The ethics of offsetting nature
Biodiversity offsetting is transforming conservation practice around the world. Development activities that degrade or destroy biodiversity at one location are now increasingly acceptable because of compensatory environmental gains generated elsewhere. This change represents a major shift in how nat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2015-12, Vol.13 (10), p.568-573 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 573 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 568 |
container_title | Frontiers in ecology and the environment |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ives, Christopher D Bekessy, Sarah A |
description | Biodiversity offsetting is transforming conservation practice around the world. Development activities that degrade or destroy biodiversity at one location are now increasingly acceptable because of compensatory environmental gains generated elsewhere. This change represents a major shift in how nature is protected, and yet its philosophical justification has received little attention. We argue that biodiversity offsetting aligns most easily with a utilitarian ethic, where outcomes rather than actions are the focus. However, offsetting schemes often neglect to account for the multiple values that people assign to biodiversity - including unique, place-based values. Furthermore, the implications of defining nature as a tradeable commodity may affect our sense of obligation to protect biodiversity. Ironically, offsetting may exacerbate environmental harm because it erodes ethical barriers based on moral objections to the destruction of biodiversity. By failing to consider the ethical implications of biodiversity offsetting, we risk compromising the underlying motivations for protecting nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/150021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_atypo</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_atypon_esa_10_1890_150021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44000911</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44000911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4278-34974b31014f5d43dd5caba80d0090d2868512f1d96d451321008961aa14eeee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-A1mfxJfqvfnTNY8imwoDH9yeQ9akW0fX1iRD9-3NqPqihkAu5HcO5x5CLhFuMZdwhwKA4hEZoOCQSgby-HumUpySM-83kWBUsAEZzdc2sWFdFT5py3hLb0OomlXS6LBz9pyclLr29uLrHZLFdDJ_eEpnL4_PD_ezVHM6zlPG5ZgvGQLyUhjOjBGFXuocDIAEQ_MsF0hLNDIzXCCjCJDLDLVGbuNhQ3LT-3aufdtZH9S28oWta93YducVjsdZxhkTLKLXPVq41ntnS9W5aqvdXiGoQwOqbyCCtAffq9ru_6HUdDKhgDETgsjyKLrqRRsfWvcj4hziJngwHfX_pW6VXrnKq8VrNMgAUEZKRiLpCR32Xdso6_XvZH8gfZzOlCp8BPYJ6Yt_UA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776643353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ethics of offsetting nature</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ives, Christopher D ; Bekessy, Sarah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ives, Christopher D ; Bekessy, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><description>Biodiversity offsetting is transforming conservation practice around the world. Development activities that degrade or destroy biodiversity at one location are now increasingly acceptable because of compensatory environmental gains generated elsewhere. This change represents a major shift in how nature is protected, and yet its philosophical justification has received little attention. We argue that biodiversity offsetting aligns most easily with a utilitarian ethic, where outcomes rather than actions are the focus. However, offsetting schemes often neglect to account for the multiple values that people assign to biodiversity - including unique, place-based values. Furthermore, the implications of defining nature as a tradeable commodity may affect our sense of obligation to protect biodiversity. Ironically, offsetting may exacerbate environmental harm because it erodes ethical barriers based on moral objections to the destruction of biodiversity. By failing to consider the ethical implications of biodiversity offsetting, we risk compromising the underlying motivations for protecting nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/150021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Bioethics ; CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS ; Deontological ethics ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental ethics ; ethics ; motivation ; Nature ; people ; Scientific ethics ; Virtue ethics</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2015-12, Vol.13 (10), p.568-573</ispartof><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4278-34974b31014f5d43dd5caba80d0090d2868512f1d96d451321008961aa14eeee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4278-34974b31014f5d43dd5caba80d0090d2868512f1d96d451321008961aa14eeee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44000911$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44000911$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ives, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><title>The ethics of offsetting nature</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Biodiversity offsetting is transforming conservation practice around the world. Development activities that degrade or destroy biodiversity at one location are now increasingly acceptable because of compensatory environmental gains generated elsewhere. This change represents a major shift in how nature is protected, and yet its philosophical justification has received little attention. We argue that biodiversity offsetting aligns most easily with a utilitarian ethic, where outcomes rather than actions are the focus. However, offsetting schemes often neglect to account for the multiple values that people assign to biodiversity - including unique, place-based values. Furthermore, the implications of defining nature as a tradeable commodity may affect our sense of obligation to protect biodiversity. Ironically, offsetting may exacerbate environmental harm because it erodes ethical barriers based on moral objections to the destruction of biodiversity. By failing to consider the ethical implications of biodiversity offsetting, we risk compromising the underlying motivations for protecting nature.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</subject><subject>Deontological ethics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>motivation</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>Scientific ethics</subject><subject>Virtue ethics</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-A1mfxJfqvfnTNY8imwoDH9yeQ9akW0fX1iRD9-3NqPqihkAu5HcO5x5CLhFuMZdwhwKA4hEZoOCQSgby-HumUpySM-83kWBUsAEZzdc2sWFdFT5py3hLb0OomlXS6LBz9pyclLr29uLrHZLFdDJ_eEpnL4_PD_ezVHM6zlPG5ZgvGQLyUhjOjBGFXuocDIAEQ_MsF0hLNDIzXCCjCJDLDLVGbuNhQ3LT-3aufdtZH9S28oWta93YducVjsdZxhkTLKLXPVq41ntnS9W5aqvdXiGoQwOqbyCCtAffq9ru_6HUdDKhgDETgsjyKLrqRRsfWvcj4hziJngwHfX_pW6VXrnKq8VrNMgAUEZKRiLpCR32Xdso6_XvZH8gfZzOlCp8BPYJ6Yt_UA</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Ives, Christopher D</creator><creator>Bekessy, Sarah A</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>The ethics of offsetting nature</title><author>Ives, Christopher D ; Bekessy, Sarah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4278-34974b31014f5d43dd5caba80d0090d2868512f1d96d451321008961aa14eeee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS</topic><topic>Deontological ethics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>motivation</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>Scientific ethics</topic><topic>Virtue ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ives, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ives, Christopher D</au><au>Bekessy, Sarah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ethics of offsetting nature</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>568</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>568-573</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Biodiversity offsetting is transforming conservation practice around the world. Development activities that degrade or destroy biodiversity at one location are now increasingly acceptable because of compensatory environmental gains generated elsewhere. This change represents a major shift in how nature is protected, and yet its philosophical justification has received little attention. We argue that biodiversity offsetting aligns most easily with a utilitarian ethic, where outcomes rather than actions are the focus. However, offsetting schemes often neglect to account for the multiple values that people assign to biodiversity - including unique, place-based values. Furthermore, the implications of defining nature as a tradeable commodity may affect our sense of obligation to protect biodiversity. Ironically, offsetting may exacerbate environmental harm because it erodes ethical barriers based on moral objections to the destruction of biodiversity. By failing to consider the ethical implications of biodiversity offsetting, we risk compromising the underlying motivations for protecting nature.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/150021</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-9295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2015-12, Vol.13 (10), p.568-573 |
issn | 1540-9295 1540-9309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_atypon_esa_10_1890_150021 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation Bioethics CONCEPTS AND QUESTIONS Deontological ethics Ecosystems Environmental conservation Environmental ethics ethics motivation Nature people Scientific ethics Virtue ethics |
title | The ethics of offsetting nature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_atypo&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ethics%20of%20offsetting%20nature&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Ives,%20Christopher%20D&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=568&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=568-573&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/150021&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_atypo%3E44000911%3C/jstor_atypo%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776643353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44000911&rfr_iscdi=true |