Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences
An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and repo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Journal of the Audio Engineering Society |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Francombe, Jon Brookes, Tim Mason, Russell |
description | An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17743/jaes.2016.0070 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>audioengineering_FGG</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_audioengineering_primary_18555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCnMrF6QYEhrJ340bFUpD6mIisccbuzr4iokkZ0g8e9pKILpHunqO9L5CDnjbMK1Ftl0CxgnKeNqwphmB2TEpcgTkUt2RI5j3DKWKinkiLwtP6HqofNNTRtHn9tdhIrOe-sb-oRtaGxvfr4P2L03NtKLNYSO8ssruqy88d0fu8ZgsO36HX7tncOAtcF4Qg4dVBFPf--YvN4sXxZ3yerx9n4xXyWQ8bRLkHOrUiWc5inY0mnLZCnBZdZZoblFEMagMqBKyEvpJAMsc6bB5TAzQmVjMt33mtDEGNAVbfAfEL4KzoofKcUgpRikFIOUHXG-J2AYi_XG14jB15t_cialzL4BHCJnWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><source>AES Electronic Library</source><creator>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</creator><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-4950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2016.0070</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9953,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18555$$EView_record_in_Audio_Engineering_Society$$FView_record_in_$$GAudio_Engineering_Society</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><title>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</title><description>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</description><issn>1549-4950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FGG</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCnMrF6QYEhrJ340bFUpD6mIisccbuzr4iokkZ0g8e9pKILpHunqO9L5CDnjbMK1Ftl0CxgnKeNqwphmB2TEpcgTkUt2RI5j3DKWKinkiLwtP6HqofNNTRtHn9tdhIrOe-sb-oRtaGxvfr4P2L03NtKLNYSO8ssruqy88d0fu8ZgsO36HX7tncOAtcF4Qg4dVBFPf--YvN4sXxZ3yerx9n4xXyWQ8bRLkHOrUiWc5inY0mnLZCnBZdZZoblFEMagMqBKyEvpJAMsc6bB5TAzQmVjMt33mtDEGNAVbfAfEL4KzoofKcUgpRikFIOUHXG-J2AYi_XG14jB15t_cialzL4BHCJnWw</recordid><startdate>20170314</startdate><enddate>20170314</enddate><creator>Francombe, Jon</creator><creator>Brookes, Tim</creator><creator>Mason, Russell</creator><scope>FGG</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170314</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><author>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><collection>AES Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francombe, Jon</au><au>Brookes, Tim</au><au>Mason, Russell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</jtitle><date>2017-03-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>198-211</pages><issn>1549-4950</issn><abstract>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</abstract><doi>10.17743/jaes.2016.0070</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-4950 |
ispartof | Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211 |
issn | 1549-4950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_audioengineering_primary_18555 |
source | AES Electronic Library |
title | Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-audioengineering_FGG&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Spatial%20Audio%20Reproduction%20Methods%20(Part%201):%20Elicitation%20of%20Perceptual%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Audio%20Engineering%20Society&rft.au=Francombe,%20Jon&rft.date=2017-03-14&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=198-211&rft.issn=1549-4950&rft_id=info:doi/10.17743/jaes.2016.0070&rft_dat=%3Caudioengineering_FGG%3E18555%3C/audioengineering_FGG%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |