A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem

4th Irish Workshop on Formal Methods - A.J. Currie - Increasingly, model checking is being applied to more abstract problem domains than the traditional protocol analysis. - The extent to which such an approach is able to provide useful insight into the problem domain depends to a large degree on th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: A.J. Currie
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator A.J. Currie
description 4th Irish Workshop on Formal Methods - A.J. Currie - Increasingly, model checking is being applied to more abstract problem domains than the traditional protocol analysis. - The extent to which such an approach is able to provide useful insight into the problem domain depends to a large degree on the nature of the tool used. - This paper reports the results of a study using three different model checkers, which differ widely in their specification language, internal implementation, and facilities for specifying correctness properties. - An abstract model of an industrial distributed database application has been studied using the three tools. - A detailed model of the application using each of the tools is presented, and the extent to which each tool allows us to investigate interesting properties of the problem domain is compared. - Some conclusions are drawn regarding the usefulness of model checking at an abstract level and the importance of selecting a tool appropriate to the nature of the problem. - Our website uses cookies to help improve your experience. Find out more by reading our - .
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>bcs</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_bcs_primary_4195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-bcs_primary_41953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ibEOgjAUABsTE4kyu74fIIEAKYykaFw0DuykhUeoFtv01cG_l8HVWy6527AoKzhP6rysdiwmeqQrFU-LnEfs1oCwi5Nek32BnaCbPSJc7YgGxIzDEz1B45zROEKwIKHVFLxW77CGVgapJCHcvVUGlwPbTtIQxj_v2fF86sQlUQP1zutF-k9fZHWZ_z9fwik1Vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>A.J. Currie</creator><creatorcontrib>A.J. Currie</creatorcontrib><description>4th Irish Workshop on Formal Methods - A.J. Currie - Increasingly, model checking is being applied to more abstract problem domains than the traditional protocol analysis. - The extent to which such an approach is able to provide useful insight into the problem domain depends to a large degree on the nature of the tool used. - This paper reports the results of a study using three different model checkers, which differ widely in their specification language, internal implementation, and facilities for specifying correctness properties. - An abstract model of an industrial distributed database application has been studied using the three tools. - A detailed model of the application using each of the tools is presented, and the extent to which each tool allows us to investigate interesting properties of the problem domain is compared. - Some conclusions are drawn regarding the usefulness of model checking at an abstract level and the importance of selecting a tool appropriate to the nature of the problem. - Our website uses cookies to help improve your experience. Find out more by reading our - .</description><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT</publisher><subject>distributed database ; model checking</subject><ispartof>Electronic workshops in computing (Online), 2000</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,4050,4051,23930,23931,25140</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>A.J. Currie</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem</title><title>Electronic workshops in computing (Online)</title><description>4th Irish Workshop on Formal Methods - A.J. Currie - Increasingly, model checking is being applied to more abstract problem domains than the traditional protocol analysis. - The extent to which such an approach is able to provide useful insight into the problem domain depends to a large degree on the nature of the tool used. - This paper reports the results of a study using three different model checkers, which differ widely in their specification language, internal implementation, and facilities for specifying correctness properties. - An abstract model of an industrial distributed database application has been studied using the three tools. - A detailed model of the application using each of the tools is presented, and the extent to which each tool allows us to investigate interesting properties of the problem domain is compared. - Some conclusions are drawn regarding the usefulness of model checking at an abstract level and the importance of selecting a tool appropriate to the nature of the problem. - Our website uses cookies to help improve your experience. Find out more by reading our - .</description><subject>distributed database</subject><subject>model checking</subject><issn>1477-9358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ibEOgjAUABsTE4kyu74fIIEAKYykaFw0DuykhUeoFtv01cG_l8HVWy6527AoKzhP6rysdiwmeqQrFU-LnEfs1oCwi5Nek32BnaCbPSJc7YgGxIzDEz1B45zROEKwIKHVFLxW77CGVgapJCHcvVUGlwPbTtIQxj_v2fF86sQlUQP1zutF-k9fZHWZ_z9fwik1Vw</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>A.J. Currie</creator><general>BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT</general><scope>.90</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem</title><author>A.J. Currie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-bcs_primary_41953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>distributed database</topic><topic>model checking</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>A.J. Currie</creatorcontrib><collection>eWIC Workshops in Computing</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>A.J. Currie</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem</atitle><btitle>Electronic workshops in computing (Online)</btitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><eissn>1477-9358</eissn><abstract>4th Irish Workshop on Formal Methods - A.J. Currie - Increasingly, model checking is being applied to more abstract problem domains than the traditional protocol analysis. - The extent to which such an approach is able to provide useful insight into the problem domain depends to a large degree on the nature of the tool used. - This paper reports the results of a study using three different model checkers, which differ widely in their specification language, internal implementation, and facilities for specifying correctness properties. - An abstract model of an industrial distributed database application has been studied using the three tools. - A detailed model of the application using each of the tools is presented, and the extent to which each tool allows us to investigate interesting properties of the problem domain is compared. - Some conclusions are drawn regarding the usefulness of model checking at an abstract level and the importance of selecting a tool appropriate to the nature of the problem. - Our website uses cookies to help improve your experience. Find out more by reading our - .</abstract><pub>BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1477-9358
ispartof Electronic workshops in computing (Online), 2000
issn 1477-9358
language eng
recordid cdi_bcs_primary_4195
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects distributed database
model checking
title A Comparison of Three Model Checkers Applied to a Distributed Database Problem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A56%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-bcs&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Three%20Model%20Checkers%20Applied%20to%20a%20Distributed%20Database%20Problem&rft.btitle=Electronic%20workshops%20in%20computing%20(Online)&rft.au=A.J.%20Currie&rft.date=2000&rft.eissn=1477-9358&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cbcs%3E4195%3C/bcs%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true