Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods

Specific surface area (SSA) is a valuable intrinsic property of clayey soils that can be directly related to more general properties and engineering behavior, including plasticity, cation exchange capacity, and swelling behavior, among many others. Laboratory methods available for estimating SSA, ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geotechnical testing journal 2014-11, Vol.37 (6), p.1016-1027
Hauptverfasser: Akin, Idil Deniz, Likos, William J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1027
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1016
container_title Geotechnical testing journal
container_volume 37
creator Akin, Idil Deniz
Likos, William J.
description Specific surface area (SSA) is a valuable intrinsic property of clayey soils that can be directly related to more general properties and engineering behavior, including plasticity, cation exchange capacity, and swelling behavior, among many others. Laboratory methods available for estimating SSA, however, remain somewhat complicated and are not routinely used in geotechnical practice. This paper evaluates and compares methods for determining SSA using the conventional ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method and various approaches involving sorption of water vapor under controlled humidity conditions. Surface areas estimated from water vapor adsorption and desorption isotherms are comparable for non-expansive clays with SSA values less than about 100 m2/g. Measurements are appreciably different for soils containing expansive clay minerals, where the SSA estimated via Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of desorption isotherms is consistently about twice the SSA determined from adsorption isotherms. Surface areas estimated from water vapor and EGME methods are comparable at SSAs less than 100 m2/g, but measurements obtained using water vapor for larger SSAs are consistently about half of the EGME-based values. Simplified one-point methods for estimating SSA using water vapor sorption compare well with BET-based methods for SSAs less than 150 m2/g. Recommendations are provided for applying water vapor and EGME sorption methods in geotechnical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1520/GTJ20140064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>astm_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_GTJ20140064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1520_GTJ20140064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-9e18d2949ea27ceae68b86089f968a3b8c489623c64bd79d6447f3e7fbb7e5c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEURRujiYiu_ANdmpjRfk0_dhICiIG4AHTZdDqtDoHppB0W-OsdggsXhNVLXs595-UCcI_RE84Jep4s3wjCDCHOLkAPK5ZnImf5Jeh1W5VxjPNrcJPSGiEsiSA9MF00zla-snCxi95YBwfRGRg8HG7MHq5SVX_BT9O6CD9MEyI0dQlHk_kILkJs2irUcO7a71CmW3DlzSa5u7_ZB6vxaDl8zWbvk-lwMMsMFbTNlMOyJIopZ4iwzjguC8mRVF5xaWghLZOKE2o5K0qhSs6Y8NQJXxTC5VbSPng83rUxpBSd102stibuNUb60IL-10JHqyNtUrvV67CLdffcAdFUaK5_quZUTjel77IPp7KnNS9nNUhhhNVZ2y9UVIBS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods</title><source>ASTM Journals</source><creator>Akin, Idil Deniz ; Likos, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akin, Idil Deniz ; Likos, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Specific surface area (SSA) is a valuable intrinsic property of clayey soils that can be directly related to more general properties and engineering behavior, including plasticity, cation exchange capacity, and swelling behavior, among many others. Laboratory methods available for estimating SSA, however, remain somewhat complicated and are not routinely used in geotechnical practice. This paper evaluates and compares methods for determining SSA using the conventional ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method and various approaches involving sorption of water vapor under controlled humidity conditions. Surface areas estimated from water vapor adsorption and desorption isotherms are comparable for non-expansive clays with SSA values less than about 100 m2/g. Measurements are appreciably different for soils containing expansive clay minerals, where the SSA estimated via Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of desorption isotherms is consistently about twice the SSA determined from adsorption isotherms. Surface areas estimated from water vapor and EGME methods are comparable at SSAs less than 100 m2/g, but measurements obtained using water vapor for larger SSAs are consistently about half of the EGME-based values. Simplified one-point methods for estimating SSA using water vapor sorption compare well with BET-based methods for SSAs less than 150 m2/g. Recommendations are provided for applying water vapor and EGME sorption methods in geotechnical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-6115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20140064</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GTJODJ</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Geotechnical testing journal, 2014-11, Vol.37 (6), p.1016-1027</ispartof><rights>All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of the publisher.