On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets

In 1971 Cusick proved that every real number $x\in[0,1]$ can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients equal to $1$. In other words, if we define a set $$ S(k):= \{ x\in[0,1] : a_n(x) \geq k \text{ for all } n\in\mathbb{N} \}, $$ then $$ S(2)+S(2) = [0,1]. $$ He also...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Shulga, Nikita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shulga, Nikita
description In 1971 Cusick proved that every real number $x\in[0,1]$ can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients equal to $1$. In other words, if we define a set $$ S(k):= \{ x\in[0,1] : a_n(x) \geq k \text{ for all } n\in\mathbb{N} \}, $$ then $$ S(2)+S(2) = [0,1]. $$ He also conjectured that this result is unique in the sense that if you exclude partial quotients from $1$ to $k-1$ with $k\geq3$, then the Lebesgue measure $\lambda$ of the set of numbers which can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients from $\{1,\ldots,k-1\}$ is equal to $0$, that is $$\lambda\Bigl( S(k)+S(k) \Bigl)= 0 \text{ for }k\geq 3.$$ In this paper, we disprove the conjecture of Cusick by showing that $$ S(k)+S(k) \supseteq \left[0,\frac{1}{k-1}\right]. $$ The proof is constructive and does not rely on ideas from previous works on the topic. We also show the existence of countably many 'gaps' in $S(k)+S(k)$, that is intervals, for which the endpoints lie in $S(k)+S(k)$, while none of the elements in the interior do so. Finally, we prove several results on the sums $$ S(m)+S(n) $$ for $m\neq n$.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2411.17379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_17379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2411_17379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_2411_173793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjE01DM0Nza35GQw9M9TSFRwzs_LSk0uKS1KVchPU3AuLc5MzlbIB8kUl-aChRLzSvKLFIpTS4p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtjw-IKizNzEosp4kCXxYEuMCasAAPwzMAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Shulga, Nikita</creator><creatorcontrib>Shulga, Nikita</creatorcontrib><description>In 1971 Cusick proved that every real number $x\in[0,1]$ can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients equal to $1$. In other words, if we define a set $$ S(k):= \{ x\in[0,1] : a_n(x) \geq k \text{ for all } n\in\mathbb{N} \}, $$ then $$ S(2)+S(2) = [0,1]. $$ He also conjectured that this result is unique in the sense that if you exclude partial quotients from $1$ to $k-1$ with $k\geq3$, then the Lebesgue measure $\lambda$ of the set of numbers which can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients from $\{1,\ldots,k-1\}$ is equal to $0$, that is $$\lambda\Bigl( S(k)+S(k) \Bigl)= 0 \text{ for }k\geq 3.$$ In this paper, we disprove the conjecture of Cusick by showing that $$ S(k)+S(k) \supseteq \left[0,\frac{1}{k-1}\right]. $$ The proof is constructive and does not rely on ideas from previous works on the topic. We also show the existence of countably many 'gaps' in $S(k)+S(k)$, that is intervals, for which the endpoints lie in $S(k)+S(k)$, while none of the elements in the interior do so. Finally, we prove several results on the sums $$ S(m)+S(n) $$ for $m\neq n$.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.17379</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Mathematics - Number Theory</subject><creationdate>2024-11</creationdate><rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17379$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.17379$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shulga, Nikita</creatorcontrib><title>On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets</title><description>In 1971 Cusick proved that every real number $x\in[0,1]$ can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients equal to $1$. In other words, if we define a set $$ S(k):= \{ x\in[0,1] : a_n(x) \geq k \text{ for all } n\in\mathbb{N} \}, $$ then $$ S(2)+S(2) = [0,1]. $$ He also conjectured that this result is unique in the sense that if you exclude partial quotients from $1$ to $k-1$ with $k\geq3$, then the Lebesgue measure $\lambda$ of the set of numbers which can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients from $\{1,\ldots,k-1\}$ is equal to $0$, that is $$\lambda\Bigl( S(k)+S(k) \Bigl)= 0 \text{ for }k\geq 3.$$ In this paper, we disprove the conjecture of Cusick by showing that $$ S(k)+S(k) \supseteq \left[0,\frac{1}{k-1}\right]. $$ The proof is constructive and does not rely on ideas from previous works on the topic. We also show the existence of countably many 'gaps' in $S(k)+S(k)$, that is intervals, for which the endpoints lie in $S(k)+S(k)$, while none of the elements in the interior do so. Finally, we prove several results on the sums $$ S(m)+S(n) $$ for $m\neq n$.</description><subject>Mathematics - Number Theory</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMzMjE01DM0Nza35GQw9M9TSFRwzs_LSk0uKS1KVchPU3AuLc5MzlbIB8kUl-aChRLzSvKLFIpTS4p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDvJtriLOHLtjw-IKizNzEosp4kCXxYEuMCasAAPwzMAM</recordid><startdate>20241126</startdate><enddate>20241126</enddate><creator>Shulga, Nikita</creator><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241126</creationdate><title>On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets</title><author>Shulga, Nikita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_2411_173793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Mathematics - Number Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shulga, Nikita</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shulga, Nikita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets</atitle><date>2024-11-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>In 1971 Cusick proved that every real number $x\in[0,1]$ can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients equal to $1$. In other words, if we define a set $$ S(k):= \{ x\in[0,1] : a_n(x) \geq k \text{ for all } n\in\mathbb{N} \}, $$ then $$ S(2)+S(2) = [0,1]. $$ He also conjectured that this result is unique in the sense that if you exclude partial quotients from $1$ to $k-1$ with $k\geq3$, then the Lebesgue measure $\lambda$ of the set of numbers which can be expressed as a sum of two continued fractions with no partial quotients from $\{1,\ldots,k-1\}$ is equal to $0$, that is $$\lambda\Bigl( S(k)+S(k) \Bigl)= 0 \text{ for }k\geq 3.$$ In this paper, we disprove the conjecture of Cusick by showing that $$ S(k)+S(k) \supseteq \left[0,\frac{1}{k-1}\right]. $$ The proof is constructive and does not rely on ideas from previous works on the topic. We also show the existence of countably many 'gaps' in $S(k)+S(k)$, that is intervals, for which the endpoints lie in $S(k)+S(k)$, while none of the elements in the interior do so. Finally, we prove several results on the sums $$ S(m)+S(n) $$ for $m\neq n$.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2411.17379</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.17379
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_2411_17379
source arXiv.org
subjects Mathematics - Number Theory
title On a Conjecture of Cusick on a sum of Cantor sets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20a%20Conjecture%20of%20Cusick%20on%20a%20sum%20of%20Cantor%20sets&rft.au=Shulga,%20Nikita&rft.date=2024-11-26&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2411.17379&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E2411_17379%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true