Bombay Hustle: Making Movies in a Colonial City
From starry-eyed fans with dreams of fame to cotton entrepreneurs turned movie moguls, the Bombay film industry has historically energized a range of practices and practitioners, playing a crucial and compelling role in the life of modern India. Bombay Hustle presents an ambitious history of Indian...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | From starry-eyed fans with dreams of fame to cotton entrepreneurs
turned movie moguls, the Bombay film industry has historically
energized a range of practices and practitioners, playing a crucial
and compelling role in the life of modern India. Bombay
Hustle presents an ambitious history of Indian cinema as a
history of material practice, bringing new insights to studies of
media, modernity, and the late colonial city. Drawing on original
archival research and an innovative transdisciplinary approach,
Debashree Mukherjee offers a panoramic portrait of the
consolidation of the Bombay film industry during the talkie
transition of the 1920s-1940s. In the decades leading up to
independence in 1947, Bombay became synonymous with marketplace
thrills, industrial strikes, and modernist experimentation. Its
burgeoning film industry embodied Bombay's spirit of "hustle,"
gathering together and spewing out the many different energies and
emotions that characterized the city. Bombay Hustle
examines diverse sites of film production-finance, pre-production
paperwork, casting, screenwriting, acting, stunts-to show how
speculative excitement jostled against desires for scientific
management in an industry premised on the struggle between
contingency and control. Mukherjee develops the concept of a
"cine-ecology" in order to examine the bodies, technologies, and
environments that collectively shaped the production and
circulation of cinematic meaning in this time. The book thus brings
into view a range of marginalized film workers, their labor and
experiences; forgotten film studios, their technical practices and
aesthetic visions; and overlooked connections among media
practices, geographical particularities, and historical exigencies. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.7312/mukh19614 |