Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences

An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and repo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211
Hauptverfasser: Francombe, Jon, Brookes, Tim, Mason, Russell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 211
container_issue 3
container_start_page 198
container_title Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
container_volume 65
creator Francombe, Jon
Brookes, Tim
Mason, Russell
description An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.
doi_str_mv 10.17743/jaes.2016.0070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>audioengineering_FGG</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_audioengineering_primary_18555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCnMrF6QYEhrJ340bFUpD6mIisccbuzr4iokkZ0g8e9pKILpHunqO9L5CDnjbMK1Ftl0CxgnKeNqwphmB2TEpcgTkUt2RI5j3DKWKinkiLwtP6HqofNNTRtHn9tdhIrOe-sb-oRtaGxvfr4P2L03NtKLNYSO8ssruqy88d0fu8ZgsO36HX7tncOAtcF4Qg4dVBFPf--YvN4sXxZ3yerx9n4xXyWQ8bRLkHOrUiWc5inY0mnLZCnBZdZZoblFEMagMqBKyEvpJAMsc6bB5TAzQmVjMt33mtDEGNAVbfAfEL4KzoofKcUgpRikFIOUHXG-J2AYi_XG14jB15t_cialzL4BHCJnWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><source>AES Electronic Library</source><creator>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</creator><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-4950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2016.0070</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9953,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18555$$EView_record_in_Audio_Engineering_Society$$FView_record_in_$$GAudio_Engineering_Society</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><title>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</title><description>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</description><issn>1549-4950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FGG</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCnMrF6QYEhrJ340bFUpD6mIisccbuzr4iokkZ0g8e9pKILpHunqO9L5CDnjbMK1Ftl0CxgnKeNqwphmB2TEpcgTkUt2RI5j3DKWKinkiLwtP6HqofNNTRtHn9tdhIrOe-sb-oRtaGxvfr4P2L03NtKLNYSO8ssruqy88d0fu8ZgsO36HX7tncOAtcF4Qg4dVBFPf--YvN4sXxZ3yerx9n4xXyWQ8bRLkHOrUiWc5inY0mnLZCnBZdZZoblFEMagMqBKyEvpJAMsc6bB5TAzQmVjMt33mtDEGNAVbfAfEL4KzoofKcUgpRikFIOUHXG-J2AYi_XG14jB15t_cialzL4BHCJnWw</recordid><startdate>20170314</startdate><enddate>20170314</enddate><creator>Francombe, Jon</creator><creator>Brookes, Tim</creator><creator>Mason, Russell</creator><scope>FGG</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170314</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</title><author>Francombe, Jon ; Brookes, Tim ; Mason, Russell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-e11d6264f712adbf7d05b5af3dfd471dea4cce6ca6ba9b5f50aeb907af9a8c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francombe, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Russell</creatorcontrib><collection>AES Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francombe, Jon</au><au>Brookes, Tim</au><au>Mason, Russell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Audio Engineering Society</jtitle><date>2017-03-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>198-211</pages><issn>1549-4950</issn><abstract>An experiment was performed to determine the attributes that contribute to listener preference for a range of spatial audio reproduction methods. Experienced and inexperienced listeners made preference ratings for combinations of seven program items replayed over eight reproduction systems, and reported the reasons for their judgments. Automatic text clustering reduced redundancy in the responses by approximately 90%, thereby facilitating subsequent group discussions that produced clear attribute labels, descriptions, and scale end-points. Twenty-seven and twenty-four attributes contributed to preference for the experienced and inexperienced listeners respectively. The two sets of attributes contain a degree of overlap (ten attributes from the two sets were closely related); the experienced listeners used more technical terms while the inexperienced listeners used broader descriptive categories.</abstract><doi>10.17743/jaes.2016.0070</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1549-4950
ispartof Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 2017-03, Vol.65 (3), p.198-211
issn 1549-4950
language eng
recordid cdi_audioengineering_primary_18555
source AES Electronic Library
title Evaluation of Spatial Audio Reproduction Methods (Part 1): Elicitation of Perceptual Differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-audioengineering_FGG&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Spatial%20Audio%20Reproduction%20Methods%20(Part%201):%20Elicitation%20of%20Perceptual%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Audio%20Engineering%20Society&rft.au=Francombe,%20Jon&rft.date=2017-03-14&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=198-211&rft.issn=1549-4950&rft_id=info:doi/10.17743/jaes.2016.0070&rft_dat=%3Caudioengineering_FGG%3E18555%3C/audioengineering_FGG%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true