Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis

Cyclosporiasis has historically been underdiagnosed due to a lack of clinical recognition and challenges in laboratory detection. Microscopic detection of requires either the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast or safranin stains, which are not part of the standard ova-and-parasite examination. Altern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2024-12, p.e0108424
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Angela, Mathison, Blaine A, Couturier, Marc Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e0108424
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume
creator Ma, Angela
Mathison, Blaine A
Couturier, Marc Roger
description Cyclosporiasis has historically been underdiagnosed due to a lack of clinical recognition and challenges in laboratory detection. Microscopic detection of requires either the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast or safranin stains, which are not part of the standard ova-and-parasite examination. Alternatively, the use of fluorescence microscopy for the detection of due to the organism's autofluorescent properties has been an available tool in the field of clinical parasitology. However, it is unknown how ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence performs compared to permanent stains in routine diagnostic laboratory settings. In this study, we present a direct head-to-head comparison of UV fluorescence against modified acid-fast (MAF) stains using 50 (35 positive, 5 positive, and 10 negative) blinded, concentrated stool specimens. Five technically competent medical laboratory technologists of varying years of experience in clinical parasitology at a large reference laboratory independently read each of the MAF slides and UV wet mounts. Overall, the performance of UV fluorescence was similar to MAF slides with a higher agreement of 88.8% (95% CI 86.3%-91.3%) compared to 85.2% (95% CI 84.2%-86.2%), respectively. A higher false-negative rate was associated with MAF slides (MAF: 11.6%, UV: 6.8%). However, UV fluorescence was found to have a higher proportion of false positives (UF: 3.2%, MAF: 2%) and misidentified coccidia. Discrepant results regardless of methods were more frequently observed with technologists who have less experience in parasite morphology. This study is the first to document evidence to support the increased sensitivity and utility of UV fluorescence to improve laboratory diagnosis of cyclosporiasis. This study is important as there is a dearth of studies in our field of clinical parasitology that investigate and establish performance characteristics of classic and newer, non-molecular methods. While these studies may not seem as heavy hitting as some new technologies described in our related disciplines, for our field, such studies are long overdue and critically lacking.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/jcm.01084-24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_asm2_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_asm2_journals_10_1128_jcm_01084_24</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39651868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-ec4f286d7b8fed7821b72bf96f8d9d9971db3b859182ef867673bef35a278a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kDlPwzAAhS0EoqWwMSOvDCm2k_hgQxWXVImhDGyW46NxlcSR3bTqwH8nBTo96ekd0gfALUZzjAl_2Oh2jjDiRUaKMzDFSPCMUvR1DqYIiTLDOGcTcJXSBiFcFGV5CSa5oCXmlE_B96q2xvhuDTu7h41f11sYOrg46CakPkQFH2Ed9nBbWzgkC4ODQ7ONaudDY7fQNUOINmnbaQtbr2NIOvQHqFUHfdvHsLPQeLXuQvLpWNanYa9G5xpcONUke_OvM7B6ef5cvGXLj9f3xdMyU6IsMqsLRzg1rOLOGsYJrhipnKCOG2GEYNhUecVLgTmxjlNGWV5Zl5eKMK5wPgP3f6sqtURuwhC78UxiJI8A5QhQ_gKUpBizd3_Zfqhaa2QffaviQZ6I5T94aG7G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis</title><source>American Society for Microbiology Journals</source><creator>Ma, Angela ; Mathison, Blaine A ; Couturier, Marc Roger</creator><contributor>Pritt, Bobbi S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ma, Angela ; Mathison, Blaine A ; Couturier, Marc Roger ; Pritt, Bobbi S.</creatorcontrib><description>Cyclosporiasis has historically been underdiagnosed due to a lack of clinical recognition and challenges in laboratory detection. Microscopic detection of requires either the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast or safranin stains, which are not part of the standard ova-and-parasite examination. Alternatively, the use of fluorescence microscopy for the detection of due to the organism's autofluorescent properties has been an available tool in the field of clinical parasitology. However, it is unknown how ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence performs compared to permanent stains in routine diagnostic laboratory settings. In this study, we present a direct head-to-head comparison of UV fluorescence against modified