Jitter Across 15 Years: Leveraging Precise Photometry from Kepler and TESS to Extract Exoplanets from Radial Velocity Time Series
Stellar activity contamination of radial velocity (RV) data is one of the top challenges plaguing the field of extreme precision RV (EPRV) science. Previous work has shown that photometry can be very effective at removing such signals from RV data, especially stellar activity caused by rotating star...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Stellar activity contamination of radial velocity (RV) data is one of the top
challenges plaguing the field of extreme precision RV (EPRV) science. Previous
work has shown that photometry can be very effective at removing such signals
from RV data, especially stellar activity caused by rotating star spots and
plage.The exact utility of photometry for removing RV activity contamination,
and the best way to apply it, is not well known. We present a combination
photometric and RV study of eight Kepler/K2 FGK stars with known stellar
variability. We use NEID RVs acquired simultaneously with TESS photometry, and
we perform injection recovery tests to quantify the efficacy of recent TESS
photometry versus archival Kepler/K2 photometry for removing stellar
variability from RVs. We additionally experiment with different TESS sectors
when training our models in order to quantify the real benefit of
simultaneously acquired RVs and photometry. We conclude that Kepler photometry
typically performs better than TESS at removing noise from RV data when it is
available, likely due to longer baseline and precision. In contrast, for
targets with available K2 photometry, especially those most active, and with
high precision ($\sigma_{NEID}$ $ |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2412.11329 |