterproductive: it removes the government’s ability to credibly threaten lower levels of protection. In fact we show that any trade liberalization hurts the welfare of the home country. In terms of world welfare, moderate trade liberalization is helpful, but only as long as it does not affect the technology choices of the firms. Because committing to lower ‘bounded’ tariffs limits a government’s ability to enforce strict environmental standards, a country that has agreed to tighter tariff limits under the World Trade Organization would, other things equal, be a more likely “pollution haven” than a country with weaker WTO commitments. Submitted: June 17, 2004 · Accepted: November 2, 2004 · Published: November 8, 2004 Originally published in Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy. Recommended Citation Regibeau, Pierre M. and Gallegos, Alberto (2004) "Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution," Advances in Economic Analysis &amp; Policy: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol4/iss2/art5</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>bepress</pub><doi>10.2202/1538-0637.1331</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-0637
ispartof Advances in economic analysis & policy, 2004-11, Vol.4 (2), p.5
issn 1538-0637
1935-1682
1538-0637
language eng
recordid cdi_bepress_primary_bejeap1331
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Economic analysis
Economic policy
environment
Environmental policy
International trade
Pollution
Studies
Tariffs
trade
Trade liberalization
Trade policy
Welfare
World Trade Organization
title Managed Trade, Trade Liberalisation and Local Pollution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T07%3A34%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managed%20Trade,%20Trade%20Liberalisation%20and%20Local%20Pollution&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20economic%20analysis%20&%20policy&rft.au=Regibeau,%20Pierre%20M&rft.date=2004-11-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=5&rft.pages=5-&rft.issn=1538-0637&rft.eissn=1935-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.2202/1538-0637.1331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E853558011%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207543938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true