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-9e18d2949ea27ceae68b86089f968a3b8c489623c64bd79d6447f3e7fbb7e5c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-9e18d2949ea27ceae68b86089f968a3b8c489623c64bd79d6447f3e7fbb7e5c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,9790,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akin, Idil Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likos, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods</title><title>Geotechnical testing journal</title><description>Specific surface area (SSA) is a valuable intrinsic property of clayey soils that can be directly related to more general properties and engineering behavior, including plasticity, cation exchange capacity, and swelling behavior, among many others. Laboratory methods available for estimating SSA, however, remain somewhat complicated and are not routinely used in geotechnical practice. This paper evaluates and compares methods for determining SSA using the conventional ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method and various approaches involving sorption of water vapor under controlled humidity conditions. Surface areas estimated from water vapor adsorption and desorption isotherms are comparable for non-expansive clays with SSA values less than about 100 m2/g. Measurements are appreciably different for soils containing expansive clay minerals, where the SSA estimated via Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of desorption isotherms is consistently about twice the SSA determined from adsorption isotherms. Surface areas estimated from water vapor and EGME methods are comparable at SSAs less than 100 m2/g, but measurements obtained using water vapor for larger SSAs are consistently about half of the EGME-based values. Simplified one-point methods for estimating SSA using water vapor sorption compare well with BET-based methods for SSAs less than 150 m2/g. Recommendations are provided for applying water vapor and EGME sorption methods in geotechnical practice.</description><issn>0149-6115</issn><issn>1945-7545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEURRujiYiu_ANdmpjRfk0_dhICiIG4AHTZdDqtDoHppB0W-OsdggsXhNVLXs595-UCcI_RE84Jep4s3wjCDCHOLkAPK5ZnImf5Jeh1W5VxjPNrcJPSGiEsiSA9MF00zla-snCxi95YBwfRGRg8HG7MHq5SVX_BT9O6CD9MEyI0dQlHk_kILkJs2irUcO7a71CmW3DlzSa5u7_ZB6vxaDl8zWbvk-lwMMsMFbTNlMOyJIopZ4iwzjguC8mRVF5xaWghLZOKE2o5K0qhSs6Y8NQJXxTC5VbSPng83rUxpBSd102stibuNUb60IL-10JHqyNtUrvV67CLdffcAdFUaK5_quZUTjel77IPp7KnNS9nNUhhhNVZ2y9UVIBS</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Akin, Idil Deniz</creator><creator>Likos, William J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods</title><author>Akin, Idil Deniz ; Likos, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-9e18d2949ea27ceae68b86089f968a3b8c489623c64bd79d6447f3e7fbb7e5c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akin, Idil Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likos, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geotechnical testing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akin, Idil Deniz</au><au>Likos, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods</atitle><jtitle>Geotechnical testing journal</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1016</spage><epage>1027</epage><pages>1016-1027</pages><issn>0149-6115</issn><eissn>1945-7545</eissn><coden>GTJODJ</coden><abstract>Specific surface area (SSA) is a valuable intrinsic property of clayey soils that can be directly related to more general properties and engineering behavior, including plasticity, cation exchange capacity, and swelling behavior, among many others. Laboratory methods available for estimating SSA, however, remain somewhat complicated and are not routinely used in geotechnical practice. This paper evaluates and compares methods for determining SSA using the conventional ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method and various approaches involving sorption of water vapor under controlled humidity conditions. Surface areas estimated from water vapor adsorption and desorption isotherms are comparable for non-expansive clays with SSA values less than about 100 m2/g. Measurements are appreciably different for soils containing expansive clay minerals, where the SSA estimated via Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of desorption isotherms is consistently about twice the SSA determined from adsorption isotherms. Surface areas estimated from water vapor and EGME methods are comparable at SSAs less than 100 m2/g, but measurements obtained using water vapor for larger SSAs are consistently about half of the EGME-based values. Simplified one-point methods for estimating SSA using water vapor sorption compare well with BET-based methods for SSAs less than 150 m2/g. Recommendations are provided for applying water vapor and EGME sorption methods in geotechnical practice.</abstract><doi>10.1520/GTJ20140064</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-6115
ispartof Geotechnical testing journal, 2014-11, Vol.37 (6), p.1016-1027
issn 0149-6115
1945-7545
language eng
recordid cdi_astm_journals_10_1520_GTJ20140064
source ASTM Journals
title Specific Surface Area of Clay Using Water Vapor and EGME Sorption Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A13%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-astm_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specific%20Surface%20Area%20of%20Clay%20Using%20Water%20Vapor%20and%20EGME%20Sorption%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Geotechnical%20testing%20journal&rft.au=Akin,%20Idil%20Deniz&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1016&rft.epage=1027&rft.pages=1016-1027&rft.issn=0149-6115&rft.eissn=1945-7545&rft.coden=GTJODJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1520/GTJ20140064&rft_dat=%3Castm_cross%3E10_1520_GTJ20140064%3C/astm_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true