acid-fast (MAF) stains using 50 (35 positive, 5 positive, and 10 negative) blinded, concentrated stool specimens. Five technically competent medical laboratory technologists of varying years of experience in clinical parasitology at a large reference laboratory independently read each of the MAF slides and UV wet mounts. Overall, the performance of UV fluorescence was similar to MAF slides with a higher agreement of 88.8% (95% CI 86.3%-91.3%) compared to 85.2% (95% CI 84.2%-86.2%), respectively. A higher false-negative rate was associated with MAF slides (MAF: 11.6%, UV: 6.8%). However, UV fluorescence was found to have a higher proportion of false positives (UF: 3.2%, MAF: 2%) and misidentified coccidia. Discrepant results regardless of methods were more frequently observed with technologists who have less experience in parasite morphology. This study is the first to document evidence to support the increased sensitivity and utility of UV fluorescence to improve laboratory diagnosis of cyclosporiasis. This study is important as there is a dearth of studies in our field of clinical parasitology that investigate and establish performance characteristics of classic and newer, non-molecular methods. While these studies may not seem as heavy hitting as some new technologies described in our related disciplines, for our field, such studies are long overdue and critically lacking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01084-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39651868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Clinical Microbiology ; Parasitology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024-12, p.e0108424</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Ma et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-ec4f286d7b8fed7821b72bf96f8d9d9971db3b859182ef867673bef35a278a13</cites><orcidid>0009-0003-0664-1546 ; 0000-0001-9975-941X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jcm.01084-24$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jcm.01084-24$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,52753,52754,52755</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39651868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pritt, Bobbi S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ma, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathison, Blaine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couturier, Marc Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Cyclosporiasis has historically been underdiagnosed due to a lack of clinical recognition and challenges in laboratory detection. Microscopic detection of requires either the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast or safranin stains, which are not part of the standard ova-and-parasite examination. Alternatively, the use of fluorescence microscopy for the detection of due to the organism's autofluorescent properties has been an available tool in the field of clinical parasitology. However, it is unknown how ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence performs compared to permanent stains in routine diagnostic laboratory settings. In this study, we present a direct head-to-head comparison of UV fluorescence against modified acid-fast (MAF) stains using 50 (35 positive, 5 positive, and 10 negative) blinded, concentrated stool specimens. Five technically competent medical laboratory technologists of varying years of experience in clinical parasitology at a large reference laboratory independently read each of the MAF slides and UV wet mounts. Overall, the performance of UV fluorescence was similar to MAF slides with a higher agreement of 88.8% (95% CI 86.3%-91.3%) compared to 85.2% (95% CI 84.2%-86.2%), respectively. A higher false-negative rate was associated with MAF slides (MAF: 11.6%, UV: 6.8%). However, UV fluorescence was found to have a higher proportion of false positives (UF: 3.2%, MAF: 2%) and misidentified coccidia. Discrepant results regardless of methods were more frequently observed with technologists who have less experience in parasite morphology. This study is the first to document evidence to support the increased sensitivity and utility of UV fluorescence to improve laboratory diagnosis of cyclosporiasis. This study is important as there is a dearth of studies in our field of clinical parasitology that investigate and establish performance characteristics of classic and newer, non-molecular methods. While these studies may not seem as heavy hitting as some new technologies described in our related disciplines, for our field, such studies are long overdue and critically lacking.</description><subject>Clinical Microbiology</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kDlPwzAAhS0EoqWwMSOvDCm2k_hgQxWXVImhDGyW46NxlcSR3bTqwH8nBTo96ekd0gfALUZzjAl_2Oh2jjDiRUaKMzDFSPCMUvR1DqYIiTLDOGcTcJXSBiFcFGV5CSa5oCXmlE_B96q2xvhuDTu7h41f11sYOrg46CakPkQFH2Ed9nBbWzgkC4ODQ7ONaudDY7fQNUOINmnbaQtbr2NIOvQHqFUHfdvHsLPQeLXuQvLpWNanYa9G5xpcONUke_OvM7B6ef5cvGXLj9f3xdMyU6IsMqsLRzg1rOLOGsYJrhipnKCOG2GEYNhUecVLgTmxjlNGWV5Zl5eKMK5wPgP3f6sqtURuwhC78UxiJI8A5QhQ_gKUpBizd3_Zfqhaa2QffaviQZ6I5T94aG7G</recordid><startdate>20241209</startdate><enddate>20241209</enddate><creator>Ma, Angela</creator><creator>Mathison, Blaine A</creator><creator>Couturier, Marc Roger</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0664-1546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-941X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241209</creationdate><title>Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis</title><author>Ma, Angela ; Mathison, Blaine A ; Couturier, Marc Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a954-ec4f286d7b8fed7821b72bf96f8d9d9971db3b859182ef867673bef35a278a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Microbiology</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathison, Blaine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couturier, Marc Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Angela</au><au>Mathison, Blaine A</au><au>Couturier, Marc Roger</au><au>Pritt, Bobbi S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2024-12-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>e0108424</spage><pages>e0108424-</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Cyclosporiasis has historically been underdiagnosed due to a lack of clinical recognition and challenges in laboratory detection. Microscopic detection of requires either the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast or safranin stains, which are not part of the standard ova-and-parasite examination. Alternatively, the use of fluorescence microscopy for the detection of due to the organism's autofluorescent properties has been an available tool in the field of clinical parasitology. However, it is unknown how ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence performs compared to permanent stains in routine diagnostic laboratory settings. In this study, we present a direct head-to-head comparison of UV fluorescence against modified acid-fast (MAF) stains using 50 (35 positive, 5 positive, and 10 negative) blinded, concentrated stool specimens. Five technically competent medical laboratory technologists of varying years of experience in clinical parasitology at a large reference laboratory independently read each of the MAF slides and UV wet mounts. Overall, the performance of UV fluorescence was similar to MAF slides with a higher agreement of 88.8% (95% CI 86.3%-91.3%) compared to 85.2% (95% CI 84.2%-86.2%), respectively. A higher false-negative rate was associated with MAF slides (MAF: 11.6%, UV: 6.8%). However, UV fluorescence was found to have a higher proportion of false positives (UF: 3.2%, MAF: 2%) and misidentified coccidia. Discrepant results regardless of methods were more frequently observed with technologists who have less experience in parasite morphology. This study is the first to document evidence to support the increased sensitivity and utility of UV fluorescence to improve laboratory diagnosis of cyclosporiasis. This study is important as there is a dearth of studies in our field of clinical parasitology that investigate and establish performance characteristics of classic and newer, non-molecular methods. While these studies may not seem as heavy hitting as some new technologies described in our related disciplines, for our field, such studies are long overdue and critically lacking.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>39651868</pmid><doi>10.1128/jcm.01084-24</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0664-1546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-941X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024-12, p.e0108424
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_asm2_journals_10_1128_jcm_01084_24
source American Society for Microbiology Journals
subjects Clinical Microbiology
Parasitology
title Shedding new light on Cyclospora : how the use of ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy can improve diagnosis of cyclosporiasis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T21%3A45%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_asm2_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shedding%20new%20light%20on%20Cyclospora%20:%20how%20the%20use%20of%20ultraviolet%20fluorescence%20microscopy%20can%20improve%20diagnosis%20of%20cyclosporiasis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Ma,%20Angela&rft.date=2024-12-09&rft.spage=e0108424&rft.pages=e0108424-&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jcm.01084-24&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_asm2_%3E39651868%3C/pubmed_asm2_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39651868&rfr_iscdi